DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 59376--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: February 23, 2025, 4:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
No requirement for 2 signs:
See 13.10.3 (which gives a reflection of the law but is not law
in itself)
HTML https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/782724/traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03.pdf
The law is:
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/2489/regulation/18/made
See s18.1(a).
'..authority may consider requisite for securing that adequate
information as to the effect of the order is made available to
persons using the road;'
#Post#: 59416--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: February 23, 2025, 12:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Miffed link ---
>
> The smoothie was made by my sister, and the vomiting that
night was unexplained, it was only a few days later that I
learnt about adverse reactions to spirulina.
>
--- End Quote ---
Again, what evidence do you have to support this? As a last
resort it may have to come down to a witness statement from your
sister, but the reason I mention this is illustrated here
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/ealing-cumberland-road-w7-code-53j-failing-to-comply-with-a-restriction-on-vehic/msg56444/#msg56444,<br
/>the most recent outcome based on this was Nashrin Master v
London Borough of Hackney (2240537076, 19 February 2025)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hu-p41Pvxehyuky0GpFJ7bt6_YdR-tuy/view.<br
/>This gives you another angle of attack entirely separate from
the signage issues, and having two grounds of appeal is much
better than just having one.
#Post#: 59516--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: Miffed
Date: February 24, 2025, 10:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
The only evidence i'd have would be a witness statement from my
sister, and as I haven't mentioned it during this process except
on here, would that not be acceptable to mention it at this late
stage now?
#Post#: 59543--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: February 24, 2025, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Miffed link ---
>
> The only evidence i'd have would be a witness statement from
my sister, and as I haven't mentioned it during this process
except on here, would that not be acceptable to mention it at
this late stage now?
>
--- End Quote ---
It's not that late, you're still at the representations stage. A
witness statement must provide the full name and address of the
witness, if you're happy putting something together then great,
if not please PM me and I'll do my best to assist.
The main point of getting a statement (or any document for that
matter) is illustrated by the case of Nashrin Master v London
Borough of Hackney (2240537076, 19 February 2025)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hu-p41Pvxehyuky0GpFJ7bt6_YdR-tuy/view.
#Post#: 88793--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 7, 2025, 10:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gqIXXyQhPeuUOfkqDzKbmKKv1sqsAzcD/view.
#Post#: 88798--------------------------------------------------
Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: September 7, 2025, 11:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As I posted earlier:
OP, probably as many appeals to the adjudicator are won on
procedural grounds arising from a Notice of Rejection of formal
representations as are won on more standard issues e.g.
contravention did not occur, inadequate signage etc.
And yours is a case in point.
Dreadful performance by council officers who can't submit proper
evidence, and good support from cp.
But don't rely on the former, sometimes they get it right
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 5
DIR Previous Page