URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3218--------------------------------------------------
       Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: troolykool
       Date: August 14, 2023, 6:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       PCN served by TFL
       Contravention  62: Parked with one or more wheels on or over a
       footpath or any part of a road other than a carriageway
       Location: West Cromwell Road (Kensington & Chelsea)
       PCN Number: GF83563781.
       REG: LB22 TFV.
       GSV:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/7eYmq4wJGmgbcLBT8?g_st=iw
       
       Help!
       I was unloading and loading outside my husband’s flat for less
       than two minutes and the photograph shows the delivery man I was
       loading / unloading from. While the car appears to be on a
       footpath, there is still a clear a slip road allowing vehicles
       to enter and park inside the area mapped out by the small posts,
       as shown in the image and there are other vehicles also parked
       near mine (as shown in one of the images).
       Regardless of this, I still moved the vehicle as soon as I spoke
       to the civil enforcement officer who told me it was not
       permitted (as shown in the two photos one with the car there,
       and one with it not there), to avoid complications. I have since
       received the PCN, which has been served by post.  Please help me
       with suggested wording and reasoning for how to make a
       representation against the penalty charge. I feel it is
       confusing to have a slip road if cars are not permitted to drive
       on to it. I have unloaded in this spot many times before without
       any problems, and regularly see cars stopping here.
       Thank you so much!
       Image links to of all sides of the PCN:
  HTML https://ibb.co/cCsLYgv
  HTML https://ibb.co/yRb2hTh
  HTML https://ibb.co/c2Zs47d
  HTML https://ibb.co/GRfSxNW
  HTML https://ibb.co/zhStmMg
  HTML https://ibb.co/Bs3t3ch
       #Post#: 3237--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: Chaseman
       Date: August 14, 2023, 12:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1974 at s.15
       bans pavement parking as a general matter throughout Greater
       London. The same is not true elsewhere in the country. However,
       there is an exemption for loading/unloading and you will see
       this as a ground for appeal on the PCN. However, in order to
       take advantage of this exemption you have to meet the following
       tests:
       d)for the purpose of loading or unloading goods [F6for a period
       not exceeding 20 minutes or such longer period as the council
       may permit], and—
       (i)the loading or unloading of the vehicle could not have been
       satisfactorily performed if it had not been so parked; and
       (ii)the vehicle was not left unattended at any time while it was
       so parked.
       So you say the unloading was for only two minutes so you should
       be able to satisfy d) but were these goods sufficiently bulky or
       heavy or awkward that you could not have satisfactorily unloaded
       without parking on the pavement? AND was the car not left
       unattended at ANY time while parked?
       What do you mean by a "delivery man you were unloading from"?
       You will usually unload from a vehicle. Was this man assisting
       you? Do you have any documentary evidence of the unloading e.g.
       an invoice or Goods Received Note?
       It seems the CEO was wrong if he said you could not park on the
       pavement AT ALL to unload but the onus is on you to satisfy the
       Council that your conduct satisfied the exemption above. You
       refer to photograph[s] presumably of the unloading activity
       taking place, but I can't see them in your post. Whose photos
       are they?
       #Post#: 3240--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: troolykool
       Date: August 14, 2023, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you. In answers to your questions:
       I was unloading from my vehicle (a scooter, building tools,
       flooring) but I was also planning to load a TV into my vehicle
       that had just been delivered to me. I have a delivery confirmed
       receipt for the TV.  (Note- I did not have a chance to load the
       TV into the car or take the other items into the flat - I had to
       leave everything on the steps outside my property because the
       officer approached me part way through the process saying he was
       going give me a PCN.)
       I immediately moved the car to the next available side road that
       allows Pay and Display (which isn't close enough to be able to
       carry heavy goods from) and parked there, and went back for the
       TV and other items by foot.
       I was at the car the entire time so it was never left unattended
       and the incident was less than two minutes - as you can see on
       the PCN, the timings stated are 12:48-12:48!
       There is literally nowhere else to unload or load as the
       property is located on a dual carriage way and the closest road
       around the corner is for permit resident holders only.
       Any help with the wording / template for the appeal would be
       greatly appreciated.
       #Post#: 3250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: August 14, 2023, 4:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > the photograph shows the delivery man I was loading /
       unloading from.
       --- End Quote ---
       There is no photograph posted, only the PCN pages.
       As pointed out by Chaseman, there is an exemption for loading
       activities when parked off-carriagway, but the vehicle must be
       attended the whole time.
