URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 46867--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: pred02
       Date: November 24, 2024, 3:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I received the attached rejection by the council. What is the
       next step in the appeal process? Do I have to make an appeal in
       person? I am weighting the effort versus paying double jeopardy
       for the fine.
       Thanks,
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 46871--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 24, 2024, 3:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, it's up to you, but they have sent you their usual Fob-Off
       letter that does not address in any way the points made in your
       reps. Pay up if you want, but if it were me, I'd be waiting for
       the Notice to Owner, and submitting formal reps, and if again
       rejected, take them to London Tribunals.  If councils decide to
       suspend parking they have a duty to sign it adequately. They
       failed to do so.
       #Post#: 46877--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: pred02
       Date: November 24, 2024, 4:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Well, it's up to you, but they have sent you their usual
       Fob-Off letter that does not address in any way the points made
       in your reps. Pay up if you want, but if it were me, I'd be
       waiting for the Notice to Owner, and submitting formal reps, and
       if again rejected, take them to London Tribunals.  If councils
       decide to suspend parking they have a duty to sign it
       adequately. They failed to do so.
       --- End Quote ---
       I will challenge the ticket. So there is no action for me until
       I get the Notice to Owner? Then I can submit the formal rep
       online, should I submit anything different that in the informal
       rep. Is the entire process online or via post or do I need to go
       in person?
       The reason I ask is that a few years back I took a big shipping
       company to small claims court. At the end, I was succesful but
       it was quite painful with different forms needing to be in by
       different times and then having to go to court versus a big shot
       law firm. Lots of stress!
       #Post#: 46878--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 24, 2024, 5:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > I will challenge the ticket. So there is no action for me
       until I get the Notice to Owner? Then I can submit the formal
       rep online, should I submit anything different that in the
       informal rep. Is the entire process online or via post or do I
       need to go in person?
       --- End Quote ---
       Firtly, are you the owner, and hold the V5 Registration
       Certificate for the vehicle ? The Notice to Owner is sent to the
       name and address on the V5. Is this name and address correct and
       up-to-date ?
       Your informal reps will need to be beefed-up a bit to be formal
       reps, but not by too much. The NtO process is that they send you
       it in the post, and you can normally respond on-line.  This may
       be where it gets more interesting as some council seem to have
       totally cocked-up there on-line pages for submitting
       representations, but we won't know until we see the NtO.
       If you get to London Tribunals, you can register an appeal on
       line, and select a hearing or an adjudication on the papers by
       an adjudicator. Do NOT select the latter, it is of paramount
       importance that you be present. However, no need to trek up to
       their offices, as most appeals are done over the phone nowadays.
       The councils almost never turn up, BTW. Some contributors here
       may offer to represent you on a pro bono basis, as they like to
       see the councils squirm.
       #Post#: 48913--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: pred02
       Date: December 8, 2024, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have now received the Notice to Owner. I need to fill out a
       form for making representation. I need to fill out Grounds for
       representation, give evidence of detail and submit supporting
       evidence.
       1. What representation should I select?
       - The alleged contravention did not occur
       - the traffic order which is alleged to have contravened is
       invalid
       - there has been a procedural impropriety on the part of
       enforcement authority
       2. In Section 3, what detail of representation should I include
       above amd beyond the informal statement I included above?
       3. What additional evidence should I include - e.g photographs
       of signs near the parked car with no notice on them?
       Thanks
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 48919--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: December 8, 2024, 2:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: pred02 link ---
       >
       > I have now received the Notice to Owner. I need to fill out a
       form for making representation. I need to fill out Grounds for
       representation, give evidence of detail and submit supporting
       evidence.
       >
       > 1. What representation should I select?
       > - The alleged contravention did not occur
       > - the traffic order which is alleged to have contravened is
       invalid
       > - there has been a procedural impropriety on the part of
       enforcement authority
       >
       > 2. In Section 3, what detail of representation should I
       include above amd beyond the informal statement I included
       above?
       >
       > 3. What additional evidence should I include - e.g photographs
       of signs near the parked car with no notice on them?
