URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 61615--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: correcthaunt
       Date: March 10, 2025, 7:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi [member=1]cp8759[/member],
       I hope all is well.
       --- Quote ---
       > I think we can't really do anything until the 30 January
       deadline has expired.
       --- End Quote ---
       Unsurprisingly the council has never responded to my request for
       information.
       They have never registered this debt either. All 4 of the below
       PCNs are still showing as £195.
       #1 PN75748188 – paid and case closed
       #2 PN75748213 – paid and case closed
       #3 PN76007402 – This is what the post is about re Albert Way
       #4 PN62628875 – never knew about this until they mentioned it in
       the e-mail when dealing with #1 and #2 as council sent it to a
       wrong address.
       #5 PN62645400 – never knew about this until they mentioned it in
       the e-mail when dealing with #1 and #2 as council sent it to a
       wrong address.
       #6 PN62647643 – never knew about this until they mentioned it in
       the e-mail when dealing with #1 and #2 as council sent it to a
       wrong address.
       I am honestly not sure how to handle this now. I am worried that
       leaving this will come back and bite me in the future but also
       don’t want to necessary force them to handle this and just wait
       the 6 years until the statutory limitation is up.
       #Post#: 61648--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: March 10, 2025, 9:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=3455]correcthaunt[/member] in practice if the council
       tried to register the debt after the six years have expired, the
       debt would still get registered as TEC just follows a tick-box
       exercise and nothing in their process tells them to check if the
       debt is over six years old. So unless you get Newham to cancel
       the PCN, this could be hanging over you for the rest of time.
       I suggest you make a complaint asking them to issue an Order for
       Recovery for each of the outstanding PCNs, otherwise this matter
       could stay open for years.
  HTML https://www.newham.gov.uk/contact-information/make-complaint/2
       You must make it clear that you are not complaining about the
       PCNs as such, just about the fact that there's been such a huge
       delay in the council taking the next step in the statutory
       process. The complaint outcome you should ask for is for the
       Order for Recovery to be issued for each PCN.
       #Post#: 61650--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: correcthaunt
       Date: March 10, 2025, 9:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi [member=1]cp8759[/member],
       Thank you for your prompt response and understood.
       Before making the formal complaint, should I follow up with them
       regarding the information request they simply ignored?
       As you may recall, I have reached out to them to get a copy of
       their response for my appeal but they never sent one nor sent me
       the copy (even though they provided copies for the other 3).
       #Post#: 61661--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: March 10, 2025, 10:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=3455]correcthaunt[/member] as far as I can see from the
       thread above, they never issued a rejection to your
       representations because for whatever reason they never receive
       the representations. They obviously can't provide a copy of a
       document that doesn't exist and there's no point in
       recriminating with them about whether they did or didn't receive
       the representations and whether a notice of rejection should or
       shouldn't exist. At this point you just want things to move
       along.
       #Post#: 68988--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: correcthaunt
       Date: April 28, 2025, 5:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi [member=1]cp8759[/member],
       I hope you are well.
       You are correct in saying that there is no point in going back
       and forwards with the council. That said I do have proof of
       sending both the physical and electric copies, which I kept just
       in case I do need to use is/show it in court. Everything is in
       this thread as a backup too.
       Quick update on the 3 from 2021 - Barking Rd/ Opp Oak Crescent :
       #4 PN62628875
       #5 PN62645400
       #6 PN62647643
       Nothing has changed here, these are still showing as £195 GBP
       and after 4 years it was still not registered. I might make that
       complaint to move this along.
       Now, the Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions Rd i.e. the main one.
       On the 6th of January I have received the below letter from the
       council suggesting to reach out if I am struggling financially
       to pay the £195 GBP. This is fully documented in my Reply #6 on
       from January 08, 2025, 05:48:16 pm.
       Fast forward to now and I just got the letter (issued 22nd of
       April 2025) from the court saying that the debt has been
       registered.
       Here is the Letter:
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/G8c7NnFh/Order-for-Recovery.png
  HTML https://postimg.cc/G8c7NnFh
       Here is the updated price to £205.
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/Y4NDbCms/PCN-Review-Updated.png
  HTML https://postimg.cc/Y4NDbCms
       
       I read through the options and it looks like the “2. You made
       representations about the penalty charge to the local authority
       concerned within 28 days of service of notice to owner /
       Enforcement Notice / Penalty Charge Notice and you did not
       receive a rejection notice.” option is the one applicable here.
       Thus my questions:
       1.
       2.
       which court London court can I go to?
       a.
       Judge to take affidavits/Justice of the Peace – do I just ask
       for one in any court?
       3.
       As always, your help is greatly appreciated.
       #Post#: 68994--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 28, 2025, 6:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please read the guide here:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificates-london-local-authorities-and-tfl-act-2003-london-l-1805/
       It hopefully tells you everything you need to know. The key
       issues are: don't miss the deadlines, and send all the documents
       to TEC by email rather than by post.
       Once you've read the guide please let me know if you have any
       questions.
       #Post#: 69023--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: correcthaunt
       Date: April 28, 2025, 8:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for your prompt response @cp8759.
       I have 1 quick question on the following "If you get an Order
       for Recovery and a printed PE3 form before you have emailed the
       sworn PE3 form to TEC, you should fill it in, get it sworn and
       email it to the tec mailbox as soon as possible."
       I do not physically have the copy as this was posted to Bristol
       and I am in London today.
       My 2 questions:
       1. Can't I just print one from the internet and have this
       witness and then submitted? Or does it have to be the one the
       issued?
       2. Do I need to get the justice of the peace to witness the
       Order for Recovery too?
       As soon as I have your confirmation, I will go to the Stratford
       Magistrates' Court and Family Court and ask for a justice of the
       peace appointment.
       #Post#: 69122--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 28, 2025, 6:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can print form PE3 yourself, there's no need to use the one
       they posted, you just need to make sure you fill it in
       correctly.
       Only form PE3 needs to be witnessed as this is the form you're
       going to email back to the tec mailbox, the Order for Recovery
       isn't something that needs to be witnessed or sent anywhere. A
       county court officer can witness the form and it'll be easier to
       get an appointment for that, as justices of the peace can
       witness form PE3 but odds are they never have and they would not
       be familiar with the process.
       #Post#: 69123--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 28, 2025, 6:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For Form PE3, do remember when filling it in, that the
       "Applicant", (see top right of form) is the council. You are the
       "Respondent"
       #Post#: 69134--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on
       certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
   DIR By: correcthaunt
       Date: April 29, 2025, 12:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi [member=1]cp8759[/member] & [member=12]Incandescent[/member],
       Thanks for getting back to me and I will get the PE3 witnessed
       by someone at the court. I will ask around at the Stratford
       Magistrates' Court and Family Court as I am sure they do these a
       lot there given how awful Newham council is. If not then I will
       go to the Royal Courts of Justice and ask around there.
       With regards to the form itself, I had printed a blank one
       months ago in anticipation of needing to do this, so now I will
       fill it in identically to how they’ve posted it. Once I have it
       all signed I will post a quick picture to confirm all good
       before sending over to tec@justice.gov.uk.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page