URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36752--------------------------------------------------
       Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: September 13, 2024, 9:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, I have received a PCN of FR63395228 today saying that I have
       entered and stopped in the yellow box.
       I remember that day, but I remember that I have reversed back
       when I saw the front car stopping, but also people were crossing
       the road behind my car, so I had to reverse slowly
       The video provided shows I was reversing, but it cuts before I
       pulled all the way back.
       Do I have grounds to appeal?
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/1R655ik[/img]
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/MG75GowkoY1nUDny8
       #Post#: 36753--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: September 13, 2024, 9:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       photos
  HTML https://imgur.com/JrfHhaH
       photo 2
  HTML https://imgur.com/7RHExEg
       photo 3
  HTML https://imgur.com/rKBtF6H
       photo 4
  HTML https://imgur.com/R7dQdET
       #Post#: 36755--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: September 13, 2024, 9:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good shout here as you were reversing and when the camera pans
       out space beyond the box opened up so it's hard for them to say
       a contravention occurred.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/JzRfBkw.gif
       #Post#: 36794--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: September 13, 2024, 4:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Very good chance you were stationary only long enough to change
       gear to reverse
       #Post#: 36798--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: MrChips
       Date: September 13, 2024, 5:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can't see a point when you and the white car are simultaneously
       stationary = no contravention
       #Post#: 36800--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: September 13, 2024, 6:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can someone help me drafting a challenge against the PCN?
       I noticed that the video cut right after my break light turns
       off, moment before I continue reversing when there were no more
       people crossing behind me.
       #Post#: 36894--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: September 15, 2024, 3:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, thank you for your replies on contravention most likely did
       not occur.
       Any chance someone could guide me through the appealing process
       for it please?
       As I understand, I should contest that the contravention didn't
       occur on the basis of there was no point in time where the white
       car at the front and my car were simultaneously stationary.
       Should I also mention that even when I noticed that cars were
       not moving at the front even though there was space ahead, I
       have paused to shift gears however I had to move slowly as
       people were crossing behind me. Recording stopped when I clearly
       continued to reverse out of the box as soon as there were no
       people behind me.
       this is what I drafted:
       "I challenge liability for this PCN on the grounds that the
       contravention did not occur.
       Having had the opportunity to view the video footage I can see
       it shows that no contravention has taken place. The Regulations
       provide "…no person shall cause a vehicle to enter the box
       junction so that the vehicle has to stop within the box due to
       the presence of stationary vehicles." The footage shows space
       beyond the box junction opened up as camera pans out which would
       be sufficient to accommodate my vehicle. There was not a point
       in time where white car ahead of me and my car were
       simultaneously stationary. As such my vehicle was not forced to
       stop where it did due to stationary vehicles and it follows that
       no contravention took place.
       You can also see that I was in the yellow box for only long
       enough to change my gears to reverse as there was space behind
       me, however I was reversing cautiously as people were crossing
       behind me. The recording cut right after you can clearly see
       that I was continuing to reverse.
       I refer you to the decision of adjudicator Andrew Harman in
       Carlo Bergamini v Transport for London (2220539159) and
       adjudicator Jane Anderson in Katy Wong v Royal Borough of
       Kingston (2140345227)
       For these reasons, it follows that the notice must be cancelled.
       Yours faithfully,"
       Thank you for your help!
       #Post#: 39939--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: October 9, 2024, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       my first challenge got rejected from the Waltham Forest council.
       I'm moving on to the tribunal appeal.
       #Post#: 39940--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: October 9, 2024, 5:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please to post up the letter of rejection.
       #Post#: 40272--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Waltham Forest - contravention 31 entered yellow box - Lea
       bridge road E10 / Rigg approach E10
   DIR By: anthomy93
       Date: October 10, 2024, 3:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > Please to post up the letter of rejection.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       letter of rejection
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/ID9MwBv
       I believe I have a good chance appealing this as they have
       conveniently cut the footage as soon as my brake was released
       and continued to reverse when pedestrians stopped crossing, but
       space also opened up at the front simultaneously
       Can someone advise me on the next steps please?
       Thank you in advance!
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page