DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 37214--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: September 17, 2024, 10:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Wait for others to have a look but my approach is to home in on
their rejection and say why it doesn't work.
#Post#: 37297--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: mkdon
Date: September 18, 2024, 4:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> Wait for others to have a look but my approach is to home in
on their rejection and say why it doesn't work.
>
--- End Quote ---
thanks, this is my final draft, i think ive covered all the
points you mentioned
To whom it may concern
I am again challenging the PCN on the grounds the contravention
did not occur. There is no signage restricting the double yellow
lines for blue badge parking.
You refer to yellow kerb markings in pictures taken by your CEO
but as you can see its extremely faint and barely visible,
furthermore there are no clearly marked sequence of kerb blips
along that stretch of Poplars Road to alert drivers to a loading
restriction.
There is also no 'no loading' sign on Poplars Road, which is a
dead end, separated by bollards from Lea Bridge Road. The sign
provided by your CEO is on Lea Bridge Road and can ONLY be seen
if you're on Lea Bridge road.
I thus consider this PCN totally invalid and that it should be
cancelled with immediate effect.
Regards
#Post#: 40478--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: mkdon
Date: October 12, 2024, 8:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi guys
I got a letter from the council today, they've rejected my
appeal again. I've attached image of the correspondence. Can
anyone advice what I should include in my appeal to the
adjudicator
HTML https://ibb.co/5rQ1k8J
HTML https://ibb.co/Gdz51Y8
HTML https://ibb.co/1Z3JR3Q
HTML https://ibb.co/cvVdhXH
Thanks
#Post#: 40480--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: October 12, 2024, 8:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They've left irrelevant stuff in from a loading bay
contravention, which to say the least shows lack of care in
adapting boilerplate.
And it is boilerplate - they've not addressed your
representation.
The discount is on offer but I would take this to the tribunal.
HTML https://i.imgur.com/I5AGMdT.jpeg
#Post#: 40493--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: mkdon
Date: October 12, 2024, 10:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yh I noticed too they didn't address any of the issues I raised,
it's basically the same response as their initial rejection.
As for the tribunal, should my key argument be lack or blips on
road or that it's faint and why single blip needs a sign?
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> They've left irrelevant stuff in from a loading bay
contravention, which to say the least shows lack of care in
adapting boilerplate.
>
> And it is boilerplate - they've not addressed your
representation.
>
> The discount is on offer but I would take this to the
tribunal.
>
>
HTML https://i.imgur.com/I5AGMdT.jpeg
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 40501--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: October 12, 2024, 11:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I doubt they will contest this. Register the appeal and request
a personal or telephone hearing.
I would send:
1. I would like draw attention to the authority's rejection of
my representations. It is clear they have not addressed them but
just send template text that is also careless in including
material from a different alleged contravention (loading bay).
2. To recap, my representations are as below and I believe they
are solid grounds that as the father of a blue badge holder (my
son) I was entitled to rely on the exemption for waiting on
yellow lines owing to the lack of any evidence of a loading
restriction at our parking place.
reps
#Post#: 40513--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: October 13, 2024, 2:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I think the kerb marks are worn beyond the point of substantial
compliance. I can be your free representative at the NtO and
tribunal stages. (oops, using my phone earlier and missed that
there was already an NoR, I can be your representative. email
mrmustard@zoho.com)
#Post#: 40520--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: October 13, 2024, 4:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There was also a no loading sign in Poplars Road, which seems to
have disappeared. The council's pics show no sequence of blips.
Their rejection is insulting.
If they contest this I would hope costs are considered.
#Post#: 40634--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: mkdon
Date: October 14, 2024, 3:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> There was also a no loading sign in Poplars Road, which seems
to have disappeared. The council's pics show no sequence of
blips. Their rejection is insulting.
>
> If they contest this I would hope costs are considered.
>
--- End Quote ---
thanks, i will do,
#Post#: 40800--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN 02 - Waltham Forest - No signs and wrong road
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: October 15, 2024, 4:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
By a fluke here's another case in that bit of Poplars but the
contravention is an 01 not an 02 which blows up yours even more
if we need it.
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/waltham-forest-01-parked-in-restricted-street-poplars-road-e17/
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 5
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page