DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 41996--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ulez Fine now CDER Bailiff
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: October 23, 2024, 7:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Pressman link ---
>
> A leaked article from the Civil Enforcement Agents
Association's newsletter to its bailiff company members,
re-shared on the Telegram app, revealed that bailiff companies
successfully recover only one-third of traffic debt cases
assigned to them.
>
--- End Quote ---
Which I would think is mostly London. Almost all the threads we
get on here are about London councils or TfL. There needs to be
serious reform of the system to stop councils just using PCNs as
a Magic Money Tree.
#Post#: 42110--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ulez Fine now CDER Bailiff
DIR By: regis
Date: October 23, 2024, 5:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Pressman link ---
>
> maripop00
>
> You may resolve this swiftly and decisively.
>
> Your mother should make a statutory declaration affirming that
she has no association with the debtor and is the sole owner of
the property, including any vehicles therein.
>
> Once the declaration is formally sworn, serve it upon TfL and
the bailiff company, ensuring you obtain a certificate of
posting for proof of service.
>
> This action will extricate your mother's address from the
enforcement proceedings, allowing you to disengage entirely.
>
> While others may delve into the minutiae of postal issues,
suggesting you pursue extensive correspondence with TfL and
compile timelines, such efforts will likely prove unproductive.
>
> This pragmatic approach focuses on an expeditious and
definitive solution that aligns with your objective. It is about
taking direct, impactful action to resolve matters swiftly and
effectively without unnecessary complications.
>
>
--- End Quote ---
---------------------------------------------------------
Why would maripop00 mother make a statutory declaration
affirming that she has no association with the debtor and is the
sole owner of the property, including any vehicles therein?
[/hr]
---------------------------------------------------------
A simple email to the enforcement agent company from maripop00
mother should suffice, usually proof of age / disability and a
council tax bill suffices proving she solely is resident at the
property in question.
That would appear to resolve the issue swiftly hassle free
[/hr]
---------------------------------------------------------
unless maripop00 wants it resolved differently. I can't
understand how a stat dec from maripop00 mother would be
accepted by TEC considering she's not the Respondent. Surely her
stat dec, in that case, would most likely be returned.
[/hr]
--- Quote from: maripop00 link ---
>
> Guys, thanks for all the discussion but I do feel like I am
being judged here more than being helped, which is what I was
recommened to come here for.
> By judged... but I was not given the opportunity to deal with
it.
>
--- End Quote ---
---------------------------------------------------------
You are going to get judge by people whose tireless inputs and
efforts are repeatedly and endlessly getting judged by local /
charging authorities, adjudicators, enforcement agents and so
on.
[/hr]
---------------------------------------------------------
Ultimately, if you can evidence, that you was not served PCN and
or NTO or reminder of PCN/NTO then this must be declared and
evidence provided and the court can order the PCN revert back to
the original PCN price.
If you can evidence, that you was not served, and within a
certain timeframe, the Order and Form (Order for Recovery and
Stat Dec/Witness Statement) that is a breach of the CPR Rules.
[/hr]
#Post#: 47336--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ulez Fine now CDER Bailiff
DIR By: maripop00
Date: November 27, 2024, 3:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Pressman link ---
>
> maripop00
>
> You may resolve this swiftly and decisively.
>
--- End Quote ---
I would like to say thank you to Pressman for your help, the
drafted letter on the first page of this topic has resulted in
the fine being cancelled altogether.
Thanks to everyone else for their input
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 47357--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ulez Fine now CDER Bailiff
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: November 27, 2024, 5:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Very well done indeed ! We don't see this very often.
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 5
DIR Previous Page