DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 48381--------------------------------------------------
ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: JohnBravo
Date: December 4, 2024, 5:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I had a pleasure with Parking Eye in the past.
Now they sent me a ticket for paid private parking. It seems
they have a working camera but payment machine isn't working but
I don't have an evidence the machine was faulty.
Basically one button to type in the number plate was abused to
the point it didn't work.
Where can I find the right email address or address to mail
Sports Direct a request to cancel the ticket?
#Post#: 48382--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: December 4, 2024, 6:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If you would like help with any appeals, please read the
following thread carefully and provide as much of the
information it asks for as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST -
Private Parking Charges Forum guide
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/
--- Quote from: JohnBravo link ---
>
> Where can I find the right email address or address to mail
Sports Direct a request to cancel the ticket?
>
--- End Quote ---
We don't maintain a database of landowner/retailer details. If
you're able to visit the store in question and speak to a
manager that's a good starting point. If not, see what you can
find on Google.
#Post#: 51110--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: JohnBravo
Date: December 27, 2024, 11:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I was mistaken, it's not ParkingEye but CP Plus Limited.
I think while I was reading this letter I saw ParkingEye vs
Beavis mentioned and my faulty brain just picked it up.
I have contacted DirectSports and they did come back to me
saying it's not their land apparently.
#Post#: 51115--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: mickR
Date: December 27, 2024, 1:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
and all the relevant info ???
#Post#: 51210--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: JohnBravo
Date: December 28, 2024, 12:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Apologies for not attaching the actual letter.
HTML https://i.ibb.co/fvcn8Fp/1a.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/NS4m1Cj
HTML https://i.ibb.co/ph7PMcX/2a.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/CPctYg0
#Post#: 51229--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: b789
Date: December 28, 2024, 3:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That's the reminder. We need to see the original Notice to
Keeper (NtK) making sure that all dates and times remain
visible.
#Post#: 52732--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: JohnBravo
Date: January 9, 2025, 11:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Apologies but been ill for all this time.
HTML https://i.ibb.co/nb9z985/30.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/G0ycy3b
HTML https://i.ibb.co/mSdw4G9/31.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/pnN8dxf
#Post#: 52792--------------------------------------------------
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
DIR By: b789
Date: January 10, 2025, 6:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You can appeal that the Notice to Keeper (NtK) is not fully
complaint with ALL the requirements of PoFA and therefore the
Keeper cannot be liable. CP Plus have no idea of the drivers
identity unless the Keeper bias it to them, inadvertently or
otherwise.
There is no legal obligation on the Keeper to identify the
driver to an unregulated private parking company.
The PoFA failure is that there is no clear invitation for the
Keeper to pay the charge. There has to be a clear "invitation"
or at least a synonym of the word, for the Keeper to pay the
charge. Inference is not enough. CP Plus will reject any appeal.
Unfortunately, POPLA assessors are moronic when it comes to this
argument and conveniently ignoring subsection (i) of Paragraph
9(2)(e) of PoFA.
As long as the unknown drivers identity is not revealed. There
is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the
Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown
driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.
The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which
means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot
transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the
known keeper.
Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove
anything from it:
--- Quote ---
> I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
client landowner.
>
> As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
can be drawn. Horizon has relied on contract law allegations of
breach against the driver only.
>
> The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
Horizon have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both
a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
--- End Quote ---
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1