DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 53715--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: January 16, 2025, 1:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you [member=12]Incandescent[/member]!
How do I go about doing that? Can you please point me in the
right direction?
#Post#: 53730--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: January 16, 2025, 5:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stevec link ---
>
> Thank you [member=12]Incandescent[/member]!
>
> How do I go about doing that? Can you please point me in the
right direction?
>
--- End Quote ---
You do it by not paying the CC. In order to collect the money
the council must register the debt at the Traffic Enforcement
Centre, (the "court" without court rooms or judges). Once they
have done that they must serve you with an Order for Recovery.
This adds £10 to the amount, being the TEC registration fee. At
this stage, you can submit a Statutory Declaration using form
PE3
This form will be included with the OfR, but you can download it
from the TEC website: -
HTML https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-pe3-challenge-an-unpaid-penalty-charge-notice
Your case must match one of the reasons on the form.
Note that there is no possibility whatsoever of you getting a
CCJ. The process was specifially written so as to avoid this way
back in the 90s.
#Post#: 53738--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: January 16, 2025, 5:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you again [member=12]Incandescent[/member]!
I have downloaded the PE3 form but I don't see that I can claim
my case falls under one of the three scenarios i.e
- I did receive the PCN
- I made representations on three occasions and they responded
each time, although they did not follow through and reduce the
fine to £65 as they said they would in the last rejection letter
- I have not yet appealed to the Parking/ Traffic Adjudicator as
I have been waiting for a formal response to my request to
reduce the charge
So I don't see how I can match my case to one of these three
reasons, or am I missing something?
Am I able to claim their most recent rejection notice was not
valid because they did not address my question about the reduced
fine?
#Post#: 53740--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: January 16, 2025, 5:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure I can answer this one. Our administrator cp8759 is
better suited to this one, I think
#Post#: 53743--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: January 16, 2025, 5:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ah, I see, thanks.
I'll wait to see if [member=1]cp8759[/member] is able to help.
#Post#: 53746--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: January 16, 2025, 6:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=2986]stevec[/member] in the circumstances you cannot
file a statutory declaration saying you have not received a
Notice of Rejection, because you've shown it to us so you've
clearly received it.
The most sensible option at this point would be to file an out
of time appeal with the tribunal, I'm going to drop you a PM in
case you'd like me to represent you. Arguably you have nothing
to lose at this point.
#Post#: 55092--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: January 25, 2025, 1:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The tribunal has now listed for this a hearing, so the Charge
Certificate and the Order for Recovery are both kaput.
#Post#: 55173--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: January 26, 2025, 9:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you [member=1]cp8759[/member]!
I'm extremely grateful to you and the other members
([member=24]Hippocrates[/member], [member=7]mrmustard[/member]
and [member=428]H C Andersen[/member]) who have helped me on
this protracted case.
This is a fantastically generous community and I'm very glad I
found it!
#Post#: 70254--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 6, 2025, 10:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJc7Pu8v2gpq2ZeWVjSTfK1jWLUMa9kS/view,<br
/>at least you didn't have to pay £195!
#Post#: 70306--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: May 6, 2025, 2:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJc7Pu8v2gpq2ZeWVjSTfK1jWLUMa9kS/view,<br
/>at least you didn't have to pay £195!
>
--- End Quote ---
Que?
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page