DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 38901--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: Eryobotrya
Date: September 30, 2024, 5:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
BTW, I found some scathing reviews of this PPC on Tripadvisor.
They document and confirm the underhand tactics they employ to
extract punitive damages from their victims. Would it be
worthwhile attaching a few of those reviews to my defence? Or at
a later stage perhaps - if it goes that far?
#Post#: 38905--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Eryobotrya link ---
>
> I found some scathing reviews of this PPC on Tripadvisor. They
document and confirm the underhand tactics they employ to
extract punitive damages from their victims. Would it be
worthwhile attaching a few of those reviews to my defence? Or at
a later stage perhaps - if it goes that far?
>
--- End Quote ---
Probably not - bear in mind that the only time people engage
with these companies is when they have been issued with a demand
for money. That's unlikely to lead to positive customer
experiences.
#Post#: 38907--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: b789
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I think you're overthinking this. The first point is to get the
claim struck out for failure to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a). The
second request is for further PoC for failure to fully comply
with the rest of CPR 16.4. The second request (order) asks that
should the claimant fail to fully comply with all the points in
the order, that the claim be struck out.
If you're not comfortable with a defence and draft order, you
are free to compile your own. To date, this defence and draft
order have not failed to get the claim discontinued or struck
out.
Your choice.
#Post#: 38908--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: b789
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Scathing reviews" are not a defence. It's a bit like saying to
the policeman who has pulled you over for speeding that it's not
fair because other drivers were going faster than me.
Should this ever escalate to the point of a hearing, you can of
course refer to those reviews in your WS. However, I fear you
are either going to ignore my advice and edit or provide your
own authored defence or you are relying on advice from
elsewhere.
I have provided advice and templates that are known to work. Use
them or lose them.
#Post#: 38911--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: Eryobotrya
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm not getting advice elsewhere, and the second strike out
request now makes sense. Until now, it was not made clear to me
that it was contingent on the claimant's failure to comply with
the judge's orders. I will be filing YOUR defence today.
I'm hoping it will ruin the rest of their week.
Watch this space for further developments.
#Post#: 38913--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: b789
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
My money is on a discontinuation. Anyone care to offer odds on a
different outcome?
#Post#: 38915--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: Eryobotrya
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You mean the claimant will drop their claim?
#Post#: 38918--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: September 30, 2024, 6:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Eryobotrya link ---
>
> You mean the claimant will drop their claim?
>
--- End Quote ---
Usually, yes.
If the claimant is using DCB Legal, a discontinuation is very
likely based on previous form. They'll string it out as long as
they can in the meantime.
#Post#: 38923--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: Eryobotrya
Date: September 30, 2024, 7:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You mean the PPC doesn't care about increasing their costs?
Really?
#Post#: 38924--------------------------------------------------
Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: September 30, 2024, 7:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In 2023 Civil Enforcement issued 33,220 court claims, that's 91
a day. Last financial year, they made roughly 49,000 requests
per month to the DVLA for vehicle keeper details. This process
is a machine, with Civil Enforcement caring very little about
the details of an individual case. A minority of cases costing
them money matters little to them if the majority simply pay up.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 18
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page