URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 37040--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NIP received for alledged speeding on a Smart Motorway -
       offence was 5 weeks ago.
   DIR By: BertB
       Date: September 16, 2024, 7:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Charsiu link ---
       > Generally speaking, is it worth pursuing to see the evidence
       and whether the device was calibrated recently? I don't fancy
       sending him down paths with minute chances of success.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Due to the possibility of timeouts, courses to need to be booked
       within 3 months of offence date and completed within 4. He is
       halfway through that now so if he wants to delay replying for
       the full allowed term while he asks questions (he still needs to
       respond within the timescales stipulated on the NIP) and then
       think about it once he receives an offer, he may find that the
       offer of a course times out.
       What he can do that is often responded to quickly is ask for
       pictures 'to aid in the identification of the driver'. If it is
       a Hadecs3 system, it should show him an image of the gantry
       showing the posted limit at the time. But if he has gone from
       'it wasn't displaying that limit' to 'shall I ask for
       calibration certs' it sounds like he probably knows.
       #Post#: 37046--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NIP received for alledged speeding on a Smart Motorway -
       offence was 5 weeks ago.
   DIR By: Charsiu
       Date: September 16, 2024, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BertB link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Charsiu link=topic=3148.msg37001#msg37001
       date=1726484416]Generally speaking, is it worth pursuing to see
       the evidence and whether the device was calibrated recently? I
       don't fancy sending him down paths with minute chances of
       success.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       What he can do that is often responded to quickly is ask for
       pictures 'to aid in the identification of the driver'. If it is
       a Hadecs3 system, it should show him an image of the gantry
       showing the posted limit at the time. But if he has gone from
       'it wasn't displaying that limit' to 'shall I ask for
       calibration certs' it sounds like he probably knows.
       [/quote]
       I haven't spoken to him properly yet, I was just exploring what
       his actual options are and whether it is worth querying the
       validity of the camera evidence.
       Realistically, given that this was 5 weeks ago, I don't expect
       him to actually remember during that specific stretch of the
       motorway.
       My last message to him was to enquire with work on the NIP they
       received on the off chance that work is the RK and the
       possibility it falling out of 14 days, other than that, I said
       he may as well just face the penalty.
       #Post#: 37051--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NIP received for alledged speeding on a Smart Motorway -
       offence was 5 weeks ago.
   DIR By: The Rookie
       Date: September 16, 2024, 7:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Charsiu link ---
       >
       > Realistically, given that this was 5 weeks ago
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yet...
       --- Quote from: Charsiu link ---
       >
       > He "swears it didn't reduce show the reduced limit"
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There in lies the problem!
       #Post#: 37057--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NIP received for alledged speeding on a Smart Motorway -
       offence was 5 weeks ago.
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 16, 2024, 8:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Since his NIP took five weeks to get to him, there is a strong
       likelihood that his employer is not the RK. Although each
       recipient has 28 days to respond, there is no advantage to
       delaying a response. In fact there is a positive disadvantage
       for the driver because, as mentioned by BertB, they may get
       their NIP beyond the point where a course or fixed penalty might
       be offered.
       NIPS are usually issued fairly quickly by the police and five
       weeks would seem to indicate that the employer took almost all
       of the 28 days they had in which to respond.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page