URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 56430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: WaltWhite Date: February 3, 2025, 12:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=4018.msg56428#msg56428
       date=1738608219]
       [member=2453]WaltWhite[/member] please email me unredacted
       copies of those and I'll forward them to the LGO.
       [/quote]
       Done
       #Post#: 56436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: H C Andersen Date: February 3, 2025, 1:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The OP said reps were sent, whether they were made is to be
       determined. We don't know to what email address, how this was
       obtained, from whom, with what assurances, if any, their form
       and when.
       OP, pl let's try and establish these details pl.
       Or is this is now off thread?
       #Post#: 56439--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: WaltWhite Date: February 3, 2025, 2:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=H C Andersen link=topic=4018.msg56436#msg56436
       date=1738610776]
       The OP said reps were sent, whether they were made is to be
       determined. We don't know to what email address, how this was
       obtained, from whom, with what assurances, if any, their form
       and when.
       OP, pl let's try and establish these details pl.
       Or is this is now off thread?
       [/quote]
       From page 3 of this thread....
       Given the email address by someone else in this thread
       From:
       Sent: 17 December 2024 23:06
       To: Parking and Traffic Enforcement
       <parkingandtrafficenforcement@redbridge.gov.uk>; Parking and
       Traffic Enforcement <highways.parkingappeals@redbridge.gov.uk>;
       Parking and Traffic Enforcement
       <highways.parkingmanagement@redbridge.gov.uk>
       Subject: Representations AF3....... (tried to submit this via
       website on 15th Dec)
       Dear Sir Madam,
       I am writing to formally challenge the Penalty Charge Notice
       (PCN) number AF...... issued to myself for allegedly failing to
       comply with traffic restrictions on Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1. I
       believe that this charge has been unfairly issued and wish to
       present my case for your consideration.
       Firstly the sign indicating the restriction against traffic is
       not of the 'hinged' type that should be only visible during
       School Term Time. This type of sign has not received
       authorisation as suitable signage to traffic outside of the
       School zone, from the Department of Transport, rending the PCN
       here null and void.
       Secondly when attempting to make an online representation
       against this PCN, the website fetters discretion with regards to
       the grounds allowed. The LB Redbridge website indicates which
       grounds will not be considered here, and a public body should
       not adopt such a rigid policy that prevents it from exercising
       discretion in individual cases. I attach screenshots from the LB
       Redbridge website.
       Finally the online representation page fetters to only one
       ground only for representation. Again this is unfair and does
       not allow for proper consideration of the possible grounds for a
       PCN to be contested. I also attach screenshots from the LB
       Redbridge website.
       I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
       Kind regards,
       #Post#: 56443--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: ivanleo Date: February 3, 2025, 2:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are two requirements for making representations: they must
       be made within 28 days of the date of service, and they must be
       made in the form and manner specified on the PCN. A
       representation made on 17 December 2024 is prima-facie out of
       time, and I'm not aware of the Redbridge PCN allowing
       representations to be made by email, so that would seem to
       defeat both points.
       A complaint is progressing with the Local Government Ombudsman,
       the only other avenue would be a judicial review.
       #Post#: 105942--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: ivanleo Date: January 14, 2026, 4:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Update:
  HTML https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/transport-and-highways/parking-and-other-penalties/24-018-072
       [indent]
       The Council has failed to provide a clear date for
       representations to be received. The information provided on the
       notice is open to ambiguity and has caused Mr Y confusion which
       has led to him being unable to provide representations in time.
       [/indent]
       This obviously doesn't bind adjudicators, but it can be
       persuasive to show that Redbridge's notices are ambiguous.
       #Post#: 106392--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: ivanleo Date: January 18, 2026, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Redbridge have now cancelled the PCN as a "gesture of goodwill".
       #Post#: 106394--------------------------------------------------
       Re: LB Redbridge 53j - Cleveland Rd, Ilford IG1 Failing to compl
       y with restriction on vehicles entering pedest zone (cam
       By: WaltWhite Date: January 18, 2026, 10:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=4018.msg106392#msg106392
       date=1768752105]
       Redbridge have now cancelled the PCN as a "gesture of goodwill".
       [/quote]
       Thanks very much to [member=1]cp8759[/member] for his work here.
       He is indeed a wizard of the first order!
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page