URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 31688--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 31, 2024, 3:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, if UKPC or DCB Legal hold an old address for you, you are at
       high risk of a CCJ by default instead of an easy win. Your very
       first action is to send a data rectification notice to the DPOs
       of both firms ordering them to rectify your data with your
       current address for service and for them to erase your old
       address.
       #Post#: 31689--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: July 31, 2024, 3:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Parking event was in Feb 2024, address change was requested with
       DVLA in December 2023. The process was delayed since the
       Registered Keeper is a victim of domestic abuse (and their
       address details are being protected) they have to follow
       different (manual) process with a specific case worker to
       perform transactions with the DVLA.
       I was probably a bit enthusiastic last night but will probably
       recend on my idea of raising a Counterclaim.
       I am not sure there is a restriction on requesting registered
       keeper details twice, especially since most of them use a third
       party software service which obtains the details in turn from
       DVLA. There seems to be no restrictions regarding this in the
       guidance issued :
  HTML https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/624dabc7e90e0729f6bf8167/inf-266-release-of-information-from-dvlas-registers.pdf
       Additionally, my understanding is CPR requires service of
       documents to the Defendants current address and the Claimant
       must use reasonable steps to verify the address, checking if the
       address has changed and registered keeper is same on your
       computer seems a reasonable thing to do.
       This is a good article that covers this point:
  HTML https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2018/03/27/service-of-the-claim-form-at-the-old-address-the-hierarchy-of-measures-a-claimant-has-to-take/
       The SAR will also reveal whether the previous notices sent were
       returned to DCBL or UKPC which will further strengthen the
       point.
       The claimant in Smith -v- Hughes & the MIB [2003] EWCA Civ 65
       had their case struck out for sending a claim to the last known
       address due to this.
       A claimant must have “reason to believe” that the address is no
       longer current.  Whether that is an objective or subjective test
       is not clear.  Further it is not clear how diligent a claimant
       has to be in seeking out alternative methods of service.
       However it is clear that, with the change of the rules, simply
       serving at the “last known address” is a dangerous step.
       The claimant must go through the hierarchy of measures set out
       in CPR 6.9.(3) before service at the last known address is
       possible.
       CPR 6.9(3)
       (3) Where a claimant has reason to believe that the address of
       the defendant referred to in entries 1, 2 or 3 in the table in
       paragraph (2) is an address at which the defendant no longer
       resides or carries on business, the claimant must take
       reasonable steps to ascertain the address of the defendant’s
       current residence or place of business (‘current address’).
       (4) Where, having taken the reasonable steps required by
       paragraph (3), the claimant –
       (a) ascertains the defendant’s current address, the claim form
       must be served at that address; or
       (b) is unable to ascertain the defendant’s current address, the
       claimant must consider whether there is –
       (i) an alternative place where; or
       (ii) an alternative method by which,
       service may be effected.
       (5) If, under paragraph (4)(b), there is such a place where or a
       method by which service may be effected, the claimant must make
       an application under rule 6.15.
       (6) Where paragraph (3) applies, the claimant may serve on the
       defendant’s usual or last known address in accordance with the
       table in paragraph (2) where the claimant –
       (a) cannot ascertain the defendant’s current residence or place
       of business; and
       (b) cannot ascertain an alternative place or an alternative
       method under paragraph (4)(b).
       #Post#: 31691--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: July 31, 2024, 3:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > OP, if UKPC or DCB Legal hold an old address for you, you are
       at high risk of a CCJ by default instead of an easy win. Your
       very first action is to send a data rectification notice to the
       DPOs of both firms ordering them to rectify your data with your
       current address for service and for them to erase your old
       address.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks for this, I have specified the new address on the
       Acknowledgement of Service (address for communication).
       I believe this should help alleviate the concern? Please help
       advice if the address rectification is really required?
       If the SAR reveals other PCNs then I could deal with them
       separately is what I was thinking.
       #Post#: 31693--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: July 31, 2024, 3:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It would be sensible to send a rectification notice anyway.
       #Post#: 31712--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 31, 2024, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The address given on the AoS will do for the CNBC. However, you
       must send the DPOs of the PPC and their solicitor a data
       rectification notice and it must also instruct them to erase
       your old address. The highlighted word is there for a reason.
       Of course the claimant is required to do due diligence for the
       correct and current address for service. However, that does not
       mean that they do. In fact, they are likely not to and hope. For
       a CCJ by default.
       If you get a CCJ by default, yes you can get it set aside if the
       claim was not served correctly. However, do you really want to
       go through the whole process of a set aside with the associated
       risk that they then discontinue before a trial and you don’t
       recover your costs? Not worth it. Just do the DRN to the DPOs.
       If the SAR reveals other PCNs, then it is easier to deal with
       them separately in a new thread if they are for different
       locations. If they are all for the same location then use this
       thread.
       #Post#: 31717--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: The Rookie
       Date: July 31, 2024, 8:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FaeLLe link ---
       >
       > I am not sure there is a restriction on requesting registered
       keeper details twice
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You may not be sure, I am.
       Did you read the KADOE contract the requests are made under,
       also not enough time has elapsed to suggest they should have
       used a trace mechanism.
       At least if (unlikely) it gets to court there should be no
       question of unreasonableness under the circumstances.
       #Post#: 31719--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 31, 2024, 8:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just send the defence as advised. Make sure you use the correct
       email address and also send it to yourself. Make sure you get
       the auto-response from the CNBC.
       The sooner you do, the sooner this will be over. No point
       waiting for the SAR as they have up to 30 days to respond and
       may not achieve that. There will be nothing in the SAR that is
       going to assist you.
       #Post#: 31727--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: July 31, 2024, 10:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > Just send the defence as advised. Make sure you use the
       correct email address and also send it to yourself. Make sure
       you get the auto-response from the CNBC.
       >
       > The sooner you do, the sooner this will be over. No point
       waiting for the SAR as they have up to 30 days to respond and
       may not achieve that. There will be nothing in the SAR that is
       going to assist you.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Agree. Thank you for your insights, I will draft one tonight and
       share it.
       With regards to the Draft order I understand it needs to be in
       MS Word format in the N24 General form of order. Should I move
       the content into that format or is it not advised to do that for
       CNBC claims?
       Thought I would make it easier for the court to progress this
       Claim and not fall short of what is required.
       #Post#: 31760--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 31, 2024, 1:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Simply send both the short defence and draft order as PDF
       attachments in an email. All that is needed to be edited is the
       claimant and defendant names, claim number and an electronic
       signature and date on the defence. Nothing to be edited on the
       dept aft order.
       #Post#: 33353--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harbour Exchange - PCN despite being permitted - Parking
       Longer than permitted - No PCN & Claim sent to previous add
   DIR By: FaeLLe
       Date: August 14, 2024, 9:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello all,
       Quick update.
       Data rectification request was sent to the Claimant, no response
       to date but acknowledgement received from their Data Protection
       team.
       Also this morning I Got a letter by post to the address I
       provided. It states the Defence was received and a copy is being
       served on the claimant or their solicitor.
       It states claimant will now attempt to resolve dispute by
       contacting me or inform the court that they wish to progress.
       The letter also states, claimant must contact court within 28
       days after receiving a copy of the defence after which the case
       will be put on stay.
       Should I apply to strike out the claim (default judgement) if I
       do not receive a response after 28/30 days?
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page