DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 49799--------------------------------------------------
Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 14, 2024, 10:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello
I have received PCN on a hire vehicle (first link below).
I was parked next to a bathroom shop with hazards on for loading
of large item, corner of Ley Street and Cranley Road.
The PCN states that I drove the vehicle away which as shown in
the photos (links below) is clearly not the case due to the
traffic on the road and the officer was not prevented from
serving PCN. I even stood next to the officer and took a photo
of his uniform in case something like this did happen. He did
not attempt to give me a PCN.
Please advise on grounds I can appeal this PCN. Thanks
HTML https://ibb.co/NmHdccw
HTML https://ibb.co/3MWW0kM
HTML https://ibb.co/tCpr8Pd
HTML https://ibb.co/Z1z9M48
HTML https://ibb.co/Tw7k1df
HTML https://ibb.co/gmVpv8p
#Post#: 49801--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: December 14, 2024, 10:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Does the PCN carry your name and address?
What is the lease company's policy (see agreement/ T&C) with
regard to PCNs?
#Post#: 49807--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 14, 2024, 10:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes the PCN carries my name and address.
The following clause is in the agreement for Renter obligations:
(viii) pay any administrative fines, fees, charges, costs,
penalties, or other fines that are imposed, issued or incurred
in connection with the Renter's usage of the Vehicle during the
Rental Period (including usage of the Vehicle by Authorised
Drivers or other third parties who are permitted by Renter to
use the Vehicle), such as fines or fees for illegal parking or
speeding, non-compliance with bus lane, congestion charges,
tolls or violations of the rules of the highway or traffic
offence or contravention in any country, in all cases, to the
extent permitted by law and not caused by Owner;
Below is the letter contents sent to me by email on 25 October
2024.
Dear Customer,
We were recently notified about a traffic violation notice for a
vehicle rented to you at the time of the offence. As per our
rental agreement, we are notifying you of your liability.
As the owners of the vehicle, we are required to provide the
hirer details to the relevant issuing authority who will in turn
re-issue the fine to you. Once you have received this you will
be able to respond, pay or appeal directly to the authority.
Please note that if the reduced amount of the fine is
applicable, you will still have the opportunity to pay this when
the fine is reissued to you.
In the case of speeding offences, once the fine is reissued, you
will need to respond to the Police directly using the form they
provide. As a reminder, your signature on the rental contract
gives Enterprise full authorisation to process any applicable
charges for associated administration fees.
We will attempt to charge the card used for the vehicle hire.
Note: The administration fee is NOT part or full payment of the
fine. You will need to pay the fine separately. Details of the
offence and your rental agreement are listed below.
Full details will be available once the fine is reissued to you.
Yours Sincerely,
Traffic Violations Department
Enterprise Mobility
Operating
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
National Car Rental
Alamo Rent-A-Car
Reference ID : 100582950
Issuing Agency : London Borough of Redbridge
Citation Number : AF08101513
Citation Issue Date/Time : 16/10/2024 @ 12:55
Location Of Offense : CRANLEY ROAD
Plate Number : RF24ZBT
Admin Fee Due : £35.00
Violation Type : PARKING
Enterprise will not pay the charge. You will be able to respond,
pay or appeal directly to the authority when you receive the
notice.
If you have any querie
#Post#: 49808--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 14, 2024, 10:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Note one of the photos on the PCN website shows me arriving to
the car so clearly did not prevent a PCN being issued or affixed
to the car.
#Post#: 49812--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: December 14, 2024, 11:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Date of Service deemed 4th.December = day 1 of 14day period for
submitting reps inside discount period.
Please post a draft of why you think this PCN should be
cancelled and post here for comment before submitting - but do
not miss deadline.
#Post#: 49833--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 14, 2024, 3:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Draft of reps:
The vehicle was parked with hazards on next to a plumbing store
for loading of heavy items. There is no signage relating to the
location parked not permitting this activity. Furthermore the
PCN alleges vehicle was driven away before CEO had finished
preparing PCN or was prevented from serving. I have photos as
attached showing that there was traffic on the road which
clearly would have prevented the vehicle from being driven away.
Further the PCN photos show me approaching vehicle to enter.
In addition I have taken photo of the CEO lapel as attached too.
Therefore if CEO wanted to serve PCN in person or affix to
vehicle there was ample opportunity to do so. I cannot
understand why this PCN was raised and what motivation
CEO/London Borough of Redbridge had for stating false
information on the PCN. Therefore I request the PCN be
rescinded with immediate effect. I look forward to your
confirmation of the same.
#Post#: 50051--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 16, 2024, 5:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Conscious of timelines so if anyone has comments on the below
draft please share your feedback. Thanks
#Post#: 50056--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: December 16, 2024, 6:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Looks OK to me. They will reject no matter what you write.
#Post#: 50063--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: December 16, 2024, 7:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
GSV from Oct2020
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/2zoYQU4v9C5gwDAs7
#Post#: 50110--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge, parked in restricted street, Cranley Road Ilford
IG1
DIR By: buscalls
Date: December 16, 2024, 11:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=12]Incandescent[/member] - ie not worth bothering then?
[member=898]NTIAEP[/member] - Does this sign apply to the
opposite side too (side of plumbing shop facing Ley St)?
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 7
DIR Next Page