DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 8730--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 30, 2023, 8:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Costs application to follow. NOR sent to the Tribunal is not a
true copy of the original which was sent to the appellant. An
important redaction made by the council concerning apparent
advice from London Councils regarding the compliance of their
PCN and EN. ::)
I feel the onset of another video coming on.
#Post#: 11509--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 29, 2023, 3:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Havering's staff need INSET.
Case reference 2230439332
Cost Details
Application by Appellant
Decision date 28 Nov 2023
Adjudicator Edward Houghton
Decision Cost award allowed
Direction -
Reasons The Appellant did not appear in person but was
represented by Mr Morgan. Having heard his submissions I
consider that this is a case where the statutory criteria for
the making of an Order are met. The legal deficiencies in the
Council’s documentation were drawn to its attention at an early
stage and were in my view incontrovertibly correct, potential
grounds of appeal appearing that were inapplicable in the case
of Bus Lane contraventions. The Council should have accepted the
representations on this point and its failure to do so was in my
view wholly unreasonable. The amount claimed seems to me a
modest and proportionate sum and I make the order in that
amount.
;D >:( ::)
They must be raking in thousands with these outrageously-worded
documents. Kingston has the same errors on their PCNs.
#Post#: 11510--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: November 29, 2023, 3:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/13xqeZ23037Nbq451v-7z-F3YN6utZc63.
#Post#: 17730--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: March 19, 2024, 2:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
ICO decision notice
HTML https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2024/4028203/ic-260961-h0n2.pdf,<br
/>the council has now responded that:
[indent]
TES Ltd is the Manufacturer and Small Blue is the model.
[/indent]
#Post#: 17731--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: March 19, 2024, 3:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=1]cp8759[/member]: Videalert is the camera which has a
certificate?
#Post#: 17746--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Driving in a Bus Lane within the restricted period.,
Insufficient Upright Signs? Challenge Rejected
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: March 19, 2024, 4:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=1]cp8759[/member]: Videalert is the camera which has a
certificate?
>
--- End Quote ---
I think so but you'd have to check the certificate.
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 3
DIR Previous Page