       >
       > Thanks
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       For 1, select
       "alleged contravention did no occur"
       and
       "there has been a procedural impropriety...etc"
       (you are not restricted to a single statutory ground)
       For 2
       You informal reps, plus "the council in their response to my
       informal challenge have totally ignored the points made in that
       challenge, thus committing a procedural impropriety of failure
       to consider, one of their statutory duties within the relevant
       regulations.
       For 3
       Photographs essential
       Others may suggest additional items.
       #Post#: 48922--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: pred02
       Date: December 8, 2024, 2:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks. I see I can make representation online. Happy to send
       informal representation plus paragraph above as well as photos
       taken the night off showing no signage at 65 and 75. Anything to
       add before I submit?
       #Post#: 48929--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: December 8, 2024, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: pred02 link ---
       >
       > Thanks. I see I can make representation online. Happy to send
       informal representation plus paragraph above as well as photos
       taken the night off showing no signage at 65 and 75. Anything to
       add before I submit?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Post your proposed text for a review, if you want.
       #Post#: 48943--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: pred02
       Date: December 9, 2024, 1:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > [quote author=pred02 link=topic=3670.msg48922#msg48922
       date=1733691493]
       > Thanks. I see I can make representation online. Happy to send
       informal representation plus paragraph above as well as photos
       taken the night off showing no signage at 65 and 75. Anything to
       add before I submit?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Post your proposed text for a review, if you want.
       [/quote]
       I reside in Lambeth and have a resident permit with permission
       to park on Bavent Road.
       On the day in question, I arrived at my house on Bavent Road,
       parked and went to my house at 68 Bavent Road. Neither of the
       parking bay signs near my car, which are located at 65 or 75,
       had any temporary suspension sign attached to them.  A motorist
       is entitled to take the parking conditions on the bay sign
       nearest to his car on the side where parked as valid.
       In view of the failure of the council adequately to sign the
       suspension, I request that the PCN be cancelled.
       The council in their response to my informal challenge have
       totally ignored the points made in that challenge, thus
       committing a procedural impropriety of failure to consider, one
       of their statutory duties within the relevant regulations.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 49063--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth: Parking in Temporarily Suspended Bay Bavent Road
       Code 21
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: December 9, 2024, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I live at 68 Bavent Road and hold a residents permit.
       The properties in the road are numbered sequentially albeit on
       opposite sides i.e. my side runs from 55A to 82(55,56,57..etc)
       while that opposite runs from 1-54.
       On my side there is a parking place which extends from no.61 to
       no.84. Within this the council have placed 3 traffic signs
       pursuant to their duty to place  such traffic signs in such
       positions as the order making authority may consider requisite
       for securing that adequate information as to the effect of the
       order is made available to persons using the road;
       These are situated o/s nos. 61,65 and 75.
       On the day in question, I parked o/s no.68, took a glance at the
       nearest traffic sign and went to my house. When I returned to my
       car I noticed the PCN. I looked around and finally found a
       single suspension sign placed o/s no.61. This meant that despite
       the suspended area falling between nos. 64 and 74 and there
       being 2 traffic signs within or in the vicinity of this area the
       council decided to place a single suspension sign outside the
       suspended area.
       I refer you to the council's regulatory duty above which, as you
       should know, continues with 'c)in a case where the order
       revokes, amends or alters the application of a previous order,
       the removal or replacement of existing traffic signs as the
       authority considers requisite to avoid confusion to road users
       by signs being left in the wrong positions.
       A suspension 'amends' the application of the traffic order and
       yet despite this the council have adopted a lower standard of
       signing - one which I assert is not open to them and unlawful-
       by placing only a single sign which was not within or in the
       vicinity of the area to be suspended.
       The responsibility of a motorist is to refer to the nearest
       applicable traffic sign(in my case o/s no.65) which I did, and
       not to 'traipse the streets' to use a phrase adopted by
       adjudicators looking for another which in any event in this case
       would simply have revealed an unamended traffic sign o/s no.75.
       The council have failed to meet their regulatory duty under
       regulation 18 of the Local Authorities' Traffic Order etc.
       Regulations and consequently have no lawful authority to demand
       a penalty which must be cancelled.
       My views on a longer version.
       OP, are the specific details correct?
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page