DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
*****************************************************
#Post#: 53068--------------------------------------------------
Re: Alleged speeding A30 Plusha jct with B3257
DIR By: coffee pot
Date: January 12, 2025, 11:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So I have done their work for them and found evidence that there
was an apparently watertight restriction in place, and have now
been offered a NSAS course - which is fair enough, I guess.
Thank you.
#Post#: 53070--------------------------------------------------
Re: Alleged speeding A30 Plusha jct with B3257
DIR By: NewJudge
Date: January 12, 2025, 11:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> So I have done their work for them and found evidence that
there was an apparently watertight restriction in place,...
--- End Quote ---
Whose work have you done? I don't think the police needed
confirmation that a restriction was in place. They didn't seem
to be in any doubt and didn't need any evidence at this stage
anyway.
#Post#: 53113--------------------------------------------------
Re: Alleged speeding A30 Plusha jct with B3257
DIR By: coffee pot
Date: January 13, 2025, 1:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not about to ask a judge to suck eggs, but it was the
evidence that there was a temporary restriction correctly
instituted that I required. In my experience Police Officers are
rarely in any doubt, and I wouldn't take legal advice from one.
The paperwork is interestingly geared to insisting you have done
wrong and directing you down a path to admit it, rather than
making an allegation and providing all the evidence to back that
up. I recognise that had I contested the allegation the evidence
would (may) have been presented, but again, you are dissuaded
from normal Court activity by the variable penalties for
different responses to the allegation. I went and found the
relevant evidence, which is required at this early stage despite
the fact that all I am presented with is an allegation. Just
sometimes it turns out that some part of the process has not
been correctly carried out, such as Clarke v CPS 2013 EWHC 366
(Admin). I am now satisfied that the order was in place, and
this forum helped me with the missing link which was what that
order was and how it may be found.
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 3
DIR Previous Page