URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 45222--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 12, 2024, 8:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > OP, here are the regs which apply:
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/71/schedule/2/made
       >
       > I have not referred to the 'appeals' regs because they don't
       bear upon this matter.
       >
       > Whether what's printed on the PCN is misaligned is not
       material because the regs don't refer to alignment! You are
       concerned with the regs and if the 'information' from one or
       more of the mandatory matters is not 'included' then these are
       your grounds(others will deal with any website issues).
       >
       > So, what's not included?
       >
       > IMO, it's obvious i.e. the penalty charge. And this is only
       obvious now because you've received the NTO.
       >
       > Correct me if I'm wrong but your PCN states:
       > Penalty charge £11
       >
       > You have subsequently found out from the NTO that this figure
       should be £80.
       >
       > Once one knows what the sum should be, then it's possible to
       see this in the PCN albeit that the reader has to ignore what is
       printed - £11 - and view the next line under a microscope
       knowing what one is looking for.
       >
       > But as drivers are not blessed with the gift of clairvoyance,
       it would be and was impossible to determine with confidence the
       penalty being demanded by reading the PCN alone, and this is the
       correct procedural test.
       >
       > In the council's response to these representations, I would
       take it badly if they repeated the non sequitur of their
       rejection to my challenge with a reference to 'you also made an
       informal challenge' as if this undermines my grounds which it
       does not i.e. this permanently printed part was readable,
       because it was acted upon, which shows that all free field
       information must have been similarly readable.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       So I should appeal the NTO by saying the ticket states £11?
       #Post#: 45254--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: November 12, 2024, 10:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think the time for thin submissions on this point is over.
       I suggest.
       PCN ******
       Procedural Impropriety
       I refer to the NTO issued on **** in respect of the above PCN.
       When I made my initial representations I included a copy of my
       PCN and described the printing as being misaligned. At that time
       I did not realise that it would be necessary for me to go into
       regulatory detail given that the CEO's error was so blatant and
       one which a proper consideration of those representations could
       not have failed to recognise.
       Your subsequent rejection and the NTO show that I was wrong.
       As the authority will see, the amount of penalty demanded in the
       PCN is £11 but in the NTO it is £80. Self-evidently therefore
       the PCN is defective and constitutes a procedural impropriety
       given that the 'amount of the penalty charge' is a 'regulatory
       matter' which must be included in the PCN. So, either £11 or £80
       is incorrect or perhaps both. But whichever is correct still
       represents a procedural impropriety as regards the PCN or the
       NTO.
       The authority cannot have it both ways and I submit would do
       well to accept now what is manifestly the case rather than let
       the adjudicator determine the same outcome.
       #Post#: 45390--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 13, 2024, 4:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > I think the time for thin submissions on this point is over.
       >
       > I suggest.
       >
       > PCN ******
       >
       > Procedural Impropriety
       > I refer to the NTO issued on **** in respect of the above PCN.
       >
       > When I made my initial representations I included a copy of my
       PCN and described the printing as being misaligned. At that time
       I did not realise that it would be necessary for me to go into
       regulatory detail given that the CEO's error was so blatant and
       one which a proper consideration of those representations could
       not have failed to recognise.
       >
       > Your subsequent rejection and the NTO show that I was wrong.
       >
       > As the authority will see, the amount of penalty demanded in
       the PCN is £11 but in the NTO it is £80. Self-evidently
       therefore the PCN is defective and constitutes a procedural
       impropriety given that the 'amount of the penalty charge' is a
       'regulatory matter' which must be included in the PCN. So,
       either £11 or £80 is incorrect or perhaps both. But whichever is
       correct still represents a procedural impropriety as regards the
       PCN or the NTO.
       >
       > The authority cannot have it both ways and I submit would do
       well to accept now what is manifestly the case rather than let
       the adjudicator determine the same outcome.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you so much for this. When I went online to appeal, they
       are asking for evidence. I presume I send the original pictures
       of the PCN?
       #Post#: 45423--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 13, 2024, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please screenshot all pages of their website and get back.
       #Post#: 45442--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 13, 2024, 8:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Please screenshot all pages of their website and get back.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/FnBChZp/Screenshot-2024-11-13-140121.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/FnBChZp
       .
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/yXpCndV/Screenshot-2024-11-13-140157.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/yXpCndV
       .
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/RTrBzFw/Screenshot-2024-11-13-140203.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/RTrBzFw
       #Post#: 45633--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 14, 2024, 11:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So should I post the original PCN?
       #Post#: 45641--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 14, 2024, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is usually a page with hoops to jump through. Tick this
       box etc. re grounds which do not apply. In your case same?
       #Post#: 45705--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 15, 2024, 5:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > There is usually a page with hoops to jump through. Tick this
       box etc. re grounds which do not apply. In your case same?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Apologies, yes there are a couple pages I missed.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/z85Fm1Q/Screenshot-2024-11-15-112107.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/k3yJGp5
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/1Zsh5LF/Screenshot-2024-11-15-112117.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/b1HqZPc
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Z6SgrMS/Screenshot-2024-11-15-112128.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/KjDsgrD
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/M87bvkq/Screenshot-2024-11-15-112245.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/5YLd0hq
       #Post#: 45706--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 15, 2024, 5:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That's the one.
       #Post#: 45707--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misaligned PCN - Borough of Redbridge
   DIR By: anonymous
       Date: November 15, 2024, 5:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > That's the one.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I am not sure I see anything that applies to my current
       situation.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page