DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 36531--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN code 27 - Leyton Road/Rose Way E20 - Parked in special
enforcement area
DIR By: bertie21980
Date: September 11, 2024, 6:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
>
> You used the HTML code, rather than the BBcode, which puts
the image in a post.
>
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/Z18YCd7/leyton-road-rejection-letter-1.png
HTML https://ibb.co/5x8nVTw
>
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/gzMzFDt/leyton-road-rejection-letter-2.png
HTML https://ibb.co/6gRgJ4D
>
--- End Quote ---
Thanks john. I always forget which link I should use
#Post#: 41790--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN code 27 - Leyton Road/Rose Way E20 - Parked in special
enforcement area
DIR By: bertie21980
Date: October 21, 2024, 5:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello everyone, I finally got my Notice of Rejection. I got it a
few weeks ago so I should have posted it on here earlier. Is
there any idea on what I should do now? On the the details of my
representations box which is on the next page, I'm guessing I
should write my appeal in that section?
HTML https://i.ibb.co/CQrZdLF/NTO1-edit.png
HTML https://ibb.co/cQmH5qd
HTML https://i.ibb.co/LxPLgdw/NTO2.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/K2GMsxZ
#Post#: 41792--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN code 27 - Leyton Road/Rose Way E20 - Parked in special
enforcement area
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: October 21, 2024, 5:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> On the the details of my representations box which is on the
next page, I'm guessing I should write my appeal in that
section?
--- End Quote ---
No, do it on-line as suggested on the PCN, (2nd paragraph of the
section headed "Making Representations").
#Post#: 41811--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN code 27 - Leyton Road/Rose Way E20 - Parked in special
enforcement area
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: October 22, 2024, 2:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Hello everyone, I finally got my Notice of Rejection. I got it
a few weeks ago so I should have posted it on here earlier. Is
there any idea on what I should do now? On the the details of my
representations box which is on the next page, I'm guessing I
should write my appeal
--- End Quote ---
Just to clear up the terminology:
You received a PCN,
You submitted a challenge (post Reply#7)
This was declined (post Reply#10)
You now have a Notice to Owner (NtO), not a Notice of Rejection,
which will appear if they reject your representations, leaving
you free to appeal to the Tribunal.
That said:
--- Quote ---
> Is there any idea on what I should do now?
--- End Quote ---
As Incandescent wrote, youi now need to make representations
online, keeping a copy.
But you must run a draft past the experts here first.
Re-read carefully your challenge and their response.
How well do you think they considered your challenge in their
reply?? (this is neither atrick nor a rhetorical question)
Note the suggestions of the experts here.
Write a draft, probably based on the above and your original
challenge, and post here for comment.
DO not miss deadline for responding (which is?)
Make reps in time and keep a copy.
#Post#: 41943--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN code 27 - Leyton Road/Rose Way E20 - Parked in special
enforcement area
DIR By: bertie21980
Date: October 22, 2024, 6:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
>
> [quote]Hello everyone, I finally got my Notice of Rejection. I
got it a few weeks ago so I should have posted it on here
earlier. Is there any idea on what I should do now? On the the
details of my representations box which is on the next page, I'm
guessing I should write my appeal
--- End Quote ---
Just to clear up the terminology:
You received a PCN,
You submitted a challenge (post Reply#7)
This was declined (post Reply#10)
You now have a Notice to Owner (NtO), not a Notice of Rejection,
which will appear if they reject your representations, leaving
you free to appeal to the Tribunal.
That said:
--- Quote ---
> Is there any idea on what I should do now?
--- End Quote ---
As Incandescent wrote, youi now need to make representations
online, keeping a copy.
But you must run a draft past the experts here first.
Re-read carefully your challenge and their response.
How well do you think they considered your challenge in their
reply?? (this is neither atrick nor a rhetorical question)
Note the suggestions of the experts here.
Write a draft, probably based on the above and your original
challenge, and post here for comment.
DO not miss deadline for responding (which is?)
Make reps in time and keep a copy.
[/quote]
Yes, I have received a notice to owner (not notice of
rejection). I received the letter on the 8th of October and they
say I have 28 days to make payment or make representations. The
deadline should be the 5th of November.
I guess my representations is the same as the appeal that I made
so I should tick the box marked - the alleged contravention did
not occur
I am writing to challenge this PCN as I believe the alleged
contravention did not occur.
The CEO's photos show that the contravention did not occur
because the only part of my vehicle which was parked adjacent to
the footway was my rear nearside wheel which I estimate was at
least 3 feet outside the prohibited area, indeed even well
beyond the sloping kerbstone at that point. No other part of my
vehicle was adjacent to the footway and therefore the
contravention did not occur. They also attempt to show that
pedestrians were impeded by the presence of my vehicle, however,
this is not the test.
The contravention is as defined and just as a motorist would not
be permitted to park in the prohibited area even if they were
not obstructing pedestrians similarly the authority cannot
misapply the contravention simply because part of a vehicle - in
this case at least 6 feet from the footway- might impede
pedestrians.
Would this be ok as its word for word from what I posted for my
appeal or should I amend it in some way?
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page