DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 52013--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL Bus Lane - 9 Seater (8 passengers)
   DIR By: baroudeur
       Date: January 5, 2025, 10:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Your vehicle having 8 passenger seats plus the driver is a car
       and cannot use bus lanes.
       With 9 to 16 passenger seats plus driver it is a mini bus.
       #Post#: 52124--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL Bus Lane - 9 Seater (8 passengers)
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 6, 2025, 8:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Pm to be sent.
       #Post#: 52253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL Bus Lane - 9 Seater (8 passengers)
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 7, 2025, 6:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Penalty Charge Notice is unenforceable because:
       1. The reference to The Interpretation Act is both irrelevant
       and confusing as the legislation pertaining to Bus Lane
       enforcement refers to actions which may be taken by the
       authority and/or appellant from the date of the notice.
       2. The statement: "Any written correspondence before the issue
       of the Enforcement Notice will not be treated as a formal
       representation." fetters discretion and is contrary to the
       legislation in that it clearly implies that you will send an
       Enforcement Notice when the legislation states "may" at 4(3)(e)
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/1996/9/section/4/enacted
       3. The statement: "It will not entitle you to the right of
       appeal." is both absurd and flies in the face of the law and
       natural justice. Further, the next statement about consideration
       seems to contradict what has been previously stated.
       4. The statement: "Failure to respond or contact us within 28
       days of the service date of this notice will result in the
       Enforcement Notice automatically being sent to you after this
       period." similarly fetters discretion and also misstates the
       time period.
       Request for the video if not received
       I ask for a copy asap please.
       The alleged contravention did not occur
       The embedded photograph on the PCN  lacks any proof of relevant
       signage either passed or in situ.
       The Enforcement Notice
       I make these further formal representations:
       1. The Enforcement Notice, as does the PCN, mistakenly states
       Ground 4(2)(c) provided at Schedule I. It clearly limits to
       theft.
       2. The Enforcement Notice describes itself as a PCN with regard
       to the Interpretation Act.
       Camera authorisation
       I put you to strict proof that the camera used to capture the
       alleged contravention has the correct certification. If this is
       not forthcoming, this will be another ground of appeal.
       In light of the above, please cancel the PCN,
       Name
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page