URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 54169--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 21: Suspended Bay. Royal Greenwich.
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 20, 2025, 5:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > How do you know you were in contravention at 9.20, the sign
       doesn't say anything about extent of restriction. Was it 0001- H
       hour or 0900 to 0915 and was it only on 10th or what?
       >
       > IMO, the sign is defective as it doesn't give hours or days.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I would have thought that if no time explicit time is given on a
       dated suspension sign, then the assumption should be whole 24
       hours.
       However I  had a little delve into the internet to find out if
       the sign is compliant. The following may give me a get out.
       The Traffic Signs, Regulations and General Directions 2016 do
       not define the yellow suspension sign used by most enforcement
       authorities to control parking.
       Hence it is necessary for enforcement authorities to seek DfT
       authorisation for such signs, under Sections 64 and 65 of the
       Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.
       Someone did a FOI request to DOT to establish this in 2020.
  HTML https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/authority_for_parking_suspension
  HTML https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/authority_for_parking_suspension
       
       We encourage authorities to apply for an authorisation for their
       parking
       suspension signs which permits their use at any appropriate
       location on their
       roads. The authorisation specifies the information that can be
       shown on the
       sign, and its size, colour and character. All authorisations for
       this traffic sign
       which have been issued since 1 January 2011 may be viewed on the
       Department’s authorisation database at:
       The reply included a list of  enforcement authorities who have
       DfT authorisation.
       There is no sign of Greenwich, or indeed any authorities,
       seeking authorisation for suspension signs.
       www.dft.gov.uk/traffic-auths/
  HTML http://www.dft.gov.uk/traffic-auths/
       
       There is a case in London Tribunals which won on similar basis.
       Case from 2010
  HTML https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.londontribunals.gov.uk%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fkeycases%2FCampbell%2520v%2520Camden.doc%253B%2520Suspension%2520of%2520controls.doc%253B%2520signage.doc%253B%2520requirement%2520for%2520compliant%2520sign.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
       #Post#: 54176--------------------------------------------------
       TMO - How to get it
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 20, 2025, 6:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Quick query.
       How do I get a TMO for a Residents bay? Royal Borough of
       Greenwich.
       Excuse ignorance, I have never requested one before.
       Is this done by a FOI? Or an email to Council traffic dept?
       I hear references on this forum about the Gazette? Is this where
       the TMOs are published?
       #Post#: 54223--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TMO - How to get it
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 20, 2025, 11:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All published here:
  HTML https://redbridge.traffweb.app/traffweb/1/TrafficOrders
       You can search by street name / number, click on the restriction
       you want to look at and then click "view documents" and "order
       document". I also keep a backup copy of The Greenwich
       (Charged-For Parking Places) Order 2018
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xu2aSCOjY2c708_9igCLKv5PT47JRGkn/view<br
       />but for the map tiles, you'll have to get them from traffweb.
       #Post#: 54225--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TMO - How to get it
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: January 20, 2025, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Does this relate to your suspended residents' bay thread?
       #Post#: 54302--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TMO - How to get it
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 21, 2025, 2:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes Andy, but as this is a general query that might be useful to
       others I posted here.
       {  note to viewers, I originally posted this question in Flame
       Pit ]
       #Post#: 54303--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TMO - How to get it
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 21, 2025, 2:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > All published here:
  HTML https://redbridge.traffweb.app/traffweb/1/TrafficOrders
       >
       > You can search by street name / number, click on the
       restriction you want to look at and then click "view documents"
       and "order document". I also keep a backup copy of The Greenwich
       (Charged-For Parking Places) Order 2018
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xu2aSCOjY2c708_9igCLKv5PT47JRGkn/view<br
       />but for the map tiles, you'll have to get them from traffweb.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you CP.
       But did you mean Redbridge?  (which is freely readable)
       When I try
  HTML https://greenwich.traffweb.app/traffweb/1/TrafficOrders
  HTML https://greenwich.traffweb.app/traffweb/1/TrafficOrders
       I get a
       log on prompt.  I have tried to register. This is being
       approved.  Is this a staff page?
       #Post#: 54306--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 21: Suspended Bay. Royal Greenwich.
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 21, 2025, 3:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Greenwich (Charged-For Parking Places) Order 2018
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xu2aSCOjY2c708_9igCLKv5PT47JRGkn/view<br
       />
       Has the following relevant section on suspended bays, given the
       suspension reason was defined as "works" on the suspension
       notice:
       (3) Any person duly authorised by the Council or the
       Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
       may suspend the use of a parking place or any part thereof
       whenever he considers such suspension
       reasonably necessary:
       (b) for the purpose of any building operation, demolition or
       excavation adjacent to or in the
       near vicinity of the parking place, the maintenance, improvement
       or reconstruction of
       the highway or the cleaning of gullies in or adjacent to or in
       the near vicinity of the
       parking place, the laying, ****, alteration or repair in or
       adjacent to or in the near
       vicinity of the parking place of any sewer or of any main, pipe
       or apparatus for the
       supply of gas, water or electricity or of any electronic
       communications network or the
       placing, maintenance or removal of any traffic sign;
       (5) On the suspension of the use of a parking place or any part
       thereof in accordance with the
       provisions of this Article, the person authorising or causing
       such suspension shall place or cause to be
       placed in or adjacent to that parking place or that part
       thereof, as the case may be, a traffic sign indicating
       that waiting by vehicles is prohibited:
       I await the actual TMO. But it seems that from the above the
       council have not shot themselves in the foot by requiring a
       compliant warning sign - which does not exist. See London
       Borough of Camden Case No. : 2090523567 link above - but simply
       a  "traffic sign indicating that waiting by vehicles is
       prohibited".
       As the same case also says:
       In cases of bay suspensions I and many other adjudicators have
       taken the view that provided the Council can prove that the bay
       was lawfully authorised for suspension, and that there was a
       sign or signs properly sited which gave a clear indication of
       that fact, the motorist parking there will be in contravention.
       #Post#: 54888--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 21: Suspended Bay. Royal Greenwich.
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: January 24, 2025, 6:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK.  So I got the standard fob-off rejection of my informal
       challenge.
       Worth my while continuing this and risking 50%?
       The only thing which strikes me is the comment:
       "[Temporary suspension signs] have been checked and we can
       confirm that they are correct and in line with the regulations."
       Which begs the question what regulations? as AFAIK suspension
       signs are not defined.
       I have applied FOI for the TMO and the suspension request.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/50QCYrg.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/g3loMyZ.jpg
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page