URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 40204--------------------------------------------------
       Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: kno
       Date: October 10, 2024, 9:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I came across a report from Reading Council where the TROs
       themselves had faults. I have seen cp8759 getting TROs, and
       analysing PCNs against it, but how does someone validate TROs
       itself?
       Do they go through audit, or does someone flag it up the totem
       pole after a certain time?
  HTML https://media.reading.gov.uk/news/council-apologises-to-motorists-and-urges-them-to-claim-refunds-for-incorrectly-issued-parking-penalties
       #Post#: 40217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: October 10, 2024, 10:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Most likely, an "activist" has obtained the TRO and found that
       it does not lawfully provide such restrictions as are sought to
       be enforced by the council revenue machine.
       Quite how someone "validates" a TRO would seem to depend on what
       meaning you are attempting to ascribe to the nebulous term
       "validate".
       #Post#: 40461--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: roythebus
       Date: October 12, 2024, 2:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       About 15-18 years ago my locl authority TROs had parking
       restrictions in streets that didn't exist. After intervention by
       "an activist" (me) and internet research (ppp) it was found that
       a number of roads in New Romney with parking restictions weren't
       actually on the TRO. Well, not for New Romney. they were
       included in the TRO for Lydd, some five miles distant. Somebody
       had perpetuated the mistake by cutting and pasting and posting
       in the wrong town. It saved me quite a bit in parking fines.
       Nobody had bothered proof reading anything.
       #Post#: 41469--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 19, 2024, 7:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: kno link ---
       >
       > I came across a report from Reading Council where the TROs
       themselves had faults. I have seen cp8759 getting TROs, and
       analysing PCNs against it, but how does someone validate TROs
       itself?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You read the TRO and check if it creates the restriction the
       authority purports to enforce, here's some examples:
       Sudhish Kumar v London Borough of Camden (2220603349, 28
       September 2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xb2YGXmxwlBbqKt19wcsqZ1GMnTyR_K8/view<br
       />which originates from this facebook post
  HTML https://www.facebook.com/groups/590815702229179/posts/744839203493494.
       Bertan Atalay v London Borough of Camden (2230051861, 1 March
       2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zh7lJdBnyNvLrOsMZzCjGRS78zUZ3KpG/view<br
       />which originated from here
  HTML https://web.archive.org/web/20230702125712/http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=148223&mode=linear.
       John Hayes v London Borough of Camden (223050740A, 8 January
       2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M28mFAUgQenu5ejE4F2uI3sVqN77DT-k/view<br
       />which originated here
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/camden-murray-street-code-52m-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-certain-ty/.
       Hershel Gluck v London Borough of Hackney (2210675864, 18 June
       2021)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tbpPzERxEpCfXsInYUJFNi5IGX75Cxzc/view
       #Post#: 41574--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 20, 2024, 1:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, is the council asking people to believe that none of these
       PCNs was challenged and/or that none of these questioned the
       applicable TRO and that somehow whatever errors were discovered
       escaped the attention of an army of council officers who penned
       rejections and assembled evidence for tribunals and/or that
       whatever errors were present escaped dozens of adjudicators over
       the years?
       IMO, as Big X said in the film The Great Escape..DIG!
       #Post#: 42639--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakes in TRO
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 27, 2024, 5:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/rotherhithe/exclusive-bus-lane-on-lower-road-that-catches-out-thousands-of-drivers-is-fake/
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1