URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53613--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: Mike_D
       Date: January 16, 2025, 6:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Guys, I decided to add the key phrases from
       [member=2249]stamfordman[/member] (thanks!) into my rationale
       after all.
       I added the link to The Gazette just in case they tried to
       dispute the "off-streetness" of the car park.
       Dear Sir/Madam,
       I have received a PCN for an alleged contravention of parking
       “with one or more wheels on a footpath”, code 62 (an on-street
       contravention).
       The alleged on-street contravention of footway parking cannot
       have occurred as my car was parked in Market Place, one of your
       off-street car parks:
  HTML https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4681461
       .
       I parked my car there at 18:20 on 14/01/2025 on western part of
       Market Place, adjacent to North Street.
       Additionally, according to the Conditions of Use of the car
       park, a vehicle should not be parked “beyond the bay markings”.
       However, this area of the square has no clearly marked parking
       spaces that a vehicle should be parked at. Such bay markings are
       clearly visible on the other part of Market Place, where white
       and yellow lines leave no doubt about it, but the area near
       North Street has no such lines. There are just some decorative
       patterns of cobblestone and stone slabs, which are hardly
       visible after dark and in wet conditions. I have parked there
       for the first time ever and it didn’t even cross my mind that
       anything there might be considered as “bay markings”. I just
       parked my car near several other cars parking in a similar
       manner, not posing any danger or being an obstacle for
       pedestrians or other vehicles.
       My alleged “contravention”, according to the CEO, is probably
       having one wheel parked on 10 cm of just another type of
       cobblestone, which can hardly be considered as a separate
       footpath at all (the actual footpath, where people do walk, is
       alongside the shops and North Street, very far away from any
       parked cars). No parking beyond any visible bay markings
       occurred as well.
       Please find the attached pictures of the position of my car.
       Given the:
       -
       -
       parked my car
       -
       I look forward to your early confirmation of cancellation.
       Best regards,
       Does it look alright?
       #Post#: 53629--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 16, 2025, 7:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What you're doing is mutually exclusive - saying the
       contravention cannot have occurred but it did occur and was
       trivial.
       In an off-street car park there is no such thing as footway
       parking. As you've deduced a correct contravention could be:
       86 Not parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space
       Anyway no one else has chipped in apart from Mick who rightly
       says some car park areas can be on-street but I really don't
       think Market Place is one.
       There is no rush so wait for other views.
       #Post#: 53633--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: January 16, 2025, 7:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       personally I would go with the wrong contravention code argument
       and see what they come back with, and leave out the de minimus
       argument for later.
       #Post#: 53644--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 16, 2025, 8:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I recall now that Market Place is barred to motorised vehicles
       as a pedestrian and cycle zone on Weds, Fri, Sat and Sun 6am-7pm
       apart from permit holders.
       As a car park it's only open for certain operational times on
       other days and not overnight on some days.
       #Post#: 53645--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: Mike_D
       Date: January 16, 2025, 8:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
       >
       > What you're doing is mutually exclusive - saying the
       contravention cannot have occurred but it did occur and was
       trivial.
       >
       > In an off-street car park there is no such thing as footway
       parking. As you've deduced a correct contravention could be:
       >
       > 86 Not parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space
       >
       > Anyway no one else has chipped in apart from Mick who rightly
       says some car park areas can be on-street but I really don't
       think Market Place is one.
       >
       > There is no rush so wait for other views.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Indeed, fair point!
       Though I used the word "alleged" and put contravention in
       caption marks, maybe irony and sarcasm is not the right way
       here...
       Apart from The Gazette, I have found another clue that this
       really is an off-street parking – RingGo website also classifies
       it as such too:
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6vtza359m4mfmlwa79bun/RingGo.JPG?rlkey=niwbgae6rnuldgamp4n6am56y&st=6et1r2vo&dl=0
       #Post#: 53658--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 16, 2025, 9:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's an unusual situation as it's a part-time off-street car
       park but at other times it appears to be a zone subject to a
       motorised vehicle ban and a 20mph speed limit, albeit only for
       permit holders whom I presume are traders.
       At the time of your PCN - 18:55 on Monday - the car park was
       operational.
       #Post#: 53666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: Mike_D
       Date: January 16, 2025, 10:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yup, exactly.
       The irony here was that I got back to the car at 18:58 in order
       not to get a PCN for overstaying, but instead I got a PCN for
       parking on a wrong kind of cobblestone  ::)
       PS That was Tuesday, but doesn't matter in this case - the car
       park was operational at the time.
       #Post#: 53775--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 17, 2025, 5:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry Tuesday. Just 5 mins before it became non-operational but
       you would have got 10 mins grace if paid up til 7pm.
       Note that Havering does not reoffer the discount if it rejects
       but I really do think this is a wrong contravention.
       #Post#: 54375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: Mike_D
       Date: January 21, 2025, 1:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK guys, as I don't think anyone more will chip in, I'll go with
       the wrong contravention approach, leaving the triviality
       argument for later - if they refuse.
       Cheers!
       #Post#: 61472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Havering, code 62, one wheel over a "footpath"
   DIR By: Mike_D
       Date: March 9, 2025, 11:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello guys!
       Back to the topic - yesterday I received their response to my
       appeal. They have rejected it...
       Here it is:
       Page 1
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wdyoy2tdwrj47w6lzjmoy/inf_appeal_rej_page1.jpg?rlkey=dzy20bfhmebebhydpbkpj9ze2&st=pn77udfv&dl=0
       Page 2
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/gdq83imdqx6b0bcjccdtz/inf_appeal_rej_page2.jpg?rlkey=0whdcktvbbwitj1klj9lngzhm&st=gf81nya3&dl=0
       What do I do now?
       Should I wait for the NTO (I am not the owner, my wife is, and
       we have different surnames) or should I go directly to the
       London Tribunals (on my own behalf)?
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page