URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Non-motoring legal advice
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36133--------------------------------------------------
       Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after the
       event.
   DIR By: Korting
       Date: September 8, 2024, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In January 2019, a customer gave me a company cheque for work
       that I carried out on their private equipment in their home.
       Without telling me, they stopped the cheque.
       They said they weren’t happy with the work.
       I offered to return and correct it at no further charge, but
       they refused.
       At the end of January, I sent the director a ‘notice before
       action’ but didn’t follow it up.
       I know I have up to 6 years to issue proceedings, but do I have
       to issue another notice before action letter?
       #Post#: 36153--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Southpaw82
       Date: September 9, 2024, 3:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Who are you suing, the director or the company?
       #Post#: 36167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Korting
       Date: September 9, 2024, 4:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I suppose the company as its a company cheque, I could of course
       sue both the company and the director but do I then need to send
       two seperate letters action before claim?
       #Post#: 36192--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Southpaw82
       Date: September 9, 2024, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, you don’t need to send a letter before action at all, in
       the sense that your claim would still be lawful if you didn’t.
       However, it’s good practice to do so.
       The claim against the company seems to be the simpler one, as
       there are very few defences against a dishonoured cheque. Does
       the company have the funds to pay if you win?
       Any claim against the director runs into problems, as generally
       the person who signs the cheque isn’t liable, the person on
       whose account the cheque is drawn is liable. There are potential
       alternative causes of action against the director but much would
       depend on the facts.
       #Post#: 36206--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: DrSatan
       Date: September 9, 2024, 7:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What will matter here is who your contract was with. Your post
       makes reference to the director's home and a company cheque, but
       the detail matters.
       If your contract was with the director and he tried to pay you
       with the company's money, then it's the director who owes you
       payment for the work and you'd sue him.
       If, on the other hand, the company hired you to do work on the
       director's home, then it's the company you'd sue.
       I appreciate that with personal companies like this it may well
       be difficult to know exactly who the contract was with,
       especially 5 years down the line.
       Also please be aware that if you do have to sue the company,
       depending on their asset position you may find it very hard to
       actually get the money out of them, especially if they
       liquidate.
       #Post#: 36212--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Southpaw82
       Date: September 9, 2024, 8:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Who the contract is with isn’t relevant to the dishonoured
       cheque. It is a cause of action in its own right.
       #Post#: 36802--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Korting
       Date: September 13, 2024, 6:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: DrSatan link ---
       >
       > What will matter here is who your contract was with. Your post
       makes reference to the director's home and a company cheque, but
       the detail matters.
       >
       > If your contract was with the director and he tried to pay you
       with the company's money, then it's the director who owes you
       payment for the work and you'd sue him.
       > If, on the other hand, the company hired you to do work on the
       director's home, then it's the company you'd sue.
       >
       > I appreciate that with personal companies like this it may
       well be difficult to know exactly who the contract was with,
       especially 5 years down the line.
       >
       > Also please be aware that if you do have to sue the company,
       depending on their asset position you may find it very hard to
       actually get the money out of them, especially if they
       liquidate.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I was originally asked by the director to carry out the work,
       which I did.  When it came to paying the bill, she asked if she
       could pay by company cheque and could I make the invoice out for
       'office repairs'.
       I don't have that invoice, what I have is the invoice for
       carrying out work to her radiogram and a vintage radio.
       I suppose I could sue both the director and the company.
       I could also have a word with HMRC as she's obviously fiddling
       the tax.
       The company has assetts of thousands of pounds.
       #Post#: 36804--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: September 14, 2024, 12:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Korting link ---
       >
       > I could also have a word with HMRC as she's obviously fiddling
       the tax.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Of course she might be but it's certainly not obvious she is.
       "Office repairs" is not an entirely unreasonable description for
       what could in fact be a corporate asset and office equipment.
       #Post#: 36806--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: 666
       Date: September 14, 2024, 2:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Korting link ---
       >
       > [quote author=DrSatan link=topic=3074.msg36206#msg36206
       date=1725885575]
       > What will matter here is who your contract was with. Your post
       makes reference to the director's home and a company cheque, but
       the detail matters.
       >
       > If your contract was with the director and he tried to pay you
       with the company's money, then it's the director who owes you
       payment for the work and you'd sue him.
       > If, on the other hand, the company hired you to do work on the
       director's home, then it's the company you'd sue.
       >
       > I appreciate that with personal companies like this it may
       well be difficult to know exactly who the contract was with,
       especially 5 years down the line.
       >
       > Also please be aware that if you do have to sue the company,
       depending on their asset position you may find it very hard to
       actually get the money out of them, especially if they
       liquidate.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I was originally asked by the director to carry out the work,
       which I did.  When it came to paying the bill, she asked if she
       could pay by company cheque and could I make the invoice out for
       'office repairs'.
       I don't have that invoice, what I have is the invoice for
       carrying out work to her radiogram and a vintage radio.
       I suppose I could sue both the director and the company.
       I could also have a word with HMRC as she's obviously fiddling
       the tax.
       The company has assetts of thousands of pounds.
       [/quote]
       On the subject of tax, shouldn't you have kept that invoice for
       six years?
       #Post#: 36812--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Issuing County Court proceedings 5 years and 6 months after
       the event.
   DIR By: Korting
       Date: September 14, 2024, 4:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: 666 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Korting link=topic=3074.msg36802#msg36802
       date=1726270751]
       > [quote author=DrSatan link=topic=3074.msg36206#msg36206
       date=1725885575]
       > What will matter here is who your contract was with. Your post
       makes reference to the director's home and a company cheque, but
       the detail matters.
       >
       > If your contract was with the director and he tried to pay you
       with the company's money, then it's the director who owes you
       payment for the work and you'd sue him.
       > If, on the other hand, the company hired you to do work on the
       director's home, then it's the company you'd sue.
       >
       > I appreciate that with personal companies like this it may
       well be difficult to know exactly who the contract was with,
       especially 5 years down the line.
       >
       > Also please be aware that if you do have to sue the company,
       depending on their asset position you may find it very hard to
       actually get the money out of them, especially if they
       liquidate.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I was originally asked by the director to carry out the work,
       which I did.  When it came to paying the bill, she asked if she
       could pay by company cheque and could I make the invoice out for
       'office repairs'.
       I don't have that invoice, what I have is the invoice for
       carrying out work to her radiogram and a vintage radio.
       I suppose I could sue both the director and the company.
       I could also have a word with HMRC as she's obviously fiddling
       the tax.
       The company has assetts of thousands of pounds.
       [/quote]
       On the subject of tax, shouldn't you have kept that invoice for
       six years?
       [/quote]
       I would have probably given her the invoice for work done on the
       radiogram, I don't remeber giving her an invoice for 'office
       work'
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page