URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53098--------------------------------------------------
       Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County Court
       Claim
   DIR By: shamzuddin
       Date: January 12, 2025, 5:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello Everyone,
       I received a PCN back in 2021 and stupidly ignored it thinking
       nothing would come of it. I've now received a Count Court Claim
       from Moorside Legal. The original claimant is Parking Control
       Limited. The location was Collison Avenue, Barnet, EN5 3EP and
       it was a windshield PCN.
       The PCN was received for being 'parked within a restricted
       area.' Unfortunately I moved houses over a year ago and no
       longer have any of the paperwork received from either Parking
       Control Management or Moorside Legal apart from a Letter of
       Claim received October 2024 and the most recent County Court
       Claim form. If I am to request a Particulars of Claim, would I
       request this from Parking Control Limited or Moorside Legal?
       I have already completed the Acknowledgement of service and the
       new deadline is 04/02/2025. Any help on the next steps to
       prepare for a defence is much appreciated
       Link to photos:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/ZE4ZhvZ
       #Post#: 53111--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 12, 2025, 8:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are correct with your assessment of your defence deadline.
       With a claim date of 2nd January 2025 and having submitted your
       Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) in a timely manner, you now
       have until 4pm on Tuesday 4th February to submit your defence.
       You already have the PoC. You do not need to “request” them. The
       obligation is on the claimant to provide detailed particulars so
       that you are able to submit a valid defence.
       CPR 16.4 applies. Moorside Legal have failed to comply with CPR
       16.4, subsection 1(a) in particular. There is plenty of
       persuasive appeal precedent to have this claim struck out for
       failing to provide a concise statement of facts, never mind the
       rest of CPR 16.4.
       This claim is easily defended and will rely on the persuasive
       appeals of CEL v Chan (2023)
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nb9ypbecuurpmln00dily/CELvChan-appeal-transcript.pdf?rlkey=7mpuvpmpe45s2zbhch21om1ez&st=o5ubdw9n&dl=0<br
       />and CPMS v Akande (2024)
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/y631olc61z1slr6xfrdsk/CPM-v-AKANDE.pdf?rlkey=kltpojedcxiwarxr0sdfyjo05&st=wptv1l16&dl=0<br
       />to have it struck out at allocation stage.
       #Post#: 53119--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 13, 2025, 3:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the defence I advise you to submit. Because the PoC are
       so woefully inadequate, no valid defence can be formed. It
       requests that the claim be struck out because of failure to
       comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a), listing the Chan and Akande appeal
       transcripts as persuasive argument. In the alternative, should
       the judge not be persuaded, it asks the court to order the
       claimant to submit fully detailed Particulars of Claim, which we
       know from experience that the claimant is unable to fully comply
       with.
       All you need to do is edit your name, the claim number and then
       sign the defence by typing your full name for the signature.
       There is nothing to edit in the draft order or the two
       transcripts. When done, save all the documents in PDF format and
       attach them to an email addressed to
       claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. Make sure
       that the clim number in in the email subject field and in the
       body, just put: "Please find attached the defence, transcripts
       and draft order in the matter of Parking Control Management UK
       Ltd v [your name] Claim No.: [claim number]"
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > [center]IN THE COUNTY COURT[/center]
       > [right]Claim No: [Claim Number][/right]
       >
       > [center]BETWEEN:
       >
       > Parking Control Management (UK) Ltd&#8232;
       > Claimant
       >
       > - and -
       >
       > [Defendant's Full Name]
       > &#8232;Defendant
       >
       >
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >
       > DEFENCE[/center]
       >
       >
       > 1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The
       Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and
       that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not
       disclose any valid cause of action.
       >
       > Preliminary Matter
       >
       > 2. The Defendant respectfully submits that the Particulars of
       Claim (PoC) fail to comply with the mandatory requirements of
       CPR 16.4(1)(a), which states that the PoC must include a concise
       statement of the facts on which the claimant relies. The PoC are
       so deficient in particulars that they fail to disclose a cause
       of action, making it impossible for the Defendant to plead
       properly.
