URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 36973--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected' 
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 16, 2024, 2:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > I note that a partial statement setting out a version of
       events has been included in the images of the PR, which will be
       before the court. The version of events in that statement
       appears to contradict the OP's statement that the RK was invited
       to provide "correct" driver details.
       --- End Quote ---
       Indeed. It seems the police knew exactly what had transpired
       (with over 50 driver nominations being made mentioning the same
       address).
       I think your friend needs to plead guilty either online or by
       post and keep as far away from a courtroom as he can.
       
       #Post#: 36974--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected' 
   DIR By: The Rookie
       Date: September 16, 2024, 3:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: f111 link ---
       >
       > there was no intention to dripfeed info, I'd sent what i had
       in good faith, not seen all this before.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Maybe not, but between you and the 'perp' that is what has
       happened and as you can imagine it creates some frustration
       among those trying to help.
       Based on THE INFORMATION WE HAVE I agree with AF, pleading
       guilty to the charge and not attempting any mitigation or
       defence seems the best route, I can't imagine anything he could
       (truthfully) say will make things better and with a scope to
       make things a LOT worse.
       #Post#: 59846--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected' 
   DIR By: f111
       Date: February 27, 2025, 4:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       UPDATE:
       Hi All,
       To recap since this post was last year - a relative foolishly
       duped into paying someone to 'deal with speeding letter', he
       gave the subsequent police letter to the same people, eventually
       police wrote to him saying (paraphrased) "this isn't true, and
       the address/ details you gave are from a nip farm". I
       subsequently asked here for best suggestions/advice.
       I wanted to send an update on this as promised, as others had
       made contact that they were in the same position too. ('NIP
       farms' etc)
       I recommended the advice given here. He replied to the letters
       with minimal information, not saying anything more than what was
       asked/ needed.
       His hearing was postponed once, but finally took place a few
       days ago.  He did not attend (as advised).
       He was concerned he'd receive a ban or much worse ie a criminal
       conviction.
       He received a letter today giving him 6 points. I couldn't see
       the offence code on the letter, but loaded the letter to chatgpt
       which has said it is an MS90, inferred from the reference to
       "section 172(3) of the RTA 1988". Nothing on the letter about a
       fine.
       Thanks again to those who helped, and all the best to anyone
       going through the same. Lesson also to those tempted to use
       those scammers - they left him high and dry and just stopped
       answering his calls when sh*t hit the fan, despite all their
       promises when he first paid them. He only mentioned it to me
       when they had already replied to two letters for him then gone
       AWOL, probably because I would've told him it was a bloody
       stupid decision in the first place!
       #Post#: 60567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected' 
   DIR By: f111
       Date: March 4, 2025, 11:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Further note to add - He has been fined £583 which wasn't on the
       first letter he received (referenced above).
       PS: His uber license is up for renewal, which he applied for a
       few months ago - Unclear what will become of this with MS90.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page