URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 52147--------------------------------------------------
       PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: C_H_R_I_S
       Date: January 6, 2025, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Turned left off a 40mph Busy A road which ive used for years
       Turns out there is now a tiny sign there AFTER the turn saying
       you cant unless you have a resident permit!
       What is happening to our roads these days! :'(  >:(
       Images of PCN:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/w09dF4M/IMG-9379.jpg
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/hMWcvnd/IMG-9380.jpg
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/3Sz8MWv/IMG-9381.jpg
       Coordinates of turn - Google Not updated with latest sign post:
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4913991,-0.2365586,3a,75y,95.37h,83.83t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s9upYEORyBaITDvU1DLs9iQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.174312605000438%26panoid%3D9upYEORyBaITDvU1DLs9iQ%26yaw%3D95.36975487709302!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTIxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
       My reason to appeal would be insufficient signage but im not
       sure how to word it or add anything else.
       I am willing to go to court for this as the restriction is
       ridiculous and the signage even worse.
       #Post#: 52151--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: C_H_R_I_S
       Date: January 6, 2025, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Seems this same area is getting a lot of traction:
       Same in this thread:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-hammersith-london-rivercourt-rd/
       #Post#: 52174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 6, 2025, 12:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       H&F is often forgiving of a first time PCN for moving traffic
       contraventions at newish restrictions so a polite ask may do it
       plus a note about signage.
       Were you going anywhere local?
       #Post#: 52187--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 6, 2025, 1:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > I am willing to go to court for this as the restriction is
       ridiculous and the signage even worse.
       --- End Quote ---
       There is no "court", but you can take them to London Tribunals.
       The restriction may be ridiculous to you, but will be within a
       Traffic Regulation Order, so saying it is ridiculous will not
       win any appeal. However the council have a duty under LATOR
       Regulation 8 to place adequate signage to indicate the
       restriction.
       Note that the signage is not "tiny", but quite large, and there
       are normally two of them one each side of the restriction. For
       access off this very busy road, the council should have placed
       an advance warning sign on the main road, so is there one there
       ?
       The video shows you charging in at quite a pace so it seems
       clear you didn't notice the signs, that are commonly called
       "Flying motorbike " signs, because there is a diagram of a
       motorbike above that for a car. It seems to me that this is what
       caught you out: -
       --- Quote ---
       > Turned left off a 40mph Busy A road which ive used for years
       --- End Quote ---
       Anyway, if you can confirm whether there is any advance warning
       sign, please, as GSV is not sufficiently up-to-date it seems.
       #Post#: 52204--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: Raj
       Date: January 6, 2025, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How many times have you driven over this road since dec 1st 2024
       ? Been told that 1st offence is being let off with a warning .
       #Post#: 52209--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: Raj
       Date: January 6, 2025, 3:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the signage at the entrance of the road. To my knowledge
       no other permanent signs on the main road leading to this.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 52218--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 6, 2025, 5:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Having now looked at GSV September 2024, it seems there are no
       signs warning of the upcoming restriction, which for a 40 mph
       road is quite disgraceful, so I suggest you submit
       representations that the signage for this restriction is totally
       inadequate. The only approach is a left turn from the Great West
       Road (A4), which has a speed limit of 40 mph, and there is no
       warning whatsoever of the restriction on approach.
       The previous street on the left, Weltje Road is only an exit
       with No Entry signs, but here, the junction has been remodelled
       to only allow exit, the entry space has been removed and the
       footway extended: -
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/5Axt1bfRHjvQUA7a6
       In addition, the No Entry signs are clearly visible on approach,
       so advance warning is not so important.
       It is quite clear here that the council have failed in their
       duty under LATOR Regulation 18, to place adequate signage for
       the restriction. This may be because signage on the Great West
       Road is the responsibility of Transport for London, and the
       council have failed to involve TfL in the signing of this
       restriction, or indeed, to even engage in consultations with
       them in accordance with LATOR Regulation 6
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/2489/contents
       #Post#: 52221--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: Raj
       Date: January 7, 2025, 1:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Google and Apple Maps haven’t updated yet. This new road layout
       is setup around the end of nov 2024 I believe.
  HTML https://www.hammersmithsociety.org.uk/rivercourt-road-a-new-two-way-ltn/.
       Another point of appeal could be the lack of new turning circle/
       bay for reversing out of the road. But for this argument,
       footage of subject pausing at the entrance or attempts to turn
       back would prove a strong case.
       #Post#: 52222--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: January 7, 2025, 3:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Has the OP posted the video?
       #Post#: 52227--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Rivercourt road 52M
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 7, 2025, 3:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > Has the OP posted the video?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       No, but I looked at it using the info on the PCN, and it shows
       the OP driving in without any hesitation.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page