URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 52458--------------------------------------------------
       Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: darkpolar
       Date: January 8, 2025, 10:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       realised after reading a few posts here that I should probably
       post the case way before I take any actions, but we are where we
       are and hopefully can still receive some advices.
       In August, I parked in the Turner contemporary art gallery car
       park in Margate, it was Monday and the art gallery was closed
       and the parking was almost empty, but we went there for a walk
       on the beach. Upon checking the signage, the parking is still to
       be paid even on days Art gallery is closed, so I paid using
       RingGo for 2h, (although I struggle with this as I had to
       download the app and there were almost no signals). Played with
       dog and kids on the beach, and when time was up, we did came
       back to the carpark just a couple of minutes late. But having
       not seen any traffic warden (and I never experienced those kind
       of smart parking before), and an even emptier car park, we took
       our time to dry the dog and get sands off our shoes before
       leaving the parking. Toping up did cross my mind, but RingGo
       didn't seem to give me option to pay more once the session has
       ended.
       Anyway, a few weeks later I received the attached PCN saying I
       overstayed by 27 min. (arrival time 12:35 - departure time
       15:02, my Ringgo payment history shows I paid for 12:45-14:45.)
       [attach=1][attach=2]
       Although I recognise it is a case of overstay, I felt hard done
       by and disproportionate penalty as I did pay the parking for 120
       min out of 147 min, getting a PCN of £100 as if I have not paid
       at all. So hoping for some common sense, I used their appeal
       system, which was rejected a couple of weeks later, with the
       following message
       Thank you for your recent communication.
       Having considered your appeal in detail we have decided to
       uphold the Parking Charge as we believe that it was correctly
       issued in accordance with the terms and conditions advertised
       within the area concerned. As your appeal was received within
       the initial discount period we have extended the discount period
       until 15/10/2024.
       We note the comments made within your appeal, however we cannot
       rescind the PC on this basis. We wish to confirm that the
       contravention of insufficient paid time occurred as our system
       confirms that whilst 120 were purchased were purchased against
       Vehicle Registration Mark (VRM) xxx, your vehicle remained on
       site for 147 minutes. The signage onsite clearly informs
       motorist that they are required to purchase a valid ticket for
       the full duration of their vehicles stay onsite. Furthermore,
       additional time can be purchased at any point during throughout
       your vehicles stay, before exiting the car park, allowing for
       any unexpected overstays due to circumstances such as those
       outlined in your appeal.
       We wish to inform that the car park in question is operated by
       ANPR cameras system which captures images of your vehicle
       entering and exiting the site, which subsequently calculates
       your total stay duration. This information is then paired with
       the information entered into the payment machine/alternate
       payment option, to establish whether or not  the correct payment
       has been made against the full and correct vehicle registration
       for the total duration the vehicle is on site - this is
       calculated from the time of entrance to the time of exit.
       As the vehicle was on site in excess of the parking time
       purchased and no valid additional payments were made to cover
       the entire parking duration, we wish to advised that the
       advertised Terms and Conditions were breached. Subsequently the
       PC has been issued correctly. The Terms and Conditions of the
       car park are clearly advertised around the site and must be
       adhered to by all drivers.
       You have now reached the end of our internal appeals procedure
       and therefore you now have two options, you can pay or appeal -
       you cannot do both.
       If the Parking Charge was issued in England and Wales you also
       have the right of appeal to an independent appeals service
       (POPLA). If you wish to make an appeal to POPLA the forms are
       available on their website at www.popla.co.uk
       ...
       So I did lodge an appeal at Popla, hoping for less profit
       oriented more balanced people would have better common sense,
       but after waiting for 2 months, this also get rejected a couple
       of weeks ago, see case letter attached.
       [attach=3]
       So at this point, any advice appreciated, I just want to
       understand if it is still worth fighting the case, and if so,
       what further actions can I take?
       thanks in advance
       PS: There some pictures of signages submitted by SmartParking to
       POPLA but it seems I can't access them anymore on Popla since
       case is closed (they were not helpful in any sense as it just
       say you have to pay for the duration). Google map also not
       useful for signage as it pre-dated the parking completion I
       suppose.
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.3914381,1.3818267,3a,75y,40.56h,71.82t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s8c_G0TToEK5fd5595JD2pg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D18.184981950631283%26panoid%3D8c_G0TToEK5fd5595JD2pg%26yaw%3D40.563165920133144!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEwMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 52461--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: January 8, 2025, 10:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       shame you didn't cone here for advice first!
       I assume you revealed the identity of the driver to (not so)
       smart parking?
