URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ntown
       Date: September 20, 2023, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Council's evidence attached (1-4 of 7)
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 5568--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ntown
       Date: September 20, 2023, 3:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       5-7 of 7
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 5716--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ntown
       Date: September 21, 2023, 4:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Since there's been no further advice I'll prep the letter as it
       was sent last time with a different heading and send it off
       unless I hear different by about 23:30 - don't want to risk
       being outside the 28 day window
       #Post#: 5729--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 21, 2023, 5:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Your original reps look good enough to me. Their reponse to your
       original reps shows their total ignorance of the law. Hopefully
       you'll get a better response for reps against the NtO.
       BTW, I wouldn't park there again, as the notice is clear, and
       the next CEO to come along will probably issue a PCN for the
       correct contravention.
       #Post#: 5734--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ntown
       Date: September 21, 2023, 6:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cheers, I've sent it. Won't park there again as I don't need the
       hassle!
       
       #Post#: 5836--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: September 22, 2023, 5:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you get a Notice of Rejection please make sure to post it on
       here before doing anything. Hopefully they'll exercise a bit of
       common sense and just cancel it though.
       #Post#: 7499--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ntown
       Date: October 15, 2023, 8:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello the council rejected my representations. I've attached
       their notice of rejection.
       Please could you advise me on what to write in my appeal?
       Thanks
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 7501--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: October 16, 2023, 3:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The PCN was issued for the wrong contravention.
       Clearway parking only applies to the carriageway, not the
       footways or verges.  There is a sign on their rejection showing
       a ban on parking on these, so the PCN should have been issued
       for parking off-carriageway, assuming they have created a
       traffic order for this. The CEO who served the PCN got it wrong,
       basically.  In London, the ban applies from the 70s due to an
       Act of Parliament, but this was London-specific.
       As they haven't re-offered the discount, it is now a no-brainer
       to take them to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal as the penalty
       remains the same, and there are no additional costs.
       #Post#: 7528--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: October 16, 2023, 7:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       +1 do you want me to represent you at tribunal ? if so let me
       know
       #Post#: 7628--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trafford - Code 46 stopped where prohibited - Woodhouse Lane
       (Dunham Massey)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 17, 2023, 12:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=369]ntown[/member] I strongly recommend you take up
       Pastmybest's offer.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page