URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 70661--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: May 9, 2025, 6:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A money claim was received today from DCB Legal / UK Parking
       Control. Do I need to post this up here? What is the next course
       of action please?
       #Post#: 70667--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 9, 2025, 6:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just post the actual Claim Form with the Particulars of Claim
       (PoC). Only redact your personal data, the claim number and the
       MCOL password. Leave everything else visible, especially all
       dates.
       #Post#: 70670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: May 9, 2025, 6:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/zTmQPkpR/Whats-App-Image-2025-05-09-at-12-15-39-71c59c2a.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/zTmQPkpR
       #Post#: 70675--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 9, 2025, 7:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With an issue date of 7th May, you have until 4pm on Tuesday
       27th May to submit your defence. If you submit an
       Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then
       have until 4pm on Monday 9th June to submit your defence.
       If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in
       this linked PDF:
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0
       Otherwise, here is the defence and link to the draft order that
       goes with it. You only need to edit your name and the claim
       number. You sign the defence by typing your full name for the
       signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the draft
       order.
       When you're ready you combine both documents as a single PDF
       attachment and send as an attachment in an email to
       claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim
       number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the
       email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft
       order in the matter of UK Parking Control Ltd v [your full name]
       Claim no.: [claim number]."
       --- Quote ---
       > [center]IN THE COUNTY COURT[/center]
       > [right]Claim No: [Claim Number][/right]
       >
       > [center]BETWEEN:
       >
       > UK Parking Control Ltd
       > Claimant
       >
       > - and -
       >
       > [Defendant's Full Name]
       > 
Defendant
       >
       >
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >
       > DEFENCE[/center]
       >
       > 1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The
       Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and
       that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not
       adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.
       >
       > 2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of
       Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made
       against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR
       16.4.
       >
       > 3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC
       because:
       >
       > [indent](a) The contract referred to is not detailed or
       attached to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);
       >
       > (b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or
       clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or
       contracts) which is/are relied on;
       >
       > (c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons)
       why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract
       (or contracts)
       >
       > (d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity
       exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the
       breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was
       parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;
       >
       > (e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is
       calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest,
       damages, or other charges;
       >
       > (f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the
       parking charge and what proportion is damages;
       >
       > (g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is
       sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant
       cannot plead alternative causes of action without
       specificity.[/indent]
       >
       > 4. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft
       order approved by a district judge at another court. The court
       struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining
       that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR 16.4.
       The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:
       >
       > [indent](i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or
       clauses) of the terms and conditions relied upon;
       >
       > (ii) Adequately explain the reasons why the defendant was
       allegedly in breach of contract;
       >
       > (iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as
       permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).
       >
       > (iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum
       claimed, requiring further case management steps would be
       disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective.
       Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than
       permitting an amendment.[/indent]
       >
       > 5. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in
       this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by
       striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with
       CPR 16.4.
       >
       > Statement of truth
       >
       > I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I
       understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought
       against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false
       statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without
       an honest belief in its truth.
       >
       > Signed:
       >
       >
       > Date:
       --- End Quote ---
       Draft Order for the defence
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tcewefk7daozuje25chkl/Strikeout-order-v2.pdf?rlkey=wxnymo8mwcma2jj8xihjm7pdx&st=nbtf0cn6&dl=0
       #Post#: 70680--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: May 9, 2025, 7:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Many thanks.
       Maybe a daft question, but why does the draft order not have any
       case reference related to it? I am assuming it was made in
       relation to a specific case.
       #Post#: 70681--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: May 9, 2025, 7:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: oshkosh link ---
       >
       > I am assuming it was made in relation to a specific case.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You're hoping it'll be made in relation to your case. The draft
       is provided so that if the judge agrees with the proposal, he
       can just use that draft for this case.
       #Post#: 70682--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: May 9, 2025, 7:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got it ::) thanks
       #Post#: 71194--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: May 13, 2025, 4:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Docs sent by email. Do I need to serve to the Claimant as well,
       or is that done automatically by the Court?
       #Post#: 71213--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 13, 2025, 5:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No. The CNBC will send a copy of your defence to the claimant.
       You will receive an acknowledgement that this has been done.
       #Post#: 80591--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Brent Cross Shopping Centre DYL - UKPC
   DIR By: oshkosh
       Date: July 11, 2025, 8:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Received form N180 today. Is this normal process?
       They wish to allocate to Small Track.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page