DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
*****************************************************
#Post#: 32487--------------------------------------------------
NIP addressed to company
DIR By: Foxy01
Date: August 6, 2024, 1:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If a NIP (S172) is sent to a company in the name of the company,
then the company should as I understand it fill in section B of
the form and nominate the driver (as the company cannot be the
driver). The driver should then receive a NIP in their own name
and complete it filling in section A. Is this correct? If the
company fill out section A with the drivers details can this
cause issues at a later date? Or do most Police take the
pragmatic view that they've got the details they want?
#Post#: 32488--------------------------------------------------
Re: NIP addressed to company
DIR By: Southpaw82
Date: August 6, 2024, 1:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Depends what Section A and Section B say.
#Post#: 32577--------------------------------------------------
Re: NIP addressed to company
DIR By: The Rookie
Date: August 7, 2024, 10:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There is no fixed format for the S172 reply part on a NIP, so
section A and B is meaningless to anyone but the person looking
at it!
#Post#: 32740--------------------------------------------------
Re: NIP addressed to company
DIR By: NewJudge
Date: August 8, 2024, 3:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I imagine in this case Section A is headed "Complete this
section of you were the driver" and Section B is headed
"Complete this section if the driver was somebody else". Or
something like that.
#Post#: 32743--------------------------------------------------
Re: NIP addressed to company
DIR By: andy_foster
Date: August 8, 2024, 3:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Any s. 172 response other than from the driver admitting being
the driver is merely information, and as long as the substance
of the requirement has been complied with, that's all good as
far as the law is concerned.
As regards what any given CTO might or might not consider
acceptable - that's anyone's guess.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1