       Could you also expand on the use of the area bounded by posts
       which appears to have an access from the carriageway. I see no
       sign that might permit parking there. Certainly I would mention
       it in any reps you submit, plus of course, claiming the loading
       exemption. You need to prepare a list of items with bulk and
       weight estimated, or even detailed parameters.
       #Post#: 3255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: troolykool
       Date: August 14, 2023, 5:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks.
       The photographs are taken by TfL and are on their website when
       you enter the PCN number. For ease, I’ve pasted links to them
       below. You’ll see the white van in one pic - that is the van
       dropping off the TV. In the other pic,  you’ll see the delivery
       man with the TV if you zoom in.
  HTML https://ibb.co/CK6x7Yg
  HTML https://ibb.co/3fw664V
       I don’t know what the area with the bollards is for if not
       loading and unloading. It’s clearly a slip road from the dual
       carriageway allowing cars to drive on it and there are no signs
       anywhere suggesting you cannot enter this area.
       To confirm, the vehicle was attended the whole time as shown in
       the photos.
       Would you be able to advise the types of heavy goods I would
       need to list?
       Thanks again
       #Post#: 3257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: August 14, 2023, 5:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It might be better to take photos of the goods.
       --- Quote ---
       > a scooter, building tools, flooring) but I was also planning
       to load a TV into my vehicle that had just been delivered to me
       --- End Quote ---
       Plenty of awkward and reasonably bulky/heavy stuff, I'd say.
       However, the main point to make is - are you prepared for a
       rejection, because if so, you either have to cough-up, or take
       them to London Tribunals, and this means the discount option is
       lost.
       You could also ask the council, (not TfL), under FOI what is the
       purpose of the area bounded by bollards that is provided with
       access from the carriageway. It is the council that have
       installed this, not TfL.
       #Post#: 3273--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: guest179
       Date: August 15, 2023, 5:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don’t know what the area with the bollards is for if not
       loading and unloading. It’s clearly a slip road from the dual
       carriageway allowing cars to drive on it and there are no signs
       anywhere suggesting you cannot enter this area.
       It is a footway. There is a dropped footway without an apparent
       purpose because it's built to pedestrian specs and standards,
       not vehicle, but doesn't have a corresponding 'mate' at the
       central reservation.
       But this doesn't make where you were a carriageway..just look at
       the surface treatment, they're flag stones exactly the same as
       before and after the bollards. Your misunderstanding on this
       point might be genuine, but I doubt it would cut much ice with
       TfL.
       What I don't understand and I think you should mention in reps
       is why, if you had just opened your boot and not left the
       vehicle, the CEO did not just inform you and ask you to move. I
       want to focus on why they served a postal PCN.
       If they had started to prepare a PCN to be given by hand why
       tell you to move and then serve by post? IMO, if you moved at
       the CEO's request then they have no grounds on which to serve a
       postal PCN.
       #Post#: 3274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: troolykool
       Date: August 15, 2023, 6:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Does it matter whether it is a footpath or not if I can prove I
       was loading/unloading, the vehicle was never left unattended and
       it was only for a minute?
       Would anyone be able to suggest a template email for the
       representation on this basis?
       Thank you in advance
       #Post#: 3277--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: troolykool
       Date: August 15, 2023, 7:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Which of the following do I tick for the loading exemption?
       Representation details
       The Contravention did not Occur
       The Traffic Order was invalid
       I was not the owner/keeper at the time of the Contravention
       The Vehicle has been taken without my consent
       The Penalty has been paid in full, or has been paid at the
       reduced amount within the specified period
       The Penalty Charge exceeds the applicable amount
       We are a Hire Firm and have supplied the name of the hirer
       There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the
       Enforcement Authority
       Any mitigating circumstances you wish to raise
       #Post#: 3279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kensington & Chelsea - contravention 62: Parked on
       'footpath', served by TFL - Pls help!
   DIR By: guest179
       Date: August 15, 2023, 7:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Does it matter whether it is a footpath or not if I can prove I
       was loading/unloading, the vehicle was never left unattended and
       it was only for a minute?
       Yes. The exemption is:
       d)for the purpose of loading or unloading goods [F6for a period
       not exceeding 20 minutes or such longer period as the council
       may permit], and—
       (i)the loading or unloading of the vehicle could not have been
       satisfactorily performed if it had not been so parked; and
       (ii)the vehicle was not left unattended at any time while it was
       so parked.
       My emphasis. Not just because it is convenient but because it
       could not satisfactorily etc......
       As regards your grounds, I don't know because you've avoided the
       issue of the interaction between you and the CEO which is
       important. If a postal PCN should not have been issued then
       'procedural impropriety' comes into play in addition to
       contravention did not occur.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 5
   DIR Next Page