URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 111628--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 1, 2026, 6:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is anyone able to assist with this now I’ve received the claim
       from the court? I can post a new thread if needed but I know
       that’s frowned on.
       Thanks!
       #Post#: 111635--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 1, 2026, 8:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Could you post up the original PCN?
       #Post#: 111661--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 1, 2026, 11:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here you go - does that mean that you can’t see the original
       from my first post?
  HTML https://imgbox.com/gJup7tKm
  HTML https://imgbox.com/wJ4PFPBc
  HTML https://imgbox.com/5KDIDJOF
       #Post#: 111754--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 2, 2026, 8:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are the original images visible now?
       Let me know if not.
       #Post#: 111756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 2, 2026, 9:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes - all visible now.
       So the original PCN was out of time for keeper liability.
       Can you confirm that the driver's identity was never revealed at
       any stage?
       #Post#: 111790--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 2, 2026, 11:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think the original notice was probably in time, but I didn’t
       see it for some time as the letter got accidentally put unopened
       into a box of paperwork and I only found it after the time to
       appeal.
       I’ve had various threatening letters up till now and responded
       as per the advice above. As expected I just got template
       nonsense replies.
       I was advised to wait till the actual claim arrived, which it
       now has nearly 2 years down the line. So I think now I need to
       reply to that properly and swiftly.
       I can confirm I have not at any point revealed or even hinted at
       the drivers identity (this forum has taught me well!). I can
       also confirm and would testify under oath that the driver was
       not me.
       I just want to try and make it go away as I’m tired of it now.
       Thanks!
       #Post#: 111797--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: DWMB2 Date: March 2, 2026, 12:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Smartdriver link=topic=4611.msg111790#msg111790
       date=1772474148]
       I think the original notice was probably in time
       [/quote]
       If this
  HTML https://imgbox.com/gJup7tKm
       is the original notice, it is not in
       time at all.
       That you weren't the driver puts you in a strong position. So,
       with regards to formulating your defence, take a look around the
       forum at some others and you'll get a sense of structure but, it
       is essentially a short series of statements that deals with each
       of the claimant's allegations, stating whether the defendant
       accepts, denies or cannot admit/deny each of them.
       As an example of how you might approach some of their claim
       form:
       [indent]1. The Defendant denies that the Claimant is entitled to
       relief in the sum claimed, or at all.
       2. It is denied that the Defendant was the driver of the
       vehicle. As the Defendant was not driving the vehicle, it
       follows that he cannot be liable as the driver.
       3. It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper
       of the vehicle, but liability pursuant to Schedule 4 of the
       Protection of Freedoms Act (PoFA) is denied. The Claimant failed
       to deliver a Notice to Keeper compliant with the provisions of
       PoFA, namely failing to deliver said notice within the relevant
       period of 14 days beginning with the day after that on which the
       specified period of parking ended, as defined by paragraph 9(5)
       of the act. The period of parking ended on 25th August 2024. The
       Claimant issued a notice by post on 8th August 2024. Under
       paragraph 9(6) of PoFA, a. notice sent by post is to be
       presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered
       (and so “given” for the purposes of sub-paragraph (4)) on the
       second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for
       this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday,
       Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales. This notice was
       therefore given on Monday 12th August 2024, this being 18 days
       after that on which the specified period of parking ended. As
       the Claimant has failed to issue a notice compliant with the
       requirements of PoFA, it is denied that the Defendant is liable
       as the registered keeper.
       [/indent]
       #Post#: 111799--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 2, 2026, 1:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok… I hadn’t noticed that.
       What about all the other comments above about the claim being
       not detailed, the issue re VAT, boiler plate responses and the
       like?
       Someone said earlier that this will be struck out or
       discontinued on that basis even if it was in time? It’s a few
       posts back. Let me know if you can’t see anything with the
       documents I posted last year.
       I’d rather throw everything at them to get them to discontinue.
       #Post#: 111802--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: DWMB2 Date: March 2, 2026, 2:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, put anything in that you believe helps your case, my
       suggestion above was around how to handle one of their
       allegations, it wasn't a full defence.
       I'm not sure I would make too much of the sparse particulars of
       claim in this case personally - that argument is essentially
       saying the particulars are too vague for you to respond
       properly. In this case, you are able to respond properly (hence
       my suggested words above), and you're able to respond with
       strong points.
       You can challenge their inclusion of debt collector fees, and
       challenge the rate of interest charged (the delay in bringing
       proceedings is theirs, not yours).
       However, personally I would lead with the PoFA arguments. These
       strike at the heart of their claim, and undermine their two
       claims as to your liability (1) that you are liable as the
       driver and (2) that you are liable as the keeper.
       If you can demonstrate you are not liable either as the keeper
       or the driver then any points around VAT or their use of
       boilerplate becomes irrelevant (that's not to say don't include
       them, but it is to say put your strongest point first).
       #Post#: 112174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NCP Birmingham City Centre. Judes Street. Broken Machine but
        missed letter
       By: Smartdriver Date: March 5, 2026, 9:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've looked through various threads and have got myself a bit
       confused about all of this process, as its all very new to me.
       Can anyone give a guide to exactly what and how I need to submit
       and what the process is, timelines etc (ideally with examples -
       I've seen example wording in other posts but I don't know enough
       about this to know how similar my case is?
       Assume I know nothing about any of it. Over the last couple of
       years I've been various lines of attack here and I want  to try
       to encompass them as best I can
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page