DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36256--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 9, 2024, 3:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I can only suggest you make a complaint to Hertz who clearly are
       totally unaware of the law and regulations in the UK related to
       parking and traffic enforcement.
       #Post#: 36283--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: September 10, 2024, 2:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > I can only suggest you make a complaint to Hertz who clearly
       are totally unaware of the law and regulations in the UK related
       to parking and traffic enforcement.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Probably a subject for the Flame Pit and way above my pay-scale,
       but would the clause from Hertz about paying finds and depriving
       customer of right to challenge PCNs come under Unfair Contract
       Terms legislation?
       #Post#: 36288--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 10, 2024, 2:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, the links to the PCN have disappeared.
       I have never been to that area and really have no idea about the
       PCN.
       As I understand it, you are saying that either:
       The vehicle in the video and PCN is not the one hired by you(VRM
       misread or clone), or
       It is the one hired by you and someone else was using it(with or
       without your permission).
       So, if it's 1, this is either because it's a misread of the VRM
       or the number plate has been cloned. Either of these, and
       especially the latter, should be brought to Hertz's attention
       and they should want to know. If it's a misread, then you would
       want to raise with them why their 'automated system' didn't pick
       this up. Irresponsible doesn't cover it. If it's a misread then
       they owe you the money. This is between you and them, let them
       take the matter to the council.
       But if it's a clone(the correct VRM) then you must tell Hertz
       that there's another car out there. This time flying motorbike,
       next time armed robbery?
       But if 2, then you need to ask yourself how how another person
       got access to your car. It's still your liability, but you might
       have someone else to look to for payment.
       So actually IMO you need to sort out which of the scenarios fits
       before you could even contemplate making formal reps.
       Is it 1(a), 1(b) or 2?
       #Post#: 36325--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN 52M Failing to comply with a prohibition
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: September 10, 2024, 7:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The hire agreement may have flaws.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page