DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 35997--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: H-M3
Date: September 7, 2024, 6:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> Penalty Charge Notice: AF98910562
> Vehicle registration: RX64VTG
> Contravention date: Saturday, 20 Jul 2024 22:32
> Contravention: Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
> Street: ILFORD LANE
> Location:
> Status: Representation Rejected
>
> *****
>
> Penalty Charge Notice: AF98910278
> Vehicle registration: RX64VTG
> Contravention date: Saturday, 20 Jul 2024 23:26
> Contravention: Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
> Street: ILFORD LANE
> Location:
> Status: Representation Rejected
>
> *******
>
--- End Quote ---
Thanks! :)
#Post#: 36687--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 12, 2024, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
A few posts that added no value have been removed, if you're a
newbie seeking help be constructive in your comments and take
the advice that is given gracefully. If someone tells you to
create your own thread, the appropriate response if you've
already made one is to provide a link rather than get all snotty
about it.
Please be nice to each other, we're all on the same team here.
#Post#: 36718--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: September 13, 2024, 4:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Well said. Appeal now filed.
@cp8759 As they are asking for less than the legal amount, I
decided not to use the penalty exceeded the amount ground! ::)
#Post#: 43643--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 2, 2024, 11:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=1]cp8759[/member] Thanks for the other case sent to me
today. :)
#Post#: 43786--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 3, 2024, 1:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] Thanks for the other case sent to me
today. :)
>
--- End Quote ---
2240333189.
Tomorrow is the hearing : I will do my best and incorporate the
collegiate views. ;) Now I wear the T shirt, I may well be
recognised.* Literally, not metaphorically. Plus Lotus Esprit
necklace - the car as in The Spy Who Loved Me. The adj. has
already seen it once and allowed the appeal. ;) Bus lane last
week. May be that what was why I was not mentioned? **
*
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/how-do-we-get-more-people-to-fight-their-pcns/msg41917/#msg41917
**
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/motorcycle-in-bus-lane-confusing-sign/msg43158/#msg43158
What fun this is.
#Post#: 43799--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: mickR
Date: November 3, 2024, 2:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=2685.msg43643#msg43643
date=1730563966]
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] Thanks for the other case sent to me
today. :)
>
--- End Quote ---
2240333189.
Tomorrow is the hearing : I will do my best and incorporate the
collegiate views. ;) Now I wear the T shirt, I may well be
recognised. Literally, not metaphorically. Plus Lotus Esprit
necklace in The Spy Who Loved Me.
[/quote]
please don't wear Ursula's Anderss's bikini :-\
#Post#: 43801--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 3, 2024, 2:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: mickR link ---
>
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=2685.msg43786#msg43786
date=1730661498]
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=2685.msg43643#msg43643
date=1730563966]
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] Thanks for the other case sent to me
today. :)
>
--- End Quote ---
2240333189.
Tomorrow is the hearing : I will do my best and incorporate the
collegiate views. ;) Now I wear the T shirt, I may well be
recognised. Literally, not metaphorically. Plus Lotus Esprit
necklace in The Spy Who Loved Me.
[/quote]
please don't wear Ursula's Anderss's bikini :-\
[/quote]
As the Doctor said: No. :D
#Post#: 43945--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 4, 2024, 12:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
One cancelled due to no PCN adduced. Waiting for the other
decision re the £110 subceeded amount. As fate would have it, I
had the same adjudicator for the 2.30 hearing too and they
demanded £130 in that case.
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/yellow-box-junction-pcn-3025/msg43944/#msg43944
We also had an interesting chat about practice direction re 14
days to submit a skeleton argument and the ethos of the Tribunal
and representatives.......... ???
I half-expected for these two cases to be rescheduled because I
was later than usual in submitting my evidence due to "case
management issues" re other cases last week. I had some busman's
holiday as I had two cases with 22 PCNs to deal with last week
which were rescheduled without my knowledge. I won one of them
but really, when one has asked quite properly for cases to be
consolidated and gone through the necessary hoops, one expects
something better than this. (Lewisham cases)
Anyway, back to the cases in hand. He was not with me re the PCN
locus nor the limitation to one ground. But, we will see. I did
spell out the NOR is an important document and it is not good
enough for a council to respond to the issue in their evidence
pack. And I mentioned a John Lane decision re similar issues re
pictures.
Anyway, Mt Everest conquered. A.N.Other adjudicator must have
heard it all. ;D
#Post#: 44007--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 4, 2024, 6:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The other one won too.
The amount of the penalty charge for moving traffic
contraventions in London Borough of Redbridge is £130.
It is not open to the Enforcement Authority to seek a sum
different from the amount prescribed.
#Post#: 44494--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ilford lane box junction. 31j
DIR By: H-M3
Date: November 7, 2024, 7:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to say a very BIG THANKS to Hippocrates for his support
and attending to this for me. Both cases positive outcome,
thanks to all for your support too!
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 6
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page