URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 45683--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: seanjean123
       Date: November 15, 2024, 2:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > [quote]author=Incandescent
       link=topic=3829.msg45666#msg4[i]5666 date=1731626288]
       > Sorry, but surely the previous photos show a "No parking on
       verges" sign right at the front of your car ?
       > I thought the argument was that your parking was on the
       hardstanding, and the photos would seem to support this. [/i]
       --- End Quote ---
       [img width=877.5
       height=618]
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/V0eWDiI.jpeg[/img]
       [img width=877.5
       height=1955]
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/GRHVvfi.jpeg[/img]
       I'd still go with my draft suggestion in post Reply#14
       [/quote]
       OK see what you are saying. There are two signs. But will go
       with the earlier draft suggestion thanks
       #Post#: 45684--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: November 15, 2024, 2:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post yr draft here for comment before sending.
       #Post#: 45798--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carria
   DIR By: seanjean123
       Date: November 15, 2024, 6:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       planning to go with something like this. please provide
       feedback. I plan to submit  tomorrow. Thanks
       I am writing to formally challenge the Penalty Charge Notice for
       the alleged contravention of “parking with one or more
       wheels on any part of an urban road other than a
       carriageway.”
       I believe the PCN was issued incorrectly for the following
       reasons:
       Vehicle Position:
       The council's photographic evidence clearly shows that my
       vehicle was parked entirely on the tarmac hardstanding of the
       Swan Hotel's car park and not on the verge. While there may have
       been a minor overhang of the bumper or one wheel, this is
       negligible and falls under the legal principle of “de
       minimis.” As such, the contravention alleged did not
       occur.
       Signage and Ambiguity:
       The "No Parking on Verge" sign visible in the photos is
       positioned in such a way that it applies to the area behind the
       sign (i.e., further onto the grass verge). My vehicle was parked
       on the hardstanding in front of the sign, making the restriction
       ambiguous at best.
       Incorrect Contravention Code:
       The contravention code cited in the PCN is incorrect. If there
       were a valid reason to enforce a penalty, the correct code
       should have been for parking on a footpath or private road, as
       detailed in Annex B of the Secretary of State’s Statutory
       Guidance. The use of an incorrect code invalidates this PCN.
       Private Property:
       My vehicle was parked on private land owned by the Swan Hotel or
       its parking operator, as indicated by the signage at the car
       park entrance. The council does not have jurisdiction to issue
       PCNs on this land without a clear and applicable Traffic
       Regulation Order (TRO), which I believe does not exist in this
       case.
       For these reasons, I respectfully request that the PCN be
       canceled.
       I look forward to your response and am confident this matter can
       be resolved promptly.
       #Post#: 45832--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: baroudeur
       Date: November 16, 2024, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The grass areas are council property, impose the boundary of the
       car park block paved area, and  the 'No Parking' signs relate to
       those areas.
       This is a case of de minimus and council enforcement at its
       worst.  But, that's Bedford's modus operandi unfortunately.
       #Post#: 45835--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: seanjean123
       Date: November 16, 2024, 10:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please can someone have a look at my reply and see if this is
       ok.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 45836--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: November 16, 2024, 10:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'd just change 'formally challenge' to 'challenge' (the
       'formal' stage is yet to come, see the enforcement process:
  HTML https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat/understanding-enforcement-process/parking-penalty-charge-notice-enforcement-process)<br
       />then IMO you're good to go. If they reject, then at least we
       should see their reasoning.
       #Post#: 45839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: November 16, 2024, 11:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I can't see any need for anything more than 'The contravention
       did not occur - the council's photographic evidence clearly
       shows that my vehicle was parked entirely on the tarmac
       hardstanding of the Swan Hotel's car park and not on the verge.'
       But you may as well throw in the kitchen sinks.
       #Post#: 45873--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: November 17, 2024, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, the wrong contravention should be put to them as well.
       'Urban road' went out with the Ark.
       #Post#: 51174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: seanjean123
       Date: December 28, 2024, 6:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       I responded on the website to the charge and challeneged it. I
       did not receive anything back until today. I received a letter
       from the post saying i should pay GBP 70 as i did not pay the
       GBP35. I did not even receive anything about my challenge if it
       was successful or not. Please how should i proceed
       #Post#: 51184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Bedford, Code 62 Parked with one or more wheels on any part
       of an urban road other than a carriage way, Embankment
   DIR By: mdann52
       Date: December 28, 2024, 7:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have you checked the address on your V5C is correct and up to
       date?
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 7
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page