URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 47743--------------------------------------------------
       Changes in N180DQ process?
   DIR By: bz.08
       Date: December 1, 2024, 11:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       I've followed the valuable advice on this forum for a few
       private parking cases this year resulting in me winning one case
       in court and "winning" another via withdrawal of the solicitors.
       I am at the N180 form step now for another alleged contravention
       (which dates back to 2022) but I noticed this form has changed
       vs earlier this year. The main change I see is the addition of
       the mediation section. I understand that I must sign up for the
       mediation which will just be a phone call where I'd pledge £0.
       I have two questions:
       1) As part of their DQ pack they sent to me, DCB Legal asked me
       to contact them directly within 7 days of their letter (this
       deadline has passed) if I wanted to discuss settlement - I
       assume I can ignore this as I am going through mediation via the
       N180DQ?
       2) The defendant in this case is actually my father but if it
       got to court (if DCB actually takes it that far), I think he'd
       struggle with the complex legal jargon the judge uses and he'd
       probably struggle to articulate a coherent defence in response.
       In light of this, is it better to put myself down as a witness
       or as a translator? My Dad speaks English and doesn't need
       translation anywhere else but just want to help him out if need
       be. I guess putting myself down as a witness would be
       acknowledgment that we were at the scene of the alleged
       contravention so maybe putting down translator is better?
       if there is anything else I need to bear in mind that is
       different now vs 6 months ago then please let me know also.
       Thanks again!
       #Post#: 47756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Changes in N180DQ process?
   DIR By: b789
       Date: December 1, 2024, 12:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In answer to your Q1... yes, ignore DCB Legals's request to
       discuss settlement.
       Regarding your points about the latest N180 DQ, it is only
       mandatory to "attend" the mediation phone call. It is not part
       of the actual judicial process. There is no judge or solicitor
       involved. It is a waste of everybody's time in these types of
       clams.
       As you are already aware, you offer £0 and that is the end of
       the matter. The claim progresses.
       Regarding your Q2... as long as you defended the claim, there is
       a greater than 99% chance that DCB Legal will discontinue before
       they have to pay the trial fee (£27). They rely on the defendant
       to be low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree who is going to
       capitulate and pay up out of ignorance and fear. You are
       obviously neither ignorant nor fearful of the process.
       However, the extremely unlikely event that this ever progressed
       as far as an actual hearing in front of a judge, you could
       represent your father as a Lay Representative. You would only
       need to tell the clerk when you arrive for the hearing that you
       will be the defendants Lay Representative and make sure you take
       a copy of the The Lay Representatives (Rights of Audience) Order
       1999
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1225/made
       to wave in
       their face if they or the judge questions this.
       As a Lay Representative, you may exercise rights of audience in
       proceedings dealt with as a small claim in accordance with rules
       of court.
       As a Lay Representative may not exercise any right of audience
       where the Defendant does not attend the hearing. So, your father
       would need to be present and may have to answer any questions
       that the judge would direct their way. However, you would be
       able to confer with him.
       As a Lay Rep, you cannot be a witness or give evidence, only
       represent the defendant.
       #Post#: 47849--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Changes in N180DQ process?
   DIR By: bz.08
       Date: December 2, 2024, 6:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > In answer to your Q1... yes, ignore DCB Legals's request to
       discuss settlement.
       >
       > Regarding your points about the latest N180 DQ, it is only
       mandatory to "attend" the mediation phone call. It is not part
       of the actual judicial process. There is no judge or solicitor
       involved. It is a waste of everybody's time in these types of
       clams.
       >
       > As you are already aware, you offer £0 and that is the end of
       the matter. The claim progresses.
       >
       > Regarding your Q2... as long as you defended the claim, there
       is a greater than 99% chance that DCB Legal will discontinue
       before they have to pay the trial fee (£27). They rely on the
       defendant to be low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree who is
       going to capitulate and pay up out of ignorance and fear. You
       are obviously neither ignorant nor fearful of the process.
       >
       > However, the extremely unlikely event that this ever
       progressed as far as an actual hearing in front of a judge, you
       could represent your father as a Lay Representative. You would
       only need to tell the clerk when you arrive for the hearing that
       you will be the defendants Lay Representative and make sure you
       take a copy of the The Lay Representatives (Rights of Audience)
       Order 1999
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1225/made
       to wave in
       their face if they or the judge questions this.
       >
       > As a Lay Representative, you may exercise rights of audience
       in proceedings dealt with as a small claim in accordance with
       rules of court.
       >
       > As a Lay Representative may not exercise any right of audience
       where the Defendant does not attend the hearing. So, your father
       would need to be present and may have to answer any questions
       that the judge would direct their way. However, you would be
       able to confer with him.
       >
       > As a Lay Rep, you cannot be a witness or give evidence, only
       represent the defendant.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Very helpful. I will update in here once (hopefully) DCB
       discontinues.
       Thanks again!
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1