DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 43396--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: October 31, 2024, 1:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Whose name is on the PCN.
Is the same name on the representations?
#Post#: 43439--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: October 31, 2024, 7:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Actually, no, the name on the PCN is my limited company and the
PCN was sent first to the registered office address before it
was forwarded to me at my home address. Didn't really think of
that when I submitted he representation....
I'm a director of the limited company but the registered keeper
is the lease company so I can't submit an representation on
their behalf.
However, as the PCN was sent to my limited company, can I
resubmit the representation as a director of that company? Or
will that not help my argument that the PCN should not have been
transferred to me?
#Post#: 43445--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: November 1, 2024, 1:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, only the Limited company can make a representation so do it
as Director on behalf of the company. Start by stating ' this a
representation by ....Ltd' and the same as before.
#Post#: 43468--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: November 1, 2024, 5:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
WAIT!
However, as the PCN was sent to my limited company,....
..yes, but by who?
There are only 2 scenarios which could fit here IMO:
1. The PCN is addressed to a corporate body and you made reps in
your own name without specifying your position and authority to
make reps on the company's behalf, or
2. The PCN is addressed to the registered keeper (lease company)
which has then forwarded to you, perhaps with a covering
letter??
Which?
#Post#: 43483--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: November 1, 2024, 6:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Apologies for not being clear in my last post.
It's scenario 1; the PCN was addressed to my LLC and yes, I made
the representation without specifying my position and authority
at the company.
So should I resubmit the same representation as before but
stating I am representing the LLC in my capacity as director?
Is it still worth submitting the 'signage not clear' grounds,
given they have already rejected that?
Or should I just go with the "council did not have the right to
transfer liability" grounds?
#Post#: 43540--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: November 1, 2024, 12:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We have already considered what the representation should be and
there is no need to change our mind now. Just get the
representation in using the LLP name.
#Post#: 46531--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: November 21, 2024, 11:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I've now received the latest response from Lambeth Council.
As they did last time, they have rejected the grounds of the
signage not being clear, which was to be expected.
However, they make no reference at all to the grounds of their
not having the right to transfer liability.
Do I submit a third appeal and draw their attention specifically
to those grounds?
HTML https://i.imgur.com/OxDXT1b.jpeg
HTML https://i.imgur.com/vi5Gaw6.jpeg
#Post#: 46548--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 21, 2024, 2:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=7]mrmustard[/member] Please sort this out.
#Post#: 51949--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: January 5, 2025, 3:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Happy New Year all!
I have an update on this PCN for you.
I took the decision at the end of November to give in and pay
the reduced amount of £65 while it was still available. However,
I attempted to do this on November 28, within 14 days of the
date of the previous letter, but the amount I was being prompted
to pay was £130.
The only suitable way I could find to contact Lambeth Council
about this was to submit their letter to them as 'additional
evidence', explain that I was not seeing the option to pay £65,
as the letter stated I would be able to, and requested that I be
informed how to pay the reduced amount.
I was away over December for a few weeks but kept checking the
Lambeth PCN payment link to see if they prompted amount would
drop to £65. It did not.
I returned at the end of December to find the response letter
below waiting for me. Instead of addressing my question about
the PCN amount, it seems to be a canned response, virtually
identical to the original one they sent, rejecting my appeal.
I continued to check the PCN payment link but it has now gone up
to £195.
As soon as I saw this, I re-tried the 'additional evidence'
approach, again submitting their letter of November 14 which
stated I had 14 days to pay the reduced amount of £65, pointing
out that the amount had now been increased to £195 and asking
for someone to get in contact with me to explain how to pay the
reduced amount.
I do not have much faith in receiving a useful response so
wanted to ask here what you suggest my next step should be?
As always, thank you for your sagely advice in advance!
HTML https://i.imgur.com/A82DH9M.jpeg
#Post#: 51968--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: January 5, 2025, 6:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The only suitable way I could find to contact Lambeth Council
about this was to submit their letter to them as 'additional
evidence', explain that I was not seeing the option to pay £65,
as the letter stated I would be able to, and requested that I be
informed how to pay the reduced amount.
Can we see this please?
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page