URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 79264--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: PCN ticket
       Date: July 2, 2025, 11:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post up a copy of the completed Witness Statement form
       that you submitted to the TEC.
       (This is already attached at the top but will to it again)
       The Adjudicator has stated that the WS was submitted on the
       ground that you submitted an appeal to the Adjudicator and had
       no response? The Adjudicator says no such appeal was received.
       Is that what happened?
       (No I have not submitted any to the tribunal only the first one
       to TEC)
       Did TFL write to you when you asked for a refund? If so, please
       post that up. Likewise when they referred the matter to the
       Adjudicator did they write to you?
       (Yes to both , I attached it hear)
       The only option I can see is for you to request a review of the
       adjudicator's direction. These are difficult to get and need to
       be submitted on time.
       PS
       The revoking order from the TEC dated 8th October 2024 is
       missing from the status history on the TFL website.
       Exactly how many Witness Statements and/or Statutory
       Declarations did you submit to the TEC?
       (The statutory declarations was done by TEC themselves when I
       phoned them asked if they received the court order, 2 WS was
       done, 1 was by someone who competed it wrong and then one done
       again to court the N442 form)
       And when? Will post again
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 79301--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 2, 2025, 1:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, I think you're going off piste.
       The adjudicator's directions HAVE NO EFFECT as regards the court
       direction: the OfR is revoked and the CC is to be cancelled.
       'The tribunal cannot look behind the decision of the court'.
       In conjunction, you are directed to pay the PCN - which of
       course is b****y nonsense because it's already been paid!
       So, your liability now is £0
       IMO, forget the tribunal and focus your attention on TfL.
       
       I have received the directions of the adjudicator and will abide
       by them. I therefore expect TfL to now act upon the decision of
       the Traffic Enforcement Centre i.e. to cancel the Charge
       Certificate (the Order for Recovery having already been
       revoked).
       On *** I paid £*** to *** comprising ********. The adjudicator's
       directions relate only to the penalty charge and therefore all
       other sums paid to TfL must be refunded.
       Therefore, within the next 14 days the sum of £***** in respect
       of the following must be refunded:
       £*** enforcement agent's fees;
       £*** court registration fee;
       £*** surcharged penalty.
       My account details are as follows.......
       #Post#: 79591--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: Enceladus
       Date: July 4, 2025, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It seems that on the Witness Statement, which you haven't shown
       us, that was the subject of the N244 application you ticked the
       box that said "I appealed against the local authority’s decision
       to reject my representation, within 28 days of service of the
       rejection notice, but have had no response to my appeal."
       The term appeal, as used here, means an appeal to the
       independent adjudicator at the London Tribunals. TFL referred
       the case to the Adjudicator who decided that no such appeal had
       been submitted. You were then ordered to pay the full penalty
       charge amount of £160. So no discount available.
       You should have ticked the box on the Witness Statement form
       that said "I did not receive the Notice to Owner / Penalty
       Charge Notice." Doing so would have resulted in TFL having to
       re-serve the (postal) PCN. This you could have challenged or
       paid at the discount rate, so £80.
       The Witness Statement form should really be clearer, but that's
       what we have to live with.
       When you write to TFL asking them to refund the fees please make
       sure that you ask for all the bailiff fees as well as any TFL
       fees and charges beyond the £160 ordered by the Adjudicator. You
       could ask for the £275 N244 application fee as well, but I very
       much doubt if TFL will agree to refund it.
       £75  = Bailiff (enforcement agent) Compliance Stage Fee = Notice
       of Enforcement
       £235 = Bailiff Enforcement Stage Fee = Bailiff Visit
       £110 = Bailiff Sale Stage Fee
       £420 = Total bailiff charges
       £80  = Charge Certificate 50% surcharge
       £9  = TEC registration fee
       £89 = Total TFL charges
       #Post#: 79601--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 4, 2025, 10:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wouldn't push it! TfL are obliged(I think Enceladus was being
       polite when he referred to 'ask') to refund all bailiff fees
       paid, the TEC registration fee and the amount of the penalty
       surcharge. He's separated these into their amounts so I'd get on
       with it.
       IMO, nobody at this point needs to look behind TEC's decision
       and I wouldn't let any communication get near it.
       #Post#: 79607--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: PCN ticket
       Date: July 4, 2025, 12:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I did request for full refund on 29/01/25 but not received
       anything instead they sent it to tribunal
       Please see the letter I sent and the response I received and
       advise.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 79610--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: July 4, 2025, 12:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PCN ticket link ---
       >
       > I did request for full refund on 29/01/25 but not received
       anything instead they sent it to tribunal
       > Please see the letter I sent and the response I received and
       advise.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There are no dates on these communications?
       Is this yr letter of 29/1/25?
       What is the date of their response?
       #Post#: 79614--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 4, 2025, 12:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You wouldn't get a 'full refund' if your TEC grounds were 'made
       reps but did ot receive response'. As TEC's revoking orders make
       clear, 'this does not cancel the PCN'.
       Will you please just get back on track. By virtue of the
       adjudicator's decision you are due the refund whose components
       Enceladus has set out.
       Get on with it.
       Sorry to be blunt, but this is a out now in the context of the
       adjudicator's decision.
       #Post#: 79637--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: Mut
       Date: July 5, 2025, 2:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       PCN Ticket, your position is now quite straightforward. The TEC
       order from 08 October revoked the Order for Recovery and
       cancelled the Charge Certificate. That means TfL should not have
       retained any enforcement fees or surcharges. The £420 paid to
       the bailiffs, the £80 surcharge, and the £9 TEC fee, totalling
       £509, are all recoverable.
       You have paid the £160 PCN following the tribunal’s decision, so
       that part is done. The tribunal does not override the TEC order
       and cannot authorise TfL to keep sums beyond the PCN itself.
       That is now settled.
       Your next step is to write to TfL, refer to the TEC order, and
       request a refund of £509 within 14 days. If they do not respond
       or refuse, you are entitled to bring a money claim in the county
       court for restitution of the unlawfully retained charges. You
       may also raise a complaint through their complaints process and
       escalate to the Local Government Ombudsman if needed, but the
       small claim is the most direct and effective route.
       You are in a strong position. Best to now act on it.
       #Post#: 79650--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: PCN ticket
       Date: July 5, 2025, 4:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I sent this on their website on 29/0/25 and they replied on
       07/05/25
       Please see the witness statement which was sent to TEC and the
       person who filled it in for me tick the wrong box.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 79674--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Red route ticket issued by post to old address 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 5, 2025, 6:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry, but who cares?
       The court has decided and the adjudicator has confirmed that it
       does lie with him to look behind the revocation order. Neither
       can TfL and neither should you.
       Where you are now starts with the adjudicator's decision as I
       put in my draft.
       Get on with it.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page