       >
       > 3. Specifically, the PoC lack:
       >
       > [indent](a) The specific terms of the alleged contract that
       were purportedly breached;
       >
       > (b) The precise signage locations, alleged terms and
       conditions displayed thereon, or details of how the alleged
       breach occurred;
       >
       > (c) Attachment or details of the contract relied upon,
       contrary to CPR PD 16.7.5;
       >
       > (d) Particularity as to the alleged breach, including its
       nature, time, and location;
       >
       > (e) An explanation of how the sum claimed is calculated,
       including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or
       other charges;
       >
       > (f) Clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or
       the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead
       alternative causes of action without specificity.[/indent]
       >
       > 4. In light of the above, the Defendant respectfully requests
       that the court strikes out the claim pursuant to CPR 3.4(2) on
       the basis that:
       >
       > [indent]• The statement of case discloses no reasonable
       grounds for bringing the claim; and
       >
       > • The statement of case is an abuse of process.[/indent]
       >
       > 5. The Defendant cites the cases of CEL v Chan 2023 [E7GM9W44]
       and CPMS v Akande 2024 [K0DP5J30], which are persuasive
       appellate decisions. In these cases, claims were struck out due
       to identical failures to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a). Transcripts
       of these decisions are attached to this Defence.
       >
       > Alternative Submission
       >
       > 6. The Defendant submits that the correct course of action is
       for the court to strike out the claim due to the Claimant's
       clear and material failure to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a). The
       rules exist to ensure fairness, and the Claimant's
       non-compliance cannot be excused. The Defendant asserts that
       "rules are rules," and the Claimant has failed to follow them.
       >
       > 7. However, in the unlikely event that the court does not
       agree with the persuasive nature of the cited appellate
       decisions, the Defendant submits the following alternative:
       >
       > [indent]• The court should make an order requiring the
       Claimant to provide the following further and better
       particulars:
       >
       > [indent](a) Set out the specific terms of the alleged contract
       that were purportedly breached;
       >
       > (b) Specify the precise signage locations, alleged terms and
       conditions displayed thereon, or details of how the alleged
       breach occurred;
       >
       > (c) Provide attachment or details of the contract relied upon,
       as required by CPR PD 16.7.5;
       >
       > (d) Provide particularity as to the alleged breach, including
       its nature, time, and location;
       >
       > (e) Explain how the sum claimed is calculated, including the
       basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;
       >
       > (f) Clarify whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the
       keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative
       causes of action without specificity.[/indent][/indent]
       >
       > 8. Without such particulars, the Defendant is unable to
       properly respond to the claim, resulting in unfairness and
       prejudice.
       >
       > Draft Order
       >
       > 9. A draft order is appended to this defence, which the
       Defendant requests the court to consider adopting should the
       claim not be struck out at this stage.
       >
       > Statement of Truth
       >
       > I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I
       understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought
       against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false
       statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without
       an honest belief in its truth.
       >
       > Signed:
       >
       >
       > Date:
       --- End Quote ---
       CEL v Chan transcript
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nb9ypbecuurpmln00dily/CELvChan-appeal-transcript.pdf?rlkey=7mpuvpmpe45s2zbhch21om1ez&st=5735s458&dl=0
       CPMS v Akande transcript
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/y631olc61z1slr6xfrdsk/CPM-v-AKANDE.pdf?rlkey=kltpojedcxiwarxr0sdfyjo05&st=4z757gg9&dl=0
       Draft Order for the defence
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/z8zcqfdncdoajgj4ag6a4/short-defence-order.pdf?rlkey=at98xmfwj0ehi3w9d0ia15ogp&st=saqthunn&dl=0
       #Post#: 53149--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: shamzuddin
       Date: January 13, 2025, 7:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello b789,
       Thank you very much for your time and effort into drafting this
       defence and finding the transcripts. I would just like to make
       clear that I may have actually been sent a PoC in the past but
       have misplaced it due to moving houses. Should I still proceed
       with this defence?
