URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 46691--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: November 22, 2024, 12:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am handling the appeal at the tribunal against all three PCNs,
       I have just had this response come back from the council under
       the EIR
  HTML https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/eir-and-access-to-information/guide-to-the-environmental-information-regulations/what-are-the-eir/:
       [indent]
       We are unable to find a copy of the resolution.
       [/indent]
       [member=2768]Carlos CGD[/member] it looks like all your
       neighbours have been conned and can join the "mugged club".
       #Post#: 46727--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: November 23, 2024, 3:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @CP
       if there is no Resolution do the "mugged club" have any redress?
       were PCNs issued unlawfully ?
       #Post#: 46730--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: November 23, 2024, 4:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The default position is that parking on the footway whether 2 or
       4 wheels is not permitted and it appears that this has never
       been formally varied.
       So as '.. the signs provided for in this Schedule ['footway
       parking'] must only be placed to indicate the effect of an Act,
       order, regulation, bylaw, resolution or notice ..' and there
       isn't one then the default position applies IMO.
       But the council's actions in penalising some and not others
       based upon wholly unlawful signs cannot surely escape uncensured
       and with consequences.
       A DNC to avoid embarrassment?
       #Post#: 58866--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: Carlos CGD
       Date: February 19, 2025, 8:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > I am handling the appeal at the tribunal against all three
       PCNs, I have just had this response come back from the council
       under the EIR
  HTML https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/eir-and-access-to-information/guide-to-the-environmental-information-regulations/what-are-the-eir/:
       >
       > [indent]
       > We are unable to find a copy of the resolution.
       > [/indent]
       >
       > [member=2768]Carlos CGD[/member] it looks like all your
       neighbours have been conned and can join the "mugged club".
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I would like to say a big thank you to everyone on this site for
       all their help.
       The appeals were won and upheld at tribunal.
       I would never have stood a chance without your help.
       Thank you.
       #Post#: 58872--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: February 19, 2025, 8:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       2240510750
       At this scheduled personal hearing the Appellant Company were
       represented by Mr Murray-Smith, who attended via Teams.
       The Enforcement Authority did not attend and were not
       represented in person, by telephone or in vision.
       This is one of two appeals I am considering together arising out
       of Penalty Charge Notices issued for the same contravention, by
       the same vehicle, in the same road, on different occasions.
       Under Section 15(1) of the Greater London Council (General
       Powers) Act 1974 as amended by Section 76(3)(d) of the Road
       Traffic Act 1991 and by Section 15 of the London Local
       Authorities Act 2000, and Section 8 of the London Local
       Authorities and Transport for London Act 2008, a contravention
       occurs if a vehicle is parked with one or more wheels on or over
       any part of an urban road other than a carriageway.
       There appears to be no dispute that the vehicle was at this
       location, or that the Penalty Charge Notice was issued to it, as
       shown in the photographs/digital images produced by the
       Enforcement Authority. The images show the vehicle with all four
       wheels on the footway.
       The Appellant’s case is that footway parking is, or may be,
       allowed in this manner at this part of Darwin Drive.
       This contravention is often called ‘footway parking’. Footway
       parking is not allowed anywhere in Greater London unless an
       exemption applies. Any exemption should be indicated by a
       rectangular blue sign with a white border. The Enforcement
       Authority have produced an image of a sign, but not one taken
       contemporaneously with those taken at the issue of the Penalty
       Charge Notice. This sign shows parking with two wheels is
       permitted on the footway as prescribed by Item 3 in part 4 of
       Schedule 3 to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General
       Directions 2016, rather than that at Item 4 thereof, showing a
       vehicle wholly on footway.
       It appears that parking with all four wheels is or at least was
       permitted in parts of Darwin Drive and the Enforcement Authority
       had been asked to produce a copy of the exemption but it has
       responded that it is “unable to find a copy of the resolution”.
       It is clear that there must be resolution and the Enforcement
       Authority have accepted that footway parking is allowed. The
       issue being clearly raise as to exactly how and where in Darwin
       Drive this exemption applies, the burden must effectively shift
       to the Enforcement Authority to explain it.
       The Adjudicator is only able to decide an appeal by making
       findings of fact on the basis of the evidence actually produced
       by the parties and applying relevant law.
       Considering carefully all the evidence before me I cannot find
       as a fact that, on this particular occasion, a contravention did
       occur.
       Accordingly this appeal must be allowed.
       #Post#: 59023--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parked on footpath
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: February 20, 2025, 8:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome 1
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zoDH0HxViufTka2z-8C13fPKdLRDkBgI/view.
       Outcome 2
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoj7bNP-C305I-Cz6m_luHMe5YIP2ieQ/view.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page