DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 119988--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: Saj_87
Date: May 29, 2026, 6:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> So to recap, you didn't get a notice to owner?
>
> If so you can now file the witness statement saying you didn't
get it.
>
> You can do it with this online TE9 form and email it to TEC.
>
>
HTML https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf
>
--- End Quote ---
Thank you all,
Ive filled out the TE9 form and emailed it over and have
received an automatic reply.
#Post#: 123941--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: Saj_87
Date: July 7, 2026, 2:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Morning Folks,
Just a quick update, Finally received the Notice To Owner which
states to either pay the full charge at £110 or to make
representation.
Next steps would be to select "The alleged contravention did not
occur"
in the details section, is there anything specific which I
should state?
Kind regards
S
#Post#: 123948--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: tincombe
Date: July 7, 2026, 4:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Finally received the Notice To Owner..
..but when??
Post the NTO first and re-post the Charge Cert. Leave in dates
etc. You need to be prompt in these matters.
#Post#: 123981--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: Saj_87
Date: July 7, 2026, 9:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: tincombe link ---
>
> Finally received the Notice To Owner..
>
> ..but when??
>
> Post the NTO first and re-post the Charge Cert. Leave in dates
etc. You need to be prompt in these matters.
>
--- End Quote ---
Good afternoon,
Please see the images below
Latest NTO received on the 29th June 2026
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/620kGYkQ/NTO.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/620kGYkQ
Charge Cert received on 18th March 2025
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/G8QWsqWt/Charge-cert.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/G8QWsqWt
This was my challenge on 12th November 2024
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/DJg9bB9F/Challenge.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/DJg9bB9F
Hope this helps
#Post#: 124001--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: tincombe
Date: July 7, 2026, 12:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
NTO states....
'The penalty charge must be paid not later than the last day of
the period of 28 days beginning with the date of this Notice to
Owner'(their emphasis).
However, the regs provide that a NTO must state:
f)that the penalty charge, if not already paid, must be paid
within “the payment period” as defined by regulation 3(2)(a) of
the 2022 Appeals Regulations, that is the period of 28 days
beginning with the date on which the notice is served,
Why they've made this blunder, I don't know. But IMO it should
be fatal at adjudication should matters get that far.
IMO, your grounds should be 'contravention did not occur' and
'procedural impropriety'.
I'd be tempted to start with the PIs because they've already
rejected your substantive grounds on their own. Maybe the PIs
would give them reason to revisit this. Either way it's the
CEO's error or the authority's which should be enough for you,
maybe they'll throw the CEO under the proverbial bus, who knows?
Or bluster their way to adjudication?
You have until 28 July to make reps.
Is this the timeline of key events?
PCN issued 12 Nov. 2024
Original CC issued 18 March 2025 which claimed that a NTO had
been issued on 12 Nov. 2024 and gave 14 days in which to pay or
risk the next stage of enforcement;
Next stage of enforcement(an Order for Recovery) issued approx.
385 days later (mid-May 2026).
Is this correct?
#Post#: 124011--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: July 7, 2026, 2:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
There was no contravention and should Havering be stupid enough
to reject the adjudicator will probably allow the appeal anyway
on delay if unexplained.
#Post#: 124021--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN Havering Borough - Code 27, Parked in a special
enforcement area adjacent to drop kerb - Grenfell Ave
DIR By: Saj_87
Date: July 7, 2026, 4:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: tincombe link ---
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> NTO states....
>
> 'The penalty charge must be paid not later than the last day
of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of this Notice
to Owner'(their emphasis).
>
> However, the regs provide that a NTO must state:
>
> f)that the penalty charge, if not already paid, must be paid
within “the payment period” as defined by regulation 3(2)(a) of
the 2022 Appeals Regulations, that is the period of 28 days
beginning with the date on which the notice is served,
>
> Why they've made this blunder, I don't know. But IMO it should
be fatal at adjudication should matters get that far.
>
> IMO, your grounds should be 'contravention did not occur' and
'procedural impropriety'.
>
> I'd be tempted to start with the PIs because they've already
rejected your substantive grounds on their own. Maybe the PIs
would give them reason to revisit this. Either way it's the
CEO's error or the authority's which should be enough for you,
maybe they'll throw the CEO under the proverbial bus, who knows?
Or bluster their way to adjudication?
>
> You have until 28 July to make reps.
>
> Is this the timeline of key events?
>
> PCN issued 12 Nov. 2024
> Original CC issued 18 March 2025 which claimed that a NTO had
been issued on 12 Nov. 2024 and gave 14 days in which to pay or
risk the next stage of enforcement;
>
> Next stage of enforcement(an Order for Recovery) issued
approx. 385 days later (mid-May 2026).
>
> Is this correct?
>
--- End Quote ---
Good evening, thank you for your prompt response.
Yes that is precisely the time line of what has happened so far.
Once the order for recovery had started, filled out the TE3 and
TE9 forms. Then recived the NTO in June 2026.
I'll fill in the form and stated the the 'contravention did not
occur'
Shall I give them a writen explanation with the appeal?
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 5
DIR Previous Page