URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 48662--------------------------------------------------
       Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: December 6, 2024, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Need your help again folks. The driver went in for an urgent
       care appointment with a Doctor (at 1AM on 02-Dec-2024) at King's
       College Hospital but they decided to escalate their medical
       condition urgent enough to warrant an A&E admission. They ended
       up getting discharged past 12 PM (02-Dec-2024).
       The driver of course thought it would not be an issue since free
       parking was permitted till 08:30 AM in the bay.
       Since they were admitted to A&E they could not leave and move
       the car!
       What grounds for appeal exist since the adjudicator cannot
       consider mitigating circumstances and the council is unlikely to
       accept this as an appeal ground?
       Are the following grounds for appeal valid?
       [1] Procedural irregularity: The contravention code seems to be
       stated as 124 at the bottom of the PCN. This is not a valid
       contravention code.
       [2] The PCN states Caldecot Road (A). There is no valid TMO
       which goes by the name of Caldecot Road with the suffix (A) in
       the road name.
       [3] No observation period was is stated on the PCN Lambeth Civil
       Enforcement Officers Handbook states that an observation period
       of 5 minutes should be maintained prior to issuing a
       contravention with code 12.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/VPJFM1U.png
       With regards to [3], the PCN website states the observation
       period of 6 minutes but this is not stated on the PCN. How would
       they evidence this?
       I appreciate your help in dealing with this PCN.
       PCN as below
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/q57mXEi.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/KvWG1c2.png
       PCN signage
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/fYghy7Z.png
       #Post#: 48665--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: December 6, 2024, 12:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lambeth may cancel this if you provide evidence that
       circumstances meant it was beyond your control to move the car.
       This is an appeal ground that is accepted at the tribunal.
       #Post#: 48668--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: December 6, 2024, 12:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
       >
       > Lambeth may cancel this if you provide evidence that
       circumstances meant it was beyond your control to move the car.
       This is an appeal ground that is accepted at the tribunal.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I really hope so but would hope to include some stronger points
       of appeal.
       IMHO, Lambeth Council has been very unethical in the past with
       their bus lane entrapment (issuing a PCN the moment someone
       leaves the car park of a hotel on Lambeth Road) with no signs
       whatsoever:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2Ruq-nHpi0&lc=z22wyhp5exmlvl31hacdp435jaexarpepev4otfxe2xw03c010c.1552657006198256
       #Post#: 48674--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: December 6, 2024, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Post below modified to remove case references as they were
       incorrect!
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am writing to formally challenge the above Penalty Charge
       Notice (PCN) issued on 02 December 2024 for an alleged parking
       contravention at [Location]. Upon review, I believe the PCN is
       invalid due to procedural impropriety and compelling mitigating
       circumstances, as outlined below.
       Grounds for Appeal are described in detail below.
       Invalid Contravention Code
       The PCN cites contravention code "124." However, this code is
       not recognised as a valid contravention code under the standard
       list of parking contraventions issued by London Councils. The
       use of this non-existent code fails to clearly and accurately
       state the grounds for the alleged contravention, as required by
       Regulation 8(1)(b) of the Civil Enforcement of Parking
       Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007.
       Procedural Impropriety
       The incorrect use of contravention code 124 constitutes a
       procedural impropriety under the Traffic Management Act 2004.
       Enforcement authorities are obligated to issue PCNs that adhere
       to statutory requirements and clearly describe the alleged
       contravention. By failing to use a valid and recognised code,
       the council has breached its duty to ensure accuracy in its
       enforcement process.
       Exceptional Mitigating Circumstances
       On the night of 02 December 2024, the driver parked in a bay
       near King’s College Hospital for an urgent care appointment
       scheduled at 1:00 AM. During the consultation, the attending
       doctor deemed the driver’s medical condition serious enough to
       require immediate admission to the hospital's Accident and
       Emergency (A&E) department. The driver was subsequently admitted
       and discharged only after 12:00 PM later that day.
       The driver initially believed that leaving the car in the bay
       would not be an issue since free parking was permitted until
       8:30 AM. However, due to their unexpected admission to A&E, they
       were unable to move the vehicle before the restriction began.
       Under the circumstances, it was impossible for the driver to
       comply with the parking restrictions without jeopardising their
       health and safety. Medical emergencies, such as this, are widely
       recognised as mitigating circumstances under parking enforcement
       policies, and I urge you to cancel this PCN in light of the
       situation.
       Precedent Cases Supporting Procedural Impropriety
       Similar cases have been adjudicated in favour of appellants
       where the contravention code was incorrect or unclear:
       Case Reference: 2130536181: The adjudicator ruled that
       an incorrect contravention code invalidates the PCN due to
       procedural impropriety.
       Case Reference: 2140236182: A mismatch between the
       contravention code and the actual restriction at the location
       was deemed a failure in enforcement procedure, leading to the
       appeal being upheld.
       Request for Evidence
       I kindly request that you provide the following:
       Confirmation of the validity and applicability of
       contravention code 124 under the London Councils standard list.
       Request for Cancellation
       Given the procedural impropriety outlined above and the
       compelling mitigating circumstances due to a medical emergency,
       I respectfully request that the PCN be cancelled.
       I am happy to provide supporting evidence, including medical
       records or a hospital discharge letter, if required. I look
       forward to receiving your response. Should the council choose
       not to cancel the PCN, I reserve the right to escalate this
       matter to the London Tribunals Parking and Traffic Adjudicators.
       #Post#: 48678--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: December 6, 2024, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ?? IMO.
       There is no PI, the regs only require:
       c)the grounds on which the civil enforcement officer issuing the
       notice believes that a penalty charge is payable,
       The purely administrative code is not mandated.
       I cannot find either of your cited cases.
       What hard evidence do you have of these circumstances beyond the
       driver's control?
       #Post#: 48681--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: December 6, 2024, 1:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > What hard evidence do you have of these circumstances beyond
       the driver's control?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       A&E admission and discharge notes.
       Phone call logs to 111 which led to the appointment.
       #Post#: 48683--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: December 6, 2024, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, I think you are being needlessly confrontational in your
       informal challenge. The time to put their hand to the fire is
       not at this early stage.  I suggest you re-write your reps to
       explain the circumstances annd request that the PCN be
       cancelled. If they prove obdurate then more forceful formal reps
       can be submitted against the Notice to Owner.
       #Post#: 48684--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: December 6, 2024, 1:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The suffix 4 after code 12 just means no virtual permit.
       I would forget about everything but a challenge on exceptional
       circumstances. If you were kept into A&E you couldn't move the
       car. Here's the evidence.
       Keep it short and simple.
       #Post#: 54073--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: January 19, 2025, 1:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks everyone. Upon checking the status of the PCN, I noticed
       it has been closed.
       They didn't send a letter or anything, just closed the PCN
       directly.
       #Post#: 54080--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth PCN - Went in for Urgent Care appointment but got
       admitted to A&E
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: January 19, 2025, 1:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FaeLLe link ---
       >
       > Thanks everyone. Upon checking the status of the PCN, I
       noticed it has been closed.
       > They didn't send a letter or anything, just closed the PCN
       directly.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       A bit belt & braces, but take a screenshot and keep a hard copy
       safe.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1