URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53388--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 50L Performing a Prohibited Turn - No Left Turn
   DIR By: traz
       Date: January 14, 2025, 6:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Okay thanks. I'll say I was probably following a high sided
       vehicle.
       Yeah that's what I meant, there doesn't appear to anything in
       front of my vehicle as I made the left turn. There could have
       been near the sign but at least near the traffic light I
       wouldn't say there was anything obstructing my view.
       The appeal only allows me to write a 1000 characters.
       #Post#: 53412--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 50L Performing a Prohibited Turn - No Left Turn
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: January 15, 2025, 2:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > The appeal only allows me to write a 1000 characters.
       --- End Quote ---
       These online forms usually allow one to attach evidence. If so,
       best to write properly formatted reps, save as pdf and attach
       and write See attached in the box.
       Post your draft here for comment before sending, but do not miss
       deadline.
       #Post#: 53436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 50L Performing a Prohibited Turn - No Left Turn
   DIR By: spaceman
       Date: January 15, 2025, 5:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: traz link ---
       >
       > Okay thanks. I'll say I was probably following a high sided
       vehicle.
       > Yeah that's what I meant, there doesn't appear to anything in
       front of my vehicle as I made the left turn. There could have
       been near the sign but at least near the traffic light I
       wouldn't say there was anything obstructing my view.
       >
       > The appeal only allows me to write a 1000 characters.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There is no high-sided vehicle in the video. In fact there seems
       to be a significant gap before your vehicle appears, so why say
       there 'probably' was? I would leave this out as, on the
       evidence, it impacts on the credibility of your argument.
       #Post#: 53471--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 50L Performing a Prohibited Turn - No Left Turn
   DIR By: traz
       Date: January 15, 2025, 9:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This will be my response
       I wish to appeal the above PCN issued by CCTV on the following
       grounds:
       1. Section 48 of the The Secretary of State's Statutory Guidance
       to Local Authorities on the Civil Enforcement of Parking
       Contraventions states "The Secretary of State recommends that
       approved devices are used only where enforcement is difficult or
       sensitive and CEO enforcement is not practical". Section 87 of
       the Traffic Management Act states that local authorities must
       give regard to this guidance.
       2. The IOC CCTV code of conduct states that warning signs should
       be placed where CCTV is in use. No such signs were in place in
       the location where this PCN was issued therefore it is invalid.
       This has been confirmed at Adjudicator by the case of Rachel
       Johnson v Wirral. Quote form the code of conduct:
       "You must let people know that they are in an area where CCTV
       surveillance is being carried out. The most effective way of
       doing this is by using prominently placed signs at the entrance
       to the CCTV zone and reinforcing this with further signs inside
       the area. ....... Clear and prominent signs are particularly
       important where the cameras themselves are very discreet, or in
       locations where people might not expect to be under
       surveillance. As a general rule, signs should be more prominent
       and frequent where it would otherwise be less obvious to people
       that they are on CCTV
       Signs should:
       • Be clearly visible and readable;
       • Contain details of the organisation operating the system, the
       purpose for using CCTV and who to contact about the scheme
       (where these things are not obvious to those being monitored);
       and
       • Be an appropriate size depending on context, for example,
       whether they are viewed by pedestrians or car drivers."
       I do not believe that the 'no left turn' sign was sufficient as
       I believe a high sided vehicle was blocking the view of the
       signage prior to the turn.
       I do not believe that the above mentioned guidelines have been
       satisfied nor the case for MTC - Wimbledon Road JW Worple Road,
       as I did not see any signage to warn of CCTV, nor do I believe
       that it is justified to be observing vehicles at 19:12 for minor
       alleged contraventions which pose little to zero risk to other
       road users. I do not believe that a contravention has taken
       place on the pure basis that my vehicle was not causing
       obstruction nor a danger to other road users, hence I trust the
       PCN will be cancelled taking the above into consideration and
       the fact that this is a first time alleged contravention on my
       part.
       If you reject my appeal please send with your response a copy of
       the relevant traffic order and proof that the camera in use is
       an approved device as well as the camera safety and maintenance
       logs. Please consider this a request under the freedom of
       information act. I wish to also request the following
       information should my appeal be rejected:
       • The CCTV camera's instruction manual for operation as well as
       information regarding the amount of PCN's issued using this CCTV
       camera, and the frequency of PCN's issued.
       • Road maintenance logs, and information regarding the time and
       date the no left turn markings were inspected and if necessary,
       re-painted
       • Information about the amount of PCN's issued around the Merton
       area due to alleged 'no left turn' offences
       • Information about the amount of successful and unsuccessful
       appeals to alleged 'no left turn' offences around the Merton
       area
       • Information about the amount of PCN's issued across the London
       area via CCTV for alleged no left turn offences and further to
       this, information about the amount of successful and
       unsuccessful appeals to alleged no left turn offences within the
       London area.
       • Information on the amount of revenue generated through PCN's
       issued due to no left turn offences
       • Information on the amount of vehicles involved in accidents
       within the Merton area, and within the London area due to no
       left turn offences.
       • Information on the amount of PCN's that have been successfully
       appealed for other no left turn offences across the Merton area,
       and the London area
       I request the above information only in the event that my PCN is
       not cancelled. This is to ensure that I have all evidence
       relevant to my case should this proceed further and if I may
       need to go to an adjudicator later on.
       After further inspection of the local area where the alleged
       contravention took place, it’s clear that there has been a
       breech of the IOC CCTV Code of conduct on Merton council's part.
       I must also stress that in the unlikely event that my grounds
       for appeal aren’t taken seriously, I will be taking this matter
       further and contacting an adjudicator.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page