DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 56427--------------------------------------------------
       Re: *Split from hijacked thread* - Re: Harrow Camrose Avenue Bus
       Gate 33E
   DIR By: Bustagate
       Date: February 3, 2025, 12:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for correcting my terminology about a failure to
       consider. The appeal has gone in with a brief set of bullet
       points comprising the grounds in the representations, the
       failure to consider and, as an additional ground, failure to
       ensure that the sign advising the use of Traffic Enforcement
       Cameras was visible.
       I attach a draft of the main submission. Comments and
       suggestions for improvement welcome.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 57145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: *Split from hijacked thread* - Re: Harrow Camrose Avenue Bus
       Gate 33E
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: February 7, 2025, 2:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       • contrary to the Home Office’s Surveillance Camera Code of
       Practice, there is no
       visible warning of the use of traffic enforcement cameras;
       Forget this.
       I would use the decisions and am happy to give you privately the
       submissions I made.  I know you want your day in Court;
       but,.............
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page