DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 40358--------------------------------------------------
Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain
tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: October 11, 2024, 7:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,
We have just received a PCN for exactly the same contravention
described in this thread (52 Failing to comply with a
prohibition on certain types of vehicles
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/52-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-vcertain-tyoes-of-vehicles-new-park-r/)<br
/>i.e. turning into New Park Road (D), recorded on August 26th.
[member=1]cp8759[/member], I'm tagging you as you made the last
posts to the other thread in May this year. From those, it looks
like the once solid defence of Lambeth not having GLA consent is
no longer valid, at least until March 2025.
If I have understood that correctly, is there any other chance
of appealing this PCN or should I cough up while it's still in
the discounted period?
Thanks!
Steve
#Post#: 40448--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: October 11, 2024, 5:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=2986]stevec[/member] as per the guidance here
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/<br
/>please post up the PCN you have received, it doesn't matter
how
similar you think it is to a previous case: for all we know
there might be a printing error on your PCN that makes it
invalid.
As a general rule, I can think of precisely zero scenarios where
I'd advise someone to pay a moving traffic PCN without even
trying a representation.
#Post#: 40465--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 12, 2024, 3:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As per cp above: never cough up without making a representation
as this is a sure way to join The Mugged Club!
#Post#: 40492--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: October 12, 2024, 10:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Got it.. thanks both of you for your replies!
Here is the front page of the PCN:
HTML https://i.imgur.com/n8ulZTn.jpeg
And here is a link to the location:
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/kVNdkEggoFyXBhmB7
On your point about not paying the PCN without first trying a
representation, I thought if you appealed and were rejected, you
ended up having to pay the full £130 rather than the discounted
£65. Is that not the case?
#Post#: 40505--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 12, 2024, 12:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
On your point about not paying the PCN without first trying a
representation, I thought if you appealed and were rejected, you
ended up having to pay the full £130 rather than the discounted
£65. Is that not the case?
NO. Homework: go onto their website and screenshot what it says
and report back please.
#Post#: 40512--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: October 13, 2024, 2:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Is the car leased and if so how long for and what type of lease?
In fact, a copy of the entire lease with only your name and
address covered would help us find a way out. There has to be a
necessary degree of permanence which may not exist in your
lease.
Forget about the discount, this forum is for people who want to
fight ( unless we advise against it) which entails some risk but
that is the cleverly designed system.
#Post#: 40544--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: October 13, 2024, 10:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the homework [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] :) . I
see that if I make the informal challenge within 14 days from
the date of issue, I will receive a discounted rate if my
challenge is unsuccessful. So I have until October 17th to do
this.
[member=7]mrmustard[/member], the car is on a business contract
hire lease which I tried to attach but got an 'upload folder is
full' error so could post it to imgur and embed the links here
if that would help.
It is a 48 month lease, due to end on 5/02/25.
Clause 5.2 states that "The Customer agrees to indemnify the
Lessor from any fines, fees, charges, invoices or penatlies
resulting from motoring offences or violation of traffic or
parking regulations or restrictions".
I'm guessing this is not what you would have been looking for
though?
I definitely count myself among those who want to fight as I
hate paying PCNs, but if it seems like there is little chance of
successfully challenging one, I'd prefer to pay the discounted
amount than the full amount.
Any advice you can give will be gratefully received!
#Post#: 40545--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: October 13, 2024, 10:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please email the full lease to mrmustard@zoho.com so I can look
for an escape route
#Post#: 40546--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: stevec
Date: October 13, 2024, 10:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Done, thank you!
#Post#: 40598--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth - 52 m Failing to comply with a prohibition on
certain tyoes of vehicles - New Park Road (D)
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 13, 2024, 5:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Sorry in Kos; but, what does the screenshot say about the price
increasing?
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 6
DIR Next Page