URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53690--------------------------------------------------
       Wrong claim number
   DIR By: WhoLetTheScamsOut
       Date: January 16, 2025, 11:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So im trying to help someone with their claim.
       Long story short
       They received a claim form dated 5th December 2024, acknowledged
       it 11th December 2024 (received auto acknowledgment), sent
       defence on same day BUT made an error with the claim number when
       sending defence via email. They’ve received a default judgement
       dated 13th January 2025 and when I asked them to look over what
       they’ve sent/received, turns out they’ve missed an email from
       the CNBC asking for the correct claim number as the one they’ve
       referenced was wrong by one character.
       Claim form costs:
       Amount claimed: £177.88
       Court fee: £35
       Legal representative’s court: £50
       Total amount: £262.88
       Daily interest rate of £0.02 until judgment.
       Judgement form costs
       £179.32 for debt
       £110 for costs
       Total: £289.32
       Is it worth advicing them to complete the N244 set aside form
       for this mistake and pay the £303 fee? Also how likely do you
       think the court will accept the set aside?
       #Post#: 53694--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wrong claim number
   DIR By: The Slithy Tove
       Date: January 16, 2025, 12:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, it's questionable whether the court would accept the set
       aside, considering the reason for defence not being submitted
       properly was entirely on Defendant. Basically, it's "double or
       quits" considering the amounts.
       #Post#: 53698--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wrong claim number
   DIR By: WhoLetTheScamsOut
       Date: January 16, 2025, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That’s what I was thinking as well since the error was from the
       defendant itself. And whether it is accepted or not theyll still
       be out of pocket.
       #Post#: 53702--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Wrong claim number
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 16, 2025, 12:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The defendant should carefully consider whether to file an N244
       application, as the £303 fee for applying to set aside the
       judgment is unlikely to be recoverable. The claimant has not
       acted unreasonably, and unless the defendant can demonstrate
       that their error (e.g., the incorrect claim number) was
       unavoidable due to something the claimant did, the court will
       not order the claimant to cover the fee.
       Filing an N244 set aside application for the default judgment is
       worth considering if the defendant acts promptly and has a
       realistic prospect of defending the claim. Under CPR 13.3, the
       court has discretion to set aside a judgment, taking into
       account the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly,
       which includes ensuring parties can present their cases fully
       while avoiding unnecessary costs or delays.
       The court will weigh the fairness of allowing the defendant to
       correct their mistake against the claimant’s right to finality.
       The error appears inadvertent, and refusing a set aside would
       unfairly deny the defendant the opportunity to present a
       potentially strong defence.
       The defendant must weigh this cost against the amount of the CCJ
       (£289.32). Paying the full amount within one calendar month of
       the judgment (dated 13th January 2025) will result in the CCJ
       being completely expunged from the record, leaving no trace on
       credit files. This could be a cheaper and simpler option
       compared to applying for a set aside, which carries the risk of
       losing the £303 fee if unsuccessful.
       While a set-aside may still be worthwhile if the defence has
       strong prospects, the cost-benefit analysis should be carefully
       considered.
       Alternatively, the defendant could ask the claimant to consent
       to a set aside, which would be a cheaper alternative. If the
       claimant agrees, the court fee for a set aside with consent is
       only £119, significantly less than the £303 fee for a contested
       application. However, this route is likely to leave the claim
       standing, meaning the defendant will need to prepare a defence
       and potentially face further proceedings.
       To pursue this option, the defendant should contact the claimant
       or their solicitor and request their agreement to set aside the
       default judgment. If the claimant agrees, ask them to draft a
       consent order for both parties to sign. This document will
       outline that both parties consent to setting aside the judgment.
       This approach relies on the claimant's cooperation and does not
       guarantee the outcome of the claim itself. The defendant should
       weigh this option against paying the CCJ in full within one
       calendar month of the judgment to have it expunged from the
       record entirely.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1