       #Post#: 53151--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 13, 2025, 7:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is no such thing as being sent "a PoC". The PoC are a
       section of the N1SDT Claim Form that you have shown us in your
       images. I repeat it here for you:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/OssZkJ5.jpeg
       You are responding to the claim with your defence as instructed.
       Are you absolutely positive that you submitted an AoS? I ask
       because of your confusion about terminology and forms.
       By submitting an AoS, you are basically extending the time
       allowed to submit your defence by 14 days. So, you either submit
       your defence no later than 4pm on Friday 21st January or else
       you submit (or already submitted) an AoS which then gives you
       until 4pm on Friday 7th February to submit your defence.
       #Post#: 53155--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: shamzuddin
       Date: January 13, 2025, 7:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for clearing that up for me. Apologies for not being
       familiar with the terminologies, I’ve never dealt with parking
       tickets before and am trying to familiarise myself with the
       forum. I’m only just learning all of the acronyms! I have
       definitely submitted the Acknowledgement of Service and had the
       date extended. I will now submit the defence and transcripts
       with my details
       #Post#: 56010--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: shamzuddin
       Date: January 31, 2025, 7:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       I have attached the response I have received. It includes a
       Directions questionnaire
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 56014--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 31, 2025, 7:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Having received your own N180 (make sure it is not simply a copy
       of the claimants N180), do not use the paper form. Ignore all
       the other forms that came with it. you can discard those.
       Download your own here and fill it in on your computer. You sign
       it by simply typing your full name in the signature box.
  HTML https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673341e779e9143625613543/N180_1124.pdf
       Here are the answers to some of the less obvious questions:
       [indent]• The name of the court is "Civil National Business
       Centre".
       • To be completed by "Your full name" and you are the
       "Defendant".
       • C1: "YES"
       • D1: "NO". Reason: "I wish to question the Claimant about their
       evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any
       misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions.
       Given the Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking
       case paperwork for a living, having this case heard solely on
       papers would appear to put the Claimant at an unfair advantage,
       especially as they would no doubt prefer the Defendant not to
       have the opportunity to expose the issues in the Claimants
       template submissions or speak as the only true witness to events
       in question.."
       • F1: Whichever is your nearest county court. Use this to find
       it:
  HTML https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-option
       • F3: "1".
       • Sign the form by simply typing your full name for the
       signature.[/indent]
       When you have completed the form, attach it to a single email
       addressed to both dq.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and info@dcblegal.co.uk
       and CC in yourself. Make sure that the claim number is in the
       subject field of the email.
       #Post#: 57064--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: shamzuddin
       Date: February 7, 2025, 5:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       Thank you for your previous reply. I have now been given an
       appointment for a telephone mediation session. Could you please
       advise? Thanks again
       Claim number:
       Parties: PARKING CONTROL MANAGEMENT UK LIMITED v
       Your telephone mediation appointment
       Appointment date: 25/02/2025
       Appointment time slot: 12:00 to 14:00
       Your confidential
       telephone&#8239;mediation&#8239;appointment&#8239;has been
       booked for the above date and time slot. This means that the
       mediator will call you between the times shown. Your appointment
       will last for around one hour from the point at which the
       mediator calls.
       The mediator will call both parties separately – you will not
       talk directly to the other side. They will try to help you both
       come to an agreement before the case goes to court.
       Where your mediation appointment is mandatory, If you do not
       attend the appointment, the judge will take this into
       consideration at any court hearing and may issue a penalty. This
       could include the judge automatically ruling in the other
       party’s favour or ordering you to pay for some or all the other
       party’s costs.
       Preparing for your appointment
       You must make sure you have provided us with, or confirmed, the
       name and number of the person who will be conducting the
       mediation appointment. If you have not done this, or need to
       update your telephone number, you should contact us using the
       details at the end of this letter no less than 5 working days
       before your mediation appointment. Failure to do so may result
       in your mediation appointment not taking place and may result in
       a Judge issuing a penalty where the mediation was mandatory.
       The mediator will call from a withheld number. Make sure that
       withheld numbers are not blocked on your phone.
       Be ready to receive a call from the mediator from the beginning
       of your time slot. The mediator will call the telephone number
       you provided in your application.
