DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 64737--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> Did they send you a notice to owner? What is this latest
letter in response to?
>
--- End Quote ---
Sorry yes, this is the reply to the appeal I made when I
received the Notice to Owner!
#Post#: 64739--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't you come back here first?
What did you send?
Have they refoffered the discount?
The next step if you don't want to pay is to register an appeal
with London Tribunals. Opt for a personal/telephone/video
hearing.
You don't have to upload any evidence to start with.
#Post#: 64740--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi Stamfordman
I replied to the Notice to Owner with what had been said on her
previously. Sorry, I took heed of the advice earlier in this
thread to not clog up too much of this board with the ins and
outs. Is there something different I should have done at that
stage then?
I'm happy to go to tribunal, just not sure how to word it if
that letter was their response. I presumed that someone
different would read my latest appeal have have the foresight to
see that it isn't legal to give me a ticket for the reason they
gave, but it reads as if it's been the same person each time?
#Post#: 64741--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
4 pages in the foothills and then the enforcement process was
given to you as a link and you were asked to wait for the NTO
before posting again.
Then radio silence until your last post.
Post the full Notice of Rejection and NTO.
#Post#: 64742--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> 4 pages in the foothills and then the enforcement process was
given to you as a link and you were asked to wait for the NTO
before posting again.
>
> Then radio silence until your last post.
>
> Post the full Notice of Rejection and NTO.
>
--- End Quote ---
OK, a little harsh as this clearly isn't my day job and the last
thing I wanted to do was upset anyone, but here's the NTO.
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 64744--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: March 29, 2025, 7:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As you have received a NOR then you have limited time in which
to act to register an appeal if this is your preferred option.
Sorry, but we need to see all sides of the NTO and NOR. A
significant proportion of successful appeals is attributable to
procedural improprieties arising from NORs and to a lesser
degree NTOs which have nothing to do with the contravention
itself. That's just the way things are.
And you won't find better scrutineers of these docs than here.
#Post#: 64748--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 8:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Andersen, and from what I've seen I agree that the
scrutineering here is first class. Coming from an industry which
does not, I appreciate that this is not the type of work I am
used to.
Spoiler: I work for a council. Just not in the same department!
Here they are...
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 64755--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 9:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
My files seem to be too large so I'll post the full appeal
here...
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 64758--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: March 29, 2025, 9:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please read the READ ME FIRST instructions at the top of the
first page of the forum. For example:
3. Post the PCN and all subsequent notices or correspondence.
The easiest way is to take pictures with your phone. There is no
upload space on this site so you will have to upload to a
picture hosting site (such as
HTML https://imgur.com
or similar) and
post links
You can use the "add image" icon to embed images in your post:
Pl post the full NOR, all we've seen is the first page. There's
already an arguable procedural impropriety in the NTO* which
means that they're capable of c**k-ups, let's see if they've
done similar in the NOR.
As the NOR is dated Thurs 27 March then you have until 27 April
to register an appeal.
*- page 2, last para! '28 days beginning with the date of this
notice..'. Nope. Beginning on date of service. Although the
correct reference is stated on page 1, how are you supposed to
know which is correct?
28 days beginning on 6 March ....ends on 2 April. Whereas ..
28 days beginning on date of service...ends on 6 April.
4 days is a hell of a difference.
#Post#: 64761--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley - PCN is this Not Parking Correctly within the
markings of the bay?
DIR By: FuzzedRinggit
Date: March 29, 2025, 10:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
All images...
HTML https://imgur.com/a/EDvVneO
Apologies if I'm missing anything, I will try and put it right.
All help much appreciated.
FR
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 7
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page