URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 91735--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 27, 2025, 9:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Only the defendant can claim costs. Any request for costs must
       be made by the defendant and can only relate to their own time.
       If I could claim costs for the time I spend on here giving
       advice, I could retire from my retirement! I can't though.
       AS I mentioned, what is much more important for now is sending
       that email to DCB Legal. Those shysters need to be squirming.
       #Post#: 91737--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: Eryobotrya
       Date: September 27, 2025, 9:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Again, can I sign on her behalf?
       #Post#: 91741--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 27, 2025, 9:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can sign anything in her name. You cannot sign "on behalf
       of". If you are signing something that is being sent
       electronically, then all you ned to is to type using the full
       name.
       #Post#: 91745--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: Eryobotrya
       Date: September 27, 2025, 10:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You mean her full name, not mine, right? Even though it's going
       from my email account.
       #Post#: 91748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 27, 2025, 10:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It matters not one iota from which email address it is sent.
       That's like saying it matters which post box you use to send a
       letter.
       If you are doing the form filling and work for her, in her name,
       then it has to be done as though it is her that is doing it. She
       would be the person signing it, so if you are doing this for
       her, you sign it using her name.
       #Post#: 91757--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: Eryobotrya
       Date: September 27, 2025, 11:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got it, and thx.
       #Post#: 93357--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: Eryobotrya
       Date: October 8, 2025, 7:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Reply received today from DCBL:
       --- Quote ---
       > Good morning,
       >
       > I write further to the below.
       >
       > Please note that the Claimant instructed us to discontinue
       proceedings on 08/09/2025, and ruling in Mazur v Charles Russell
       Speechlys was decided on 16/09/2025. The case law was therefore
       not implemented at the time of discontinance(sic.), therefore we
       have acted in accordance with authoritative instruction at the
       time of filing.
       >
       > We trust this clarifies our position.
       >
       >
       > Kind Regards,
       >
       > Lauren Travis
       > DCB Legal Ltd
       >
       > Tel: 0203 434 0433 | DX 23457 Runcorn
       > dcblegal.co.uk | Twitter | Linkedin | Facebook
       --- End Quote ---
       Is that enough to get them off the hook, assuming she is even
       correct about the date?
       #Post#: 93420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 8, 2025, 5:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That doesn’t get her or DCB Legal off the hook. Mazur simply
       confirmed the existing legal requirement. It did not introduce
       the requirement from the date of the judgment.
       Respond to her with the following:
       --- Quote ---
       > Subject: Claim [claim number] — Notice of Discontinuance
       signer’s authority
       >
       > Dear Ms Travis,
       >
       > Thank you for your email.
       >
       > Your response misunderstands the point in issue. The effect of
       Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP (16 September 2025) is
       declaratory of existing law: it reiterates that only an
       authorised person (or someone falling within a statutory
       exemption) may conduct litigation. That has been the position
       under the Legal Services Act 2007 (see ss.12–14 and Sch 3)
       irrespective of the date of the Mazur judgment. The question
       remains whether the individual who signed the N279 had the
       requisite authorisation or exemption at the time of signing.
       >
       > Please therefore answer the questions previously put:
       >
       > The signatory’s full name, capacity, and whether they are an
       “authorised person” within the meaning of the LSA 2007 (provide
       SRA/CILEX number and practising status).
       >
       > If not authorised, the precise exemption relied upon under
       Schedule 3 LSA 2007 that entitled that individual to conduct
       litigation and sign the N279 in these proceedings (enclose any
       sealed order or specific statutory provision).
       >
       > For the avoidance of doubt, Practice Direction 22 requires a
       signature with the individual’s name and capacity when signing
       on behalf of a party; “L. Travis, Paralegal” is not adequate for
       verification. If the N279 was not signed by an authorised (or
       exempt) person, please file and serve a compliant N279
       personally signed by an authorised person, with their full name
       and capacity clearly stated.
       >
       > Unless and until you provide satisfactory confirmation, I will
       reserve the right to place this correspondence before the Court
       and to seek my costs arising from any irregularity under CPR
       27.14(2)(g) and, if appropriate, wasted costs. Conducting a
       reserved legal activity without entitlement is also a criminal
       offence under the LSA 2007; I reserve the right to report any
       such conduct to the SRA.
       >
       > Please respond within 7 days.
       >
       > Yours faithfully,
       >
       > [Full name]
       > [Postal address]
       > [Email]
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 93423--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: Eryobotrya
       Date: October 8, 2025, 5:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That's exactly what I thunked. Thx.
       She's clutching at straws, and betrays a woeful lack of legal
       literacy in the process.
       Thought you were on a 3-week break?
       #Post#: 93425--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Civil Enforcement Ltd - N1SDT Claim form recieved for PCN
       isssued for Swanley Park parking in New Barn Rd
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 8, 2025, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’m not on a break. I will be out of the country for 3-4 weeks
       and may have limited time and access. I will be trying to stay
       on top of cases as much as I can.
       *****************************************************
       Page 14 of 18
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page