URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 41453--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Met Parking Services - Occupants left premises - Mc Donalds
       Leytonstone
   DIR By: S.M
       Date: October 19, 2024, 5:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > You can use the same points in the POPLA appeal. However,
       there is no such thing as the "registered hirer". There is only
       the "driver", "keeper" or "hirer". The "keeper" can be just the
       "keeper" or the "registered keeper".
       >
       > In this case, the person appealing is the day to day "keeper"
       but is not the named "keeper" which is where an issue could
       arise. The point about no evidence of the driver leaving the
       site is a powerful one but don't expect POPLA to really care.
       They can be moronic at times.
       >
       > Even if POPLA reject the appeal, there is no obligation to pay
       the charge and the POPLA decision has absolutely no bearing on
       any future proceedings. However, as pointed out, If POPLA reject
       the appeal, MET are going to send a reminder to Tusker where you
       will be screwed.
       >
       > It would be Tusker who receive the claim form in their name.
       If it were in the employees name, it would never reach a hearing
       because it is what is known as a "toothbrush" case where
       previous attempts by PPCs to claim driver left site cases that
       actually got in front of a judge, the advocate for the claimant
       was told in no uncertain terms that if they tried to waste the
       courts time on these pathetic, un-evidenced claims, they'd
       better bring a toothbrush next time because they would not be
       going home from the court for their unreasonable behaviour.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Let`s see if POPla accepts the appeal. Appeal submitted
       #Post#: 42950--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Met Parking Services - Occupants left premises - Mc Donalds
       Leytonstone
   DIR By: S.M
       Date: October 29, 2024, 12:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "The operator has contacted us and told us that they have
       withdrawn your appeal"
       Good News
       Thanks for the help [member=26]b789[/member]
       #Post#: 42984--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Met Parking Services - Occupants left premises - Mc Donalds
       Leytonstone
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: October 29, 2024, 2:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good result. Well done and thanks for updating us.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page