       If the mediator cannot contact you within 10 minutes of the
       appointment start, the appointment will be cancelled and you
       may, where mediation is mandatory, face a penalty for
       non-attendance.
       Rebooking your appointment
       If you need to rebook your appointment, you must have a good
       reason. The administration team will only consider rebooking in
       exceptional circumstances, such as an accident or a family
       bereavement. You must let us know as soon as possible.
       Nominating a different representative
       If you want someone else to represent you
       at&#8239;mediation&#8239;(like a trusted friend, relative or a
       solicitor) you must contact the mediation team
       If you want to choose someone to attend your mediation
       appointment on your behalf who is not a part of the claim or is
       not a legal representative, you will also need to complete a
       delegated authority form. You can find out more about this on
       GOV.UK.
       Your representative must know the facts of the case, understand
       how far you’re willing to compromise and have full authority to
       act on your behalf. You’re legally bound to any settlement
       agreements your representative makes on your behalf.
       What happens in your&#8239;mediation&#8239;appointment?
       Introduction from the mediator
       The mediator will introduce themselves and check that you have
       read and understood the&#8239;mediation process.
       Explaining your position
       You will need to briefly explain your claim or defence to the
       mediator. You should prepare for yourself a brief summary of the
       main points.
       Negotiating options&#8239;
       You’re attending&#8239;mediation&#8239;with a view to settling
       your case. This means negotiating to overcome disputed issues.
       The mediator is neutral and helps each party to explore options
       and discuss risks.&#8239;Mediation&#8239;works when you’re
       willing to listen to what the other party has to say, negotiate
       and agree a settlement.
       Building agreement
       Settlement can be in many different forms, for example, payment,
       goods or work. Both parties must agree on the outcome and feel
       they have reached an acceptable resolution.
       Reaching a settlement
       The mediator will read the terms of the settlement and confirm
       agreement with each party. Once agreed, the settlement is
       legally binding and cannot be changed.&#8239;A copy of
       the&#8239;mediation&#8239;settlement is sent to both parties and
       placed on the court file.
       Confidentiality
       All&#8239;mediation&#8239;appointments are confidential. An
       agreed settlement includes a standard confidentiality clause.
       Ending the&#8239;mediation&#8239;process
       The mediator can end the&#8239;mediation&#8239;if, at any time:
       either party breaches the terms on which they agreed
       to&#8239;mediation
       there is no prospect that the&#8239;mediation&#8239;will end in
       settlement
       the mediator deems it inappropriate to continue in the case that
       one or both parties are vulnerable users
       either party asks to end&#8239;mediation
       Find out more about Small Claims Mediation by watching our video
       HERE. Find out more in the guide to the&#8239;Small
       Claims&#8239;Mediation&#8239;Service&#8239;on&#8239;GOV.UK.
       Small Claims&#8239;Mediation&#8239;Service contact details
       If you have any complaints or issues to raise about
       the&#8239;Mediation&#8239;Service, contact us by email or
       telephone:
       Email:&#8239;&#8239;scmreferrals@justice.gov.uk
       Telephone: 0300 123 4593
       Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
       We record our calls for monitoring and training as it helps
       improve the service we deliver. If you want to know more about
       how we handle your personal data, visit
  HTML https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/your-data-and-how-we-use-it
       If you want to make a complaint by email, clearly title your
       message as ‘complaint’ in the subject field.&#8239;
       This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the
       attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
       storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
       recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
       return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
       to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
       Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
       in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you
       are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and
       retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking
       software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any
       time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
       when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
       Delegation Of Authority to Mediate.pdf
       #Post#: 57068--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Control Management PCN - Moorside Legal - County
       Court Claim
   DIR By: b789
       Date: February 7, 2025, 5:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yup. Complete waste of time but it is only mandatory to "attend"
       the call. It is not part of the judicial process and there is no
       judge or solicitors involved.
       You tell the mediator that the claimant has a copy of your
       defence and you are only prepared to discuss it with a judge and
       you offer £0. It will be over in minutes.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 5
   DIR Next Page