       #Post#: 52462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       and you paid for 2hrs but stayed for 2 1/2 hrs?
       #Post#: 52463--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oh dear. What a pity you hadn't come here for advice before
       appealing. (not so) Smart Parking are one of the easiest to
       defeat as they do not rely on PoFA to be able to hold the Keeper
       liable if the driver is not identified. They have no idea who
       the driver is and unless the Keeper blabs its inadvertently or
       otherwise, they have nowhere else to go with this.
       However, you are where you are, having blown the 'golden
       ticket'. The POPLA decision is not binding on you and so, do not
       pay them.
       You are now in a sort of limbo state. You will start to receive
       debt collector letters which you must ignore. The debt
       collectors are powerless to do anything, no matter how scary
       they sound. They are not a party to the contract allegedly
       breached by the driver. Never, ever, communicate or respond to a
       debt collector. You can safely ignore them.
       Eventually, you will receive a Letter of Claim (LoC) from their
       bulk litigator of choice, usually DCB Legal. After the LoC you
       will receive an actual N1SDT Claim Form from the CNBC. This must
       be responded to.
       Once the claim is defended, in due course they will eventually
       discontinue. Their modus operandi is well known and they will
       not go as far as a hearing, rather relying on you being low
       hanging fruit on the gullible tree and more likely to pay up out
       of ignorance and/or fear. Don't pay a penny, they will
       discontinue.
       We don't need to see any debt collector letters but do show us
       the LoC and eventually the actual Claim Form when they arrive so
       that we can advise accordingly.
       #Post#: 52468--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: darkpolar
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mickR link ---
       >
       > and you paid for 2hrs but stayed for 2 1/2 hrs?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       yeah paid 120 min out of the 147 min
       #Post#: 52470--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: darkpolar
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mickR link ---
       >
       > shame you didn't cone here for advice first!
       >
       > I assume you revealed the identity of the driver to (not so)
       smart parking?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       yeah, realised I should have researched more. but yes, I believe
       so, in my appeal to them I used "I" (paid) a lot...
       #Post#: 52471--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Doesn't matter. Wait for the claim, defend and they will
       discontinue. Don't waste your time on anything else and get on
       with your life in the meantime.
       #Post#: 52474--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: darkpolar
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > Oh dear. What a pity you hadn't come here for advice before
       appealing. (not so) Smart Parking are one of the easiest to
       defeat as they do not rely on PoFA to be able to hold the Keeper
       liable if the driver is not identified. They have no idea who
       the driver is and unless the Keeper blabs its inadvertently or
       otherwise, they have nowhere else to go with this.
       >
       > However, you are where you are, having blown the 'golden
       ticket'. The POPLA decision is not binding on you and so, do not
       pay them.
       >
       > You are now in a sort of limbo state. You will start to
       receive debt collector letters which you must ignore. The debt
       collectors are powerless to do anything, no matter how scary
       they sound. They are not a party to the contract allegedly
       breached by the driver. Never, ever, communicate or respond to a
       debt collector. You can safely ignore them.
       >
       > Eventually, you will receive a Letter of Claim (LoC) from
       their bulk litigator of choice, usually DCB Legal. After the LoC
       you will receive an actual N1SDT Claim Form from the CNBC. This
       must be responded to.
       >
       > Once the claim is defended, in due course they will eventually
       discontinue. Their modus operandi is well known and they will
       not go as far as a hearing, rather relying on you being low
       hanging fruit on the gullible tree and more likely to pay up out
       of ignorance and/or fear. Don't pay a penny, they will
       discontinue.
       >
       > We don't need to see any debt collector letters but do show us
       the LoC and eventually the actual Claim Form when they arrive so
       that we can advise accordingly.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       yes, I am gutted not finding this forum before... understood
       regarding ignoring the debt collectors and hold on till the LoC.
       But any chance that might somehow impact the credit score?
       thanks a lot
       #Post#: 52478--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: b789
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: darkpolar link ---
       >
       > understood regarding ignoring the debt collectors and hold on
       till the LoC. But any chance that might somehow impact the
       credit score?
       --- End Quote ---
       Absolutely not. We would never advise anything that could result
       in a CCJ.
       As I mentioned, they are relying on you being low-hanging fruit
       on the gullible tree and you have just shown why. You obviously
       do not understand how the process works and assuming that your
       credit record could be affected by this is exactly what they
       hope for.
       #Post#: 52481--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking PCN - Failure to pay for sufficient time
   DIR By: darkpolar
       Date: January 8, 2025, 11:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks! And how long does it take usually to reach the LoC
       stage? a couple of months or more?
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page