URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 35949--------------------------------------------------
       Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds car
       park.
   DIR By: maisiethecat
       Date: September 6, 2024, 3:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       evening all,  i was recommended to post on here for some advice.
       My 20yr old daughter has had a notice come through the post
       advising her to pay £100 for overstaying the parking at a local
       mc donalds car park.  her and her friend,  got some food and sat
       chatting in mc donalds from 20.52hrs and departed at 23.01hrs.
       quote how someone can spend this long in mc donalds is beyond
       me,  shes a student so funds are tight with her part time job.
       hardest part is the notice came through when we were on holiday
       and have just got back last night so we have missed the window
       for reduce payment.
       is it worth talking to mc donalds,  google says mc donalds
       employ private companies to put ubers and people off using the
       car park for shopping,  there is nothing near by to this mc
       donalds and especially at that time of night.
       i've attached the notice.
       thanks,  even if its a case of lesson learn't for my daughter,
       mc donalds have parking charges after a certain time.
       thanks
       edit.  i will have to find another way of putting the notices
       up,   saying upload folder is full so they wont post
       #Post#: 35951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: maisiethecat
       Date: September 6, 2024, 4:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://ibb.co/6sXDkwq
  HTML https://ibb.co/Jx2mXp1
       #Post#: 35970--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 6, 2024, 7:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is all going to depend on how badly your daughter, or you,
       feel aggrieved by the charge. Was it issued fairly?
       Ask why the driver failed to notice the signs in the car park.
       Why was the driver not aware that there was a £100 charge if
       they breached the terms of parking?
       Is the vehicle registered in your daughter’s name? If so, she
       has received the Notice to Keeper (NtK). Under no circumstances
       should the Keeper identify the driver. MET do not know the
       identity of the driver, only that of the Keeper.
       There is no legal obligation for the Keeper to identify the
       driver. MET are not allowed to infer or presume that the Keeper
       was also the driver and there is persuasive case law to back
       that fact up.
       Any burden of proof is on MET to prove the identity of the
       driver. The only way they can know the identity of the driver is
       if the Keeper blabs it to them, inadvertently or otherwise.
       The Keeper and the driver are separate legal entities. The only
       way the MET can transfer liability for the charge from the
       unknown driver (to them), to the Keeper is if MET have fully
       complied with all the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms
       Act 2012 (PoFA). They have not.
       PoFA, Schedule 4, paragraph 9(2)(e)(i) requires that the NtK
       “invites” the Keeper to pay the charge. In the NtK you have
       shown us, there is no invitation nor any synonym of the word
       that invited the Keeper to pay it. Partial or even substantial
       compliance with PoFA is not sufficient.
       So, why didn’t the driver notice the signs? Were they
       conspicuous? Were the terms of parking prominently displayed?
       Was the charge of £100 “adequately” brought to the attention of
       the driver? Has MET fully complied with all the requirements of
       PoFA to be able to hold the Keeper liable for the charge? Has
       MET evidenced that the Keeper was the driver? Does MET have a
       valid contract flowing from the landowner, through their agent,
       McDonalds to issue PCNs in their own name?
       These are all questions that should be answered if the Keeper
       feels aggrieved and that the PCN has been issued unfairly. It
       comes down to whether the Keeper would rather pay the “mugs
       discount” and be done with it or whether they are prepared to
       fight it.
       Plan A is always try and get the landowner or their agent,
       McDonalds in this case, to tell MET to cancel the PCN. This is
       the easiest way to get it cancelled. Plan B would be to appeal
       to MET but I can guarantee that MET will reject it, no matter
       what is said in the appeal. No money in it for them.
       By rejecting the appeal, MET will be obliged to provide a POPLA
       code for the Plan C appeal. This is where there is a 45% chance
       of being successful and the appeal would be in the points I
       mentioned above. POPLA will not consider any mitigation, only
       points of law or the BPA Code of Practice (CoP) to see whether
       the PCN was issued correctly.
       If the Plan C POPLA appeal is not successful, Plan D would be to
       wait and see if/when MET decide to try and recover the alleged
       debt through the county court. MET can be litigious but the
       county court is the ultimate dispute resolution service. Only a
       judge would decide whether a debt was owed or not.
       The decision has to be made based on the original questions I
       asked at the beginning of this post.
       #Post#: 36006--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 7, 2024, 7:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ?
       '...as the registered keeper...you are now invited to either pay
       or...'(Third para. in main body of NTK on page 1). So no mileage
       with this defence, IMO.
       OP, if you are the keeper then submit something. If it's
       difficult to understand why signs weren't seen, then maybe they
       weren't visible enough. You can say that you've spoken to the
       driver who has no recollection of seeing the signs referred to
       in the NTK and therefore you have reason to believe that
       contrary to what might appear in their records the signs at this
       site are not clearly visible during hours of darkness.
       Wait for others.
       #Post#: 36014--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 7, 2024, 7:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I agree. I had not noticed the "invitation" for the keeper to
       pay. The NtK is therefore PoFA compliant. However, any appeal
       should still be made as the Keeper without identifying the
       driver as there could be issues with the signage that negates
       Keeper liability under PoFA, especially if the £100 charge was
       not "adequately" brought to the attention of the driver.
       If possible, take some photos of the signs and the general
       layout of the car park, under similar lighting conditions. Do
       not use flash or headlights to illuminate the signs. A close up
       of the signs is useful for us to see if all the legal and BPA
       CoP requirements for the signs have been adhered to.
       #Post#: 36036--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: maisiethecat
       Date: September 7, 2024, 2:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       thanks all for replying,  i did call mc donalds today, initially
       the manager was saying just appeal, and i said under what
       grounds,  we are not denying my daughter spent nearly 2hours
       with her friends at the restaurant but we weren't aware there
       was any time limit on eating at the restaurant,  she said let me
       talk to someone,   she came back on i gave her the reference and
       she said we will sort it out our end and get it overturned.   I
       dont have anything in writing,  should i message MET and advise
       them this.
       #Post#: 36046--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: September 7, 2024, 4:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would get something in writing from McDonald's ideally. We've
       seen too many cases of promises being made on the phone, only
       for them not to materialise.
       It's not cancelled until it's cancelled.
       #Post#: 36060--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: September 8, 2024, 4:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On the possibly misguided assumption that the apparent offer has
       been made in good faith it can be sensible to go through the
       motions of payment. Some say not found, some zero due. Some
       unchanged.
       At least that enables verification of whether it has been
       cancelled sooner.
       #Post#: 36125--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Daughter has received a parking charge for using mc donalds
       car park.
   DIR By: maisiethecat
       Date: September 8, 2024, 3:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: slapdash link ---
       >
       > On the possibly misguided assumption that the apparent offer
       has been made in good faith it can be sensible to go through the
       motions of payment. Some say not found, some zero due. Some
       unchanged.
       >
       > At least that enables verification of whether it has been
       cancelled sooner.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       i logged onto the met payment system today to appeal,  and it
       shows the parking notice number not found,  i tried the pay for
       parking and again,  said not found,  i have screenshot and then
       videoed me trying both options and then the response.    Could
       it be that quickly with mc donalds.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1