DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 51989--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: January 5, 2025, 7:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> OP, at this atage you simply register your appeal, I suggest
under the grounds of Contravention did not occur and Procedural
Impropriety. You add the body of your argument later.
>
> While you're doing this, there's still an aspect of the events
that hasn't been explained as far as I can see. You parked, you
left the car in order to go to the shop to collect the
bathtub..and you then returned empty-handed to photograph the
CEO.
>
> Why?
>
> Where was the bathtub?
>
--- End Quote ---
There is window on the side of the shop from which I could see
the car. When I was at the counter I saw CEO at the car so went
out straightaway. Told CEO I am here for loading and he said
that's not allowed and have to park at rear (where there wasn't
any space). I had to come back to collect the bathtub when
there was parking available at rear.
#Post#: 51992--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: January 5, 2025, 7:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone know if there is an issue with Parking Adjudicator
website www.londontribunals.gov.uk ?
I was trying to submit yesterday and got the below and still
getting the same
"Service not available
The service is currently unavailable due to planned maintenance
work and will resume as soon as possible
We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause"
#Post#: 52535--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: mickR
Date: January 8, 2025, 5:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think you answered your own question there
#Post#: 52584--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: Grant Urismo
Date: January 9, 2025, 4:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Take a screenshot of that message, it might prove useful later.
#Post#: 52588--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: sx4
Date: January 9, 2025, 5:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Just a thought.
Prevented from serving a Pcn can come in different forms ,
either driving away before Pcn was fully prepared, or the
driver or passenger was threatening the CEO so he felt unsafe to
carry on issuing the Pcn at that time.
The only way to clarify the circumstances is to see the CEOs
notes to explain why a Pcn was not issued at the time.
#Post#: 65130--------------------------------------------------
URGENT Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road
Ilford IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: April 1, 2025, 5:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I took this to Tribunal and they refused. Require urgent
feedback please on how to proceed before council instructs
bailiffs. Thanks
Main points I picked up were:
- council officer claims vehicle "Volvo Jazz" was incapable of
holding a bathtub.
Volvo Jazz does not exist. Vehicle was Volco XC90 which is more
than large enough to hold a bathtub as I have transported in my
own XC90 many times.
- council officer claims receipt was fake because missing client
name and address and so deemed fake
this was an independent shop which does not issue such receipts.
Further even Wickes doesn't issue such receipts. They are
accusing me and shop of lying and fabricating receipt
- council officer noted no loading was observed
loading was to occur as I had only gotten to the service counter
when the CEO arrived
Decision notice:
HTML https://ibb.co/BKQy1FRs
Redbridge pack:
HTML https://smallpdf.com/file#r=annotate
#Post#: 65135--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: April 1, 2025, 6:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You made a big mistake in not attending the hearing as
credibility is often satisfied then.
You could ask for a review but it will probably be refused but
others may find something to go on.
Otherwise best to pay and move on.
HTML https://i.ibb.co/9RWgPzz/image.png
#Post#: 65140--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: April 1, 2025, 6:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=2249]stamfordman[/member] yes I intended to attend but
couldn't for personal reasons. Agreed it would have been better
but can't do anything about it now. I did inform them a week in
advance.
#Post#: 65402--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: April 2, 2025, 8:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello, does anyone have further comments about this and
suggestion on how best to proceed. Want to address before they
start escalating.
Otherwise will reluctantly pay but miffed about them saying
invoices fabricated.
Thanks
#Post#: 65410--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: April 2, 2025, 8:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It was your evidence which the adjudicator considered and found
as a fact that you did not produce a bona fide invoice/receipt,
nothing to do with the authority who it appears took the same
view.
I would have thought that 'a week in advance' would have been
sufficient for 'personal reasons', but it's difficult to comment
as we've not seen your request.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 7
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page