URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 51626--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 1, 2025, 2:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Miffed link ---
       >
       > So, unless there's an error in the parking order, it looks
       like pursuing an appeal is a waste of time.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There might also be an issue in Harrow's enforcement process,
       most appeals are won on technical grounds of this sort.
       #Post#: 51628--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: Miffed
       Date: January 1, 2025, 3:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Once again, I'm grateful for all the input and the different
       people weighing in.
       #Post#: 51639--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: January 2, 2025, 2:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's an example of a PPA order:
  HTML https://www.harrow.gov.uk/downloads/file/32553/22_25_Accessibility_documents_approved___FINAL.pdf
       #Post#: 52181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 6, 2025, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For later:
       The Harrow (Parking Places) Traffic Order 2020
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JA7T805jfccPCmSK4dp53N7vSvcnk-LP/view
       The Harrow (Parking Places) (Amendment No. 16) Traffic Order
       2022
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GMho5gCgSxN-qCiT7ijsIUAfMfCqkdnl/view
       #Post#: 52375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: Miffed
       Date: January 8, 2025, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello again,
       Does that order look to be faulty in any way? I'm completely
       surprised to see it's been in effect since 2022,and I'm certain
       I will have parked there since then, again, unaware of this
       change.
       I've just received the notice rejecting my appeal, which was
       expected.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/fV7VMS3.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/00FYfOG.jpeg
       #Post#: 52445--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: January 8, 2025, 8:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From what I can see, you were parked within a parking place
       defined by item 3 in Table 1. The order seems to cover each of
       the parking place areas although the residents of 101 to 107
       might be surprised to know that GL permit holders could park by
       their dropped footways.
       Technically the contravention alleged in your case is incorrect.
       The order allows a range of permit holders to park, not just GL
       residents permit holders. But on its own I doubt this would
       persuade an adjudicator, see what others post.
       Their response to your reps is numerically illiterate as it
       states that they could serve a NTO when the discount is still
       available..
       '[pay £55]within 14 days of' 3 Jan is 17th....
       whereas '[pay £110] within 28 days of date of PCN' is 15th at
       which time they could serve a NTO demanding £110 from the owner
       despite £55 being the penalty until 17th.
       But again this is unlikely to win on its on.
       #Post#: 52522--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 8, 2025, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As long as you challenge the NTO within 14 days of the date of
       issue the discount is normally reoffered anyway upon rejection,
       so there's limited risk in carrying on.
       #Post#: 53058--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: Miffed
       Date: January 12, 2025, 8:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello again,
       Given that the previous appeal posted here did fail, and the
       challenge I've made against the pcn was rejected for a similar
       reason is it worth going further, if they're already minded to
       reject?
       Is there any faulty element of either the traffic order or the
       pcn? And if not, should I just give in?
       #Post#: 53060--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: January 12, 2025, 8:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, probably as many appeals to the adjudicator are won on
       procedural grounds arising from a Notice of Rejection of formal
       representations as are won on more standard issues e.g.
       contravention did not occur, inadequate signage etc.
       But you don't have a NOR and won't get one unless you make
       formal reps against a NTO and cp suggests this could be
       financially risk-free as regards your current situation i.e.
       discount being re-offered.
       Which would seem to lead to ...make formal reps within 14 days
       beginning on date of service of a NTO.
       #Post#: 53067--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PPA ZONE but no signs at bays
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: January 12, 2025, 10:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=3865]Miffed[/member] the council always rejects
       everything, that's not really the point. Once you appeal to the
       tribunal it's no longer up to them, and the odds are in your
       favour: probably a third of appeals are not resisted by
       authorities, a third are won and a third are lost, so you have a
       2 in 3 chance of a positive outcome even if you didn't have any
       assistance from anyone.
       On top of that, motorists who are represented by one of us
       regularly win in 90%+ of cases. If the Notice of Rejection turns
       out to be procedurally defective, you could have a winning
       appeal no matter what the signage situation is.
       So frankly it would be a bit silly to give in and